The effect of sedation on the quality of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: An investigator-blinded, randomized study comparing propofol with midazolam

Endoscopy

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 345-349

  Meining, Alexander ^a   Semmler, V ^a,b   Kassem, A M ^c   Sander, R ^b   Frankenberger, U ^b   Burzin, M ^d   Reichenberger, J ^a   Bajbouj, M ^a   Prinz, C ^a   Schmid, R M ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Gastropraxis Harlaching   (Germany)

^c Faculty of Computer Science   (Egypt)

^d Klinikum Freising   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE DOSE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; SEDATION; VIDEOTAPE;

CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DYSPEPSIA; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL;

EID: 34247241633     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-945195     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abraham N, Fallone CA, Mayrand S et al. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 1692-1699
2. Faulx AL, Vela S, Das A et al. The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: a national web survey. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 993
3. Ristikankare M, Kartikainen J, Heikkinen M, Julkunen R. Is routine sedation or topical pharyngeal anesthesia beneficial during upper endoscopy? Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 686-694
4. Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G. Preparation, premedication and surveillance. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 103-111
5. Heuss LT, Froehlich F, Beglinger C. Changing patterns of sedation and monitoring practice during endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey in Switzerland. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 161-166
6. Jung M, Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A. Improved sedation in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: propofol is an alternative to midazolam. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 233-238
7. Hofmann C, Kiesslich R, Brackertz A, Jung M. Propofol for sedation in gastroscopy: a randomized comparison with midazolam. Z Gastroenterol 1999; 37: 589-595
8. Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1957-1963
9. Carlsson U, Grattidge P. Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a comparative study of propofol and midazolam. Endoscopy 1995: 27: 240-243
10. Krugliak P, Ziff B, Rusabrov Y et al. Propofol versus midazolam for conscious sedation guided by processed EEG during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 677-682
11. Chen WX, Lin HJ, Zhang WF et al. Sedation and safety of propofol for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2005; 4: 437-440
12. Byrne MF, Baillie J. Nurse-assisted propofol sedation: the jury is in! Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1781-1792
13. Kulling D, Rothenbuhler R, Inauen W. Safety of nonanesthesist sedation with propofol for outpatient colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 679-682
14. Saenz-Lopez S, Rodriguez Munoz S, Rodriguez-Alcalde D et al. Endoscopist controlled administration of propofol: an effective and safe method of sedation in endoscopic procedures. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2006; 98: 25-35
15. Rex DK, Heuss LT, Walker JA, Qi R. Trained registered nurses/ endoscopy teams can administer propofol safety for endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 1384-1391
16. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guidelines for conscious sedation and monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003: 58: 317-322
17. Hofmann C, Jung M. Sedierung und Überwachung bei endoskopischen Eingriffen. Guidelines of the endoscopic section of the German Society for Digestive and Metabolic Diseases. Available from: http://www.dgvs.de/ media/1.2.Sedierung-ueberwachung.pdf
18. Neumann M, Friedl S, Meining A et al. A score card for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: evaluation of interobserver variability in examiners with various levels of experience. Z Gastroenterol 2002; 40: 857-862
19. Ulmer BJ, Hansen JJ, Overley CA et al. Propofol versus midazolam/ fentanyl for outpatient colonoscopy: administration by nurses supervised by endoscopists. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003; 1: 425-432
20. Qadeer MA, Vargo JJ, Khandwala F et al. Propofol versus traditional sedative agents for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 1049-1056
21. Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. Endoscopist administered propofol for upper gastrointestinal EUS is safe and effective: a prospective study in 500 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 356-360