Power and negotiation: Lessons from agent-based participatory simulations

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 27-33

  Guyot, Paul ^a   Drogoul, Alexis ^b   Honiden, Shinichi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Agent based simulations; Negotiations; Participatory simulations; Power relations

Indexed keywords

AGENT-BASED SIMULATIONS; PARTICIPATORY SIMULATIONS; POWER RELATIONS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; ONTOLOGY;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34247227622     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1160633.1160636     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. J. Andreoni. Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Quaterly Journal of Economics, 110:1-22, 1995.
2. B. Arthur. Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. American Economic Review, 84:406-411, 1994.
3. O. Barreteau. Our companion modelling approach. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(2), 2003.
4. O. Barreteau and F. Bousquet. Jeux de rôles et validation de systèmes multi-agents. In G. M-P and M. P, editors, Ingénierie des systèmes multi-agents, actes des 7èmes JFIADSMA, pages 67-80. Hermès, 1999.
5. O. Barreteau, F. Bousquet, and J.-M. Attonaty. Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: method and lessons of its application to Senegal river valley irrigated systems. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 4(2), 2001.
6. F. Bousquet, I. Bakam, H. Proton, and C. Le Page. Cormas: Common-pool resources and multi-agent systems. In A. P. Del Pobil, J. Mira, and M. Ali, editors, Tasks and Methods in Applied Artificial Intelligence, 11th International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, IEA/AIE-98, Castellón, Spain, June 1-4, 1998, Proceedings, Volume II, volume 1416 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 826-837. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
7. S. Brainov and T. Sandholm. Power, dependence and stability in multiagent plans. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'99), Orlando, pages 11-16. AAAI Press, 1999.
8. C. F. Camerer and E. Fehr. Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. In J. Henrich, R. Boyd, S. Bowles, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, and H. Gintis, editors, Foundations of Human Sociality - Experimental and Ethnographic Evidence from 15 Small-Scale Societies, page 320. Oxford University Press, 2004.
9. C. Castelfranchi. Social power: A point missed in multi-agent, dai, and hci. In Y. Demazeau and J.-P. Müller, editors, Decentralized Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW-89), pages 49-62, Amsterdam, 1990. Elsevier.
10. R. Dahl. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3):201-215, July 1957.
11. M. Etienne. Sylvopast: a multiple target role-playing game to assess negotiation processes in sylvopastoral management planning. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(2), 2003.
12. D. Friedman and S. Sunder. Experimental Methods -A Primer For Economists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.
13. J. Grossklags and C. Schmidt. Artificial software agents on thin double auction markets: A human trader experiment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT-2003), Halifax, Canada, October 13-17, 2003, 2003.
14. P. Guyot. Simulations multi-agents participatives: Vers une méthode de validation et de consolidation des modèles de pratiques collectives. Master's thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 2003.
15. P. Guyot and A. Drogoul. Multi-agent based participatory simulations on various scales. In T. Ishida, L. Gasser, and H. Nakashima, editors, Proceedings of International Workshop on Massively Multi-agent Systems, volume 3446 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 149-160, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. Springer-Verlag.
16. P. Guyot and A. Drogoul. Using emergence in participatory simulations to design multi-agent systems. In F. Dignum, V. Dignum, S. Koenig, S. Kraus, M. P. Singh, and M. Wooldridge, editors, International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-05), 2005.
17. R. Mathevet, C. Le Page, M. Etienne, G. Gigot, G. Lefebvre, B. Poulin, and A. Mauchamp. Butorstar: a role-playing game for collective awareness of reedbed wise use. Technical report, In prep., 2005.
18. K. Nakano, S. Matsuyama, and T. Terano. Research on a learning system toward integration of case method and business gaming. In H. Deguchi, K. Kijima, T. Terano, and H. Kita, editors, Proceedings of The Fourth International Workshop on Agent-based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems (AESCS) 2005, 2005.
19. H. V. D. Parunak. Characterizing multi-agent negotiation, 1998.
20. E. Platon, N. Sabouret, and S. Honiden. Overhearing and direct interactions: Point of view of an active environment, a preliminary study. In D. Weyns, H. V. D. Parunak, and F. Michel, editors, Proceedings of AAMAS workshop on Environment for Multi-Agent Systems (E4MAS 2005), 2005.
21. J. S. a. Sichman, D. Yves, R. Conte, and C. Castelfranchi. A social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 274-278. Wiley & Sons, 1994.
22. J. Wang and L. Gasser. Mutual online ontology alignment. In OAS'02 Ontologies in Agent Systems, Proceedings of the AAMAS 2002 Workshop, volume 66 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2002.