Re-examining the relationship between degree of relatedness, genetic effects, and heterosis in Maize

Crop Science

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 629-635

  Lee, E A ^a   Ash, M J ^a   Good, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 34247259011     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2006.04.0275     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Brown, D.M., and A. Bootsma. 1993. Crop heat units for corn and other warm-season crops in Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Agric. and Food Factsheet Agdex 111/31, ISSN no. 0225-7882. OMAF, Queen's Park, ON.
2. Bruce, A.B. 1910. The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Science 32:627-628.
3. Brunner, S., K. Fengler, M. Morgante, S. Tingey, and A. Rafalski. 2005. Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell 17:343-360.
4. Crow, J.F. 1998. 90 years ago: The beginning of hybrid maize. For. Genet. 148:923-928.
5. Davenport, C.B. 1908. Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Science 28:454-455.
6. Dudley, J.W., M.A. Saghai Maroof, and G.K. Rufener. 1991. Molecular markers and grouping parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 31:718-723.
7. Duvick, D.N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. p. 19-29. In J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (ed.) The genetic and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASSA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.
8. East, E.M. 1908. Inbreeding in corn, 1907. p. 419-428. In Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn Rep.
9. Falconer, D.S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, London.
10. Fu, H., and H.K. Dooner. 2002. Intraspecific violation of genetic colinerity and its mplications in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9573-9578.
11. Gardner, C.O., and S.A. Eberhart. 1966. Analysis and interpretation of the variety cross diallel and related populations. Biometrics 22:439-452.
12. Graham, G.I., D.W. Wolff, and C.W. Stuber. 1997. Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci. 37:1601-1610.
13. Keeble, F., and C. Pellew. 1910. The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). J. Genet. 1:47-56.
14. Lanza, L.L.B., C.L. de Souza, Jr., L.M.M. Ottoboni, M.L.C. Vieira, and A.P. de Souza. 1997. Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94:1023-1030.
15. Lee, E.A., B. Good, R. Chakravarty, and L. Kannenberg. 2000a. CG104 and CG105 corn inbred lines. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:599-600.
16. Lee, E.A., B. Good, R. Chakravarty, and L. Kannenberg. 2000b. CG108 corn inbred line. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:817-818.
17. Lee, E.A., B. Good, R. Chakravarty, and L. Kannenberg. 2001. Corn inbred lines CG60 and CG62. Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:453-454.
18. Lee, E.A., A. Singh, M.J. Ash, and B. Good. 2006. Use of sister-lines and the performance of modified single-cross maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 46:312-320.
19. Lee, M., E.B. Godshalk, K.R. Lamkey, and W.W. Woodman. 1989. Association of restriction fragment length polymorphisms among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci. 29:1067-1071.
20. Lin, C.S., and M.R. Binns. 1991. Genetic properties of four types of stability parameters. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:505-509.
21. Melchinger, A.E. 1999. Genetic diversity and heterosis. p. 99-118. In J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (ed.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
22. Melchinger, A.E., M. Lee, K.R. Lamkey, and W.L. Woodman. 1990. Genetic diversity for restriction fragment length polymorphisms: Relation to estimated genetic effects in maize inbreds. Crop Sci. 30:1033-1040.
23. Melchinger, A.E., M.M. Messmer, M. Lee, W.L. Woodman, and K.R. Lamkey. 1991. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31:669-678.
24. Mulitze, D.K. 1992. Agrobase IV reference manual. Agronomix Software, Portage la Prairie, MB.
25. Reif, J.C., A.E. Melchinger, X.C. Xia, M.L. Warburton, D.A. Hoisington, S.K. Vasal, G. Srinivasan, M. Bohn, and M. Frisch. 2003. Genetic distance based on simple sequence repeats and heterosis in tropical maize populations. Crop Sci. 43:1275-1282.
26. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS language guide. Release 8.00 Edition, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
27. Shull, G.H. 1908. The composition of a field of maize. Amer. Breeders' Assoc. Rep. 4:296-301.
28. Shull, G.H. 1909. A pureline method of corn breeding. Amer. Breeders' Assoc. Rep. 5:51-59.
29. Shull, G.H. 1952. Beginnings of the heterosis concept. p. 14-48. In J.W. Gowen (ed.) Heterosis: A record of researches directed toward explaining and utilizing the vigor of hybrids. Iowa State College Press, Ames.
30. Smith, J.S.C., O.S. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg, and S.J. Wall. 1991. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. III. A revised scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines utilizing DNA RFLPs. Maydica 36:213-226.
31. Smith, O.S., J.S.C. Smith, S.L. Bowen, R.A. Tenborg, and S.J. Wall. 1990. Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:833-840.
32. Song, R., and J. Messing. 2003. Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:9055-9066.