Defining patch mosaic functional types to predict invasion patterns in a forest landscape

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 464-481

  Chabrerie, Olivier ^a   Roulier, Frédéric ^a   Hoeblich, Hélène ^a   Sebert Cuvillier, Emmanuelle ^a   Closset Kopp, Déborah ^a   Leblanc, Isabelle ^b   Jaminon, Jérôme ^b   Decocq, Guillaume ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PICARDIE JULES VERNE   (France)

^b Pare Technologique Orléans Charbonnière   (France)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Forest ecosystem; Forest soils; Functional groups; Heterogeneity; Landscape traits; Management strategy; Prunus serotina; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; GIS; INVASIVE SPECIES; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; PATCH DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL PROPERTY; TEMPERATE FOREST;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FRANCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRUNUS; TIME; TREE;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; FRANCE; PRUNUS; TIME FACTORS; TREES;

EURASIA; EUROPE;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS; PRUNUS; PRUNUS SEROTINA;

EID: 34247231064     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/06-0614     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andow, D. A., P. M. Kareiva, S. A. Levin, and A. Okubo. 1990. Spread of invading organisms. Landscape Ecology 4:177-188.
2. Auclair, A. N. 1975. Sprouting response in Prunus serotina Erhr.: multivariate analysis of site, forest structure and growth rate relationships. American Midland Naturalist 94:72-87.
3. Auclair, A. N., and G. Cottam. 1971. Dynamics of black cherry (Prunus serotina Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Ecological Monographs 41:153-177.
4. Bonneau, M., and C. Nys. 1997. Effects des amendements calcimagnésiques en forêt. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie d'Agriculture de France 83:161-169.
5. Bruno, J. F., C. W. Kennedy, T. A. Rand, and M.-B. Grant. 2004. Landscape-scale patterns of biological invasions in shoreline plant communities. Oikos 107:531-540.
6. Burel, F., and J. Baudry. 1999. Ecologie du paysage: concepts, méthodes et applications. Second edition. Editions Tec et Doc, Paris, France.
7. Chabrerie, O., H. Hoeblich, and G. Decocq. 2006. Déterminisme et conséquences écologiques de la dynamique invasive du cerisier tardif (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) sur les communautés végétales de la forêt de Compiègne. Acta Botanica Gallica 132, in press.
8. Chambre d'Agriculture de l'Aisne. 1981. Carte des sols du département de l'Aisne. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Département de l'Aisne, Laon, France.
9. Corney, P. M., M. G. Le Duc, S. M. Smart, K. J. Kirby, R. G. H. Bunce, and R. H. Marrs. 2004. The effect of landscape-scale environmental drivers on the vegetation composition of British woodlands. Biological Conservation 120:491-505.
10. Cronk, Q. C. B., and J. Fuller. 1995. Plant invaders: the threat to natural ecosystems. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
11. D'Antonio, C. M., and L. A. Meyerson. 2002. Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10:703-713.
12. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasiblity. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
13. Deckers, B., K. Verheyen, M. Hermy, and B. Muys. 2005. Effects of landscape structure on the invasive spread of black cherry Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Ecography 28:99-109.
14. Duchaufour, P. 1997. Abrégéde pédologie: sol, végétation et environnement. Fifth edition. Masson, Paris, France.
15. Dufrêne, M., and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345-366.
16. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasion by animals and plants. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.
17. Fairbanksa, D. H. K., and A. B. Grant. 2000. Identifying regional landscapes for conservation planning: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning 50:237-257.
18. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. First edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
19. Franklin, J. 1995. Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modeling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients. Progress in Physical Geography 19:494-519.
20. Franklin, J. F., and R. T. T. Forman. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1:5-18.
21. Gao, Q. O., and X. S. Yang. 1997. A relationship between spatial processes and a partial patchiness index in a grassland landscape. Landscape Ecology 12:321-330.
22. Gitay, H., and I. R. Noble. 1997. What are functional types and how should we seek them? Pages 13-23 in T. M. Smith, H. H. Shugart, and F. I. Woodward, editors. Plant functional types: their relevance to ecosystem properties and global change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
23. Godefroid, S., S. S. Phartyal, G. Weyembergh, and N. Koedam. 2005. Ecological factors controlling the abundance of non-native invasive black cherry (Prunus serotina) in deciduous forest understory in Belgium. Forest Ecology and Management 210:91-105.
24. Graham, R. L., C. T. Hunsaker, R. V. O'Neil, and B. L. Jackson. 1991. Ecological risk assessment at the regional scale. Ecological Applications 1:196-206.
25. Hierro, J. L., J. L. Maron, and R. M. Callaway. 2005. A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range. Journal of Ecology 93:5-15.
26. Holdenrieder, O., M. Pautasso, P. J. Weisberg, and D. Lonsdale. 2004. Tree diseases and landscape processes: the challenge of landscape pathology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:446-452.
27. Hunsaker, C. T., R. L. Graham, G. W. Suter, II, R. V. O'Neill, L. W. Barnthouse, and R. H. Gardner. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environmental Management 14:325-332.
28. Hutchinson, T. F., and J. L. Vankat. 1998. Landscape structure and the spread of the exotic shrub Lonicera maackii in southwestern Ohio forests. American Midland Naturalist 139:383-390.
29. Johnstone, I. M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biological Review 61:369-394.
30. Kristensen, S. P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of landscape changes and farm characteristics in a study area in central Jutland, Denmark. Ecological Modelling 168:303-318.
31. Lavenu, G. 2005. Outil de création et d'analyse par mailles. Pages 1-5 in Support technique d'ESRI France. ESRI France, Meudon, France.
32. Lavorel, S., and E. Garnier. 2002. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16:545-556.
33. Lee, C.-S., H.-J. Cho, and H. Yi. 2004. Stand dynamics of introduced black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) plantation under different disturbance regimes in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management 189:281-293.
34. Macdonald, I. A. W., and G. W. Frame. 1988. The invasion of introduced species into nature reserves in tropical savannas and dry woodlands. Biological Conservation 44:67-93.
35. McCune, B., and J. B. Grace, editors. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. First edition. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
36. Moilanen, A., and I. Hanski. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79:2503-2515.
37. Myers, J. H., D. Simberloff, A. M. Kuris, and J. R. Carey. 2000. Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:316-320.
38. Norton, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and L. Atkins. 1995. Fragmentation, disturbance, and plant distribution: mistletoes in woodland remnants in the western Australian wheatbelt. Conservation Biology 9:426-438.
39. Office National des Forêts. 1995. Forêt Domaniale de Compiègne: Révision d'aménagement forestier 1996-2010. Office National des Forêts, Direction Nationale de Picardie, Division de Compiègne, Compiègne, France.
40. Ostfeld, R. S., G. E. Glass, and F. Keesing. 2005. Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20:328-336.
41. Pairon, M., O. Chabrerie, C. Mainer Casado, and A.-L. Jacquemart. 2006. Sexual regeneration traits linked to black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) invasiveness. Acta Oecologica. 30:238-247.
42. Pickett, S. T. A., and M. L. Cadenasso. 1995. Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331-335.
43. Pyšek, P., and K. Prach. 1993. Plant invasions and the role of riparian habitats: a comparison of four species alien to central Europe. Journal of Biogeography 20:413-420.
44. Riera, J. L., J. T. Magnuson, J. R. V. Castle, and M. D. MacKenzie. 1998. Analysis of large-scale spatial heterogeneity in vegetation indices among North American landscapes. Ecosystems 1:268-282.
45. Riitters, K. H., R. V. O'Neill, C. T. Hunsaker, J. D. Wickham, D. H. Yankee, S. P. Timmins, K. B. Jones, and B. L. Jackson. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10:23-39.
46. Rouget, M., D. M. Richardson, S. J. Milton, and D. Polakow. 2004. Predicting the dynamics of four invasive Pinus species in a fragmented semi-arid shrubland in South Africa. Plant Ecology 152:79-92.
47. Schumacher, N. H. 1996. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. Ecology 77:1210-1225.
48. Simberloff, D. 2001. Biological invasions: How are they affecting us, and what can we do about them? Western North American Naturalist 61:308-315.
49. Skånes, H. M., and R. G. H. Bunce. 1997. Directions of landscape change (1741-1993) in Virestad, Sweden characterised by multivariate analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning 38:61-75.
50. Smith, A. J. 1975. Invasion and ecesis of bird-disseminated woody plants in a temperate forest sere. Ecology 56:19-34.
51. Solbrig, O. T., editor. 1991. From genes to ecosystems, a research agenda for biodiversity. IUBS-SCOPE-UNESCO, Paris, France.
52. Starfinger, U. 1997. Introduction and naturalization of Prunus serotina in central Europe. Pages 161-171 in J. H. Brock, M. Wade, P. Pyšek, and D. Green, editors. Plant invasions: studies from North America and Europe. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands.
53. Starfinger, U., I. Kowarik, M. Rode, and H. Schepker. 2003. From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? The perception of an alien plant species through the centuries. Biological Invasions 5:323-335.
54. Thioulouse, J., D. Chessel, S. Doledec, and J. M. Olivier. 1997. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis and graphical display software. Statistics and Computing 7:75-83.
55. Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O'Neil. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. First edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
56. With, K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conservation Biology 16:1192-1203.
57. Zalba, S. M., M. I. Sonaglioni, C. A. Compagnoni, and C. J. Belenguer. 2000. Using a habitat model to assess the risk of invasion by an exotic plant. Biological Conservation 93:203-208.