Using the bilateral internal mammary artery in the left or right coronary artery system: 5-Year comparison of operation techniques and angiographic results

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 345-350

  Toker, Mehmet Erdem ^a   Ömeroglu, Suat Nail ^a   Kirali, Kaan ^a   Balkanay, Mehmet ^a   Yakut, Cevat ^a  

^a KOSUYOLU HEART AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAMMARY ARTERY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERIES; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34247240521     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20051165     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Ascione R, Underwood MJ, Lloyd CT, Jeremy JY, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. 2001. Clinical and angiographic outcome of different surgical strategies of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 72:959-65.
2. Ashraf SS, Shaukat N, Akhtar K, et al. 1994. A comparison of early mortality and morbidity after single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafting with the free right internal mammary artery. Br Heart J 72:321-6.
3. Berreklouw E, Rademakers PPC, Koster JM, van Leur L, van der Wielen BJW, Westers P. 2001. Better ischemic event-free survival after two internal thoracic artery grafts: 13 years of follow-up. Ann Thorac Surg 72:1535-41.
4. Buche M, Schroeder E, Chenu P, et al. 1995. Revascularization of the circumflex artery with the pedicled right internal thoracic artery: clinical functional and angiographic midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110:1338-43.
5. Buxton BF, Reungsakulrach P, Fuller J, Rosalion A, Reid CM, Tatoulis J. 2000. The right internal thoracic artery graft-benefits of grafting the left coronary system and native vessels with a high grade stenosis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:255-61.
6. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Giammarca GD, et al. 1999. Multiple arterial conduits without cardiopulmonary bypass: early angiographic results. Ann Thorac Surg 67:450-6.
7. Chow MST, Sim E, Orszulak TA, Schaff HV. 1994. Patency of internal thoracic artery grafts: comparison of right versus left and importance of vessel grafted. Circulation 90(part 2):129-32.
8. Dewar LRS, Jamieson WRE, Janusz MT, et al. 1995. Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization, survival and event-free performance. Circulation 92(Suppl II);8-13.
9. Dietl CA, Benoit LH, Gilbert CL, et al. 1995. Which is the graft of choice for the right coronary and posterior descending arteries? Comparison of the right internal mammary artery and the right gastroepiploic artery. Circulation 92(Suppl II):92-7.
10. Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. 2001. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 104:2164-70.
11. Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P, et al. 1990. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 49:202-9.
12. Gerola LR, Puig LB, Moreira LFP, et al. 1996. Right internal thoracic artery through the transverse sinus in myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1708-13.
13. He GW, Ryan WH, Acuff TE, et al. 1994. Risk factors for operative mortality and sternal wound infection in bilateral internal mammary artery grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 107:196-202.
14. Ioannidis JP, Galanos O, Katritsis D, et al. 2001. Early mortality and morbidity of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery revascularization: propensity and risk modeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:521-8.
15. Jones JW, Schmidt SE, Miller R, Nahas C, Beall AC Jr. 1997. Suitability and durability of multiple internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypasses. Ann Surg 225:785-92.
16. Kirali K, Daglar B, Güler M, et al. 1999. Experiences of Kosuyolu in minimally invasive coronary artery surgery. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7:25-9.
17. Kirali K, Rabus MB, Yakut N, et al. 2002. Early- and long-term comparison of the on- and off-pump bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Heart Surg Forum 5:177-81.
18. Knapik P, Spyt TJ, Richardson JB, McLennan I. 1996. Bilateral and unilateral use of internal thoracic artery for myocardial revascularization. Comparison of extubation outcome and duration of hospital stay. Chest 109:1231-3.
19. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. 1999. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:855-72.
20. Lytle BW, Loop FD. 2001. Superiority of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Circulation 104:2152-4.
21. Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Güler M, et al. 2000. Mid-term angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 70:844-9.
22. Pick AW, Orszulak TA, Anderson BJ, Schaff HV. 1997. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts: 10-year outcome analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 64:599-605.
23. Schmidt SE, Jones JW, Thornby JI, Miller III CC, Beall AC Jr. 1997. Improved survival with multiple left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 64:9-15.
24. Taggart DP. 2000. Respiratory dysfunction after cardiac surgery: effects of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and the use of bilateral internal mammary arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18:31-7.
25. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Royse AG. 1999. Total arterial coronary revascularization: techniques and results in 3,220 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 68:2093-9.
26. Toker ME, Kirali K, Guler M, et al. 2000. The use of bilateral internal mammarian artery for coronary artery revascularization: mid-term results. T Klin J Cardiovasc Surg 1:13-8.
27. Ura M, Sakata R, Nakayama Y, Arai Y, Saito T. 2000. Long-term results of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 70:1991-6.