The appropriate use of subpopulation corrections for differences in endogamous communities

Forensic Science International

Volumn 168, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 106-111

  Curran, James M ^a   Buckleton, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Food Research Ltd   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

DNA; Fst; Match probabilities; Pedigrees; Population substructure; Relatedness

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSANGUINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FINGERPRINTING; EXTENDED FAMILY; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; PAKISTAN; PEDIGREE; POPULATION GENETIC PARAMETERS; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION;

EID: 34247264354     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.06.073     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Zhivotovsky L.A., Ahmed S., Wang W., and Bittles A. The forensic DNA implications of genetic differentiation between endogamous communities. Forensic Sci. Int. 119 (2001) 269-272
2. Wang W., Sullivan S.G., Ahmed S., Chandler D., Zhivotovsky L.A., and Bittles A.H. A genome-based study of consanguinity in three co-resident endogamous Pakistan communities. Ann. Hum. Genet. 94 (2000) 41-49
3. NRC II, National Research Council Committee on DNA Forensic Science. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence (1996), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
4. Balding D.J., and Nichols R.A. DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. Forensic Sci. Int. 64 (1994) 125-140
5. Evett I.W., and Weir B.S. Interpreting DNA Evidence-Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists (1998), Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland
6. Wright S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugenics 15 (1951) 159-171
7. Weir B.S. Genetic Data Analysis vol. II (1996), Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
8. Cockerham C.C., and Weir B.S. Estimation of inbreeding parameters in stratified populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 50 (1986) 271-281
9. Ayres K.L., and Balding D.J. Measuring departures from Hardy-Weinberg: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method for estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Heredity 80 (1998) 769-777
10. Balding D.J., and Nichols R.A. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 96 (1995) 3-12
11. Rahman Z., Afroze T., and Weir B.S. DNA typing results from two urban subpopulations of Pakistan. J. Forensic Sci. 46 (2001) 111-115
12. Overall A.D.J., and Nichols R.A. A method for distinguishing consanguinity and population substructure using multilocus genotype data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 (2001) 2048-2056
13. Grant J.C., and Bittles A.H. The comparative role of consanguinity in infant and child mortality in Pakistan. Ann. Hum. Genet. 641 (1997) 143-149
14. ® SGM Plus™ loci. Forensic Sci. Int. 122 (2001) 189-195
15. Lewis P.O., and Zaykin D. Genetic Data Analysis, Version 1.0 (d16c) (2001). http://www.lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html
16. Weir B.S., and Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38 (1984) 1358-1370