Ecophysiological models of fruit quality: A challenge for peach and tomato

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 718, Issue , 2006, Pages 633-645

  Bertin, N ^a   Bussieres P ^a   Genard M ^a  

^a Domaine Saint Paul   (France)

Author keywords

Acid; Fruit size; Modelling; Quality; Sugar

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PRUNUS PERSICA;

EID: 34247220867     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2006.718.74     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Andrews, J., Adams, S.R., Burton, K.S. and Evered, C.E. 2002. Subcellular localization of peroxidase in tomato fruit skin and the possible implications for the regulation of fruit growth. J. Exp. Bot. 53:2185-2191.
2. Austin, P.T., Hall, A.J., Gandar, P.W., Warrington, I.J., Fulton, T.A. and Halligan, E.A. 1999. A compartment model of the effect of early-season temperatures on potential size and growth of 'Delicious' apple fruits. Ann. Bot. 83:129-143.
3. Bargel, H. and Neinhuis, C. 2005. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit growth and ripening as related to the biochemical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle. J. Exp. Bot. 56:1049-1060.
4. Bar-Tal, A., Fishman, S., Aloni, B. and Génard, M. 1999. Simulation of environmental effects on Ca content in pepper fruit. Acta Hort. 507:253-262.
5. Bergervoet, J.H.W., Verhoeven, H.A., Gilissen, L.J.W. and Bino, R.J. 1996. High amounts of nuclear DNA in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) pericarp. Plant Sci. 116:141-145.
6. Bertin, N., Fishman, S. and Génard, M. 2003. A model for early stage of tomato fruit development: cell multiplication and cessation of the cell proliferative activity. Ann. Bot. 92:65-72.
7. Bussières, P. 1994. Water import rate in tomato fruit: a resistance model. Ann. Bot. 73:75-82.
8. Bussières, P. 2002. Water import in the young tomato fruit limited by pedicel resistance and calyx transpiration. Funct. Plant Biol. 29:631-641.
9. Cheniclet, C., Rong, W.Y., Causse, M., Frangne, N., Bolling, L., Carde, J.P. and Renaudin, J.P. 2005. Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variability in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth. Plant Physiol. 139 (in press).
10. Ciliberto, A. and Tyson, J.J. 2000. Mathematical model for early development of the sea urchin embryo. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 62:37-59.
11. D'Amato, F. 1964. Endopolyploidy as a factor in plant tissue development. Caryologia 17:41-52.
12. Davies, J.N. and Hobson, G.E. 1981. The constituents of tomato fruit - the influence of environment, nutrition and genotype. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 15:205-280.
13. Dayan, E., Presnov, E., Fuchs, M. and Ben Asher, J. 2002. Rose growth: a model to describe green house rose growth. Acta Hort. 593:63-70.
14. Fishman, S. and Génard, M. 1998. A biophysical model of fruit growth: simulation of seasonal and diurnal dynamics of mass. Plant Cell Env. 21:739-752.
15. Génard, M. and Gouble, B. 2005. ETHY. A theory of fruit climacteric ethylene emission. Plant Physiol. 139:531-545.
16. Génard, M. and Huguet, J.G. 1997. Modelling the effect of irrigation on peach fruit quality. Acta Hort. 449:161-168.
17. Génard, M., Lescourret, F., Gomez, L. and Habib, R. 2003. Changes in fruit sugar concentrations in response to assimilate supply, metabolism and dilution: a modelling approach applied to peach fruit (Prunus persica). Tree Physiol. 23:373-385.
18. Génard, M., Reich, M., Lobit, P. and Besset, J. 1999. Correlations between sugar and acid content and peach growth. J. Hort. Sci. Biotech. 74:772-776.
19. Génard, M. and Souty, M. 1996. Modeling the peach sugar contents in relation to fruit growth. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:1122-1131.
20. Gibert, C., Lescourret, F., Génard, M., Vercambre, G. and Perez Pastor, A. 2005. Modelling the effect of fruit growth on surface conductance to water vapour diffusion. Ann. Bot. 95:673-683.
21. Green, P.B., Erickson, R.O. and Buggy, J. 1971. Metabolic and physical control of cell elongation rate. Plant Physiol. 47:423-430.
22. Guttierrez Colomer, R.P., Gonzalez-Real, M.M. and Baille, A. 2006. Dry matter production and partitioning in rose (Rosa hybrida) flower shoots. Scientia Hort. - Amsterdam 107:284-291.
23. Hamer, P.J.C. 2002. Analysis of strategies for reducing calcium deficiencies in glasshouse grown tomatoes: model functions and simulations. Agr. Sys. 76:181-205.
24. Heuvelink, E. and Bertin, N. 1994. Dry matter partitioning in a tomato crop: comparison of two simulation models. J. Hort. Sci. 69:885-903.
25. Heuvelink, E.P., Lee, J.H. and Carvalho, S.M.P. 2001. Modelling visual product quality in cut chrysanthemum. Acta Hort. 566:77-84.
26. Ho, L.C. 2003. Genetic and cultivation manipulation for improving tomato fruit quality. Acta Hort. 613:21-31.
27. Ho, L.C. and Hewitt, J.D. 1986. Fruit development. p.201-240. In: J.G. Atherton and J. Rudich (eds.), The tomato crop, Chapman and Hall, London.
28. Ho, L.C., Grange, R.I. and Picken, A.J. 1987. An analysis of the accumulation of water and dry matter in tomato fruit. Plant Cell Environ. 10:157-162.
29. Johnson, R.W., Dixon, M.A. and Lee, D.R. 1992. Water relations of tomato during fruit growth. Plant Cell Environ. 15:947-953.
30. Jones, H.G. and Tardieu, F. 1998. Modelling water relations of horticultural crops: a review. Scientia Hort. - Amsterdam 74:21-46.
31. Kläring, H.P., Schonhof, I. and Krumbein, A. 2001. Modelling yield and product quality of Broccoli as affected by temperature and irradiance. Acta Hort. 566:85-90.
32. Kropff, M.J., Haverkort, A.J., Aggarwal, P.K. and Kooman, P.L. 1995. Using systems approaches to design and evaluate ideotypes for specific environments. p.417-435. In: J. Bouma, B.A.M. Bouman, J.C. Luyten and H.G. Zandstra (eds.), Eco-regional approaches for sustainable land use and food production, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publ.
33. Lechaudel, M., Génard, M., Lescourret, F., Urban, L. and Jannoyer, M. 2005. Modelling effects of weather and source-sink relationships on mango fruit growth. Tree Physiol. 25:583-597.
34. Lee, D.R. 1989. Vasculature of the abscission zone of tomato fruit: implications for transport. Can. J. Bot. 67:1898-1902.
35. Lee, D.R. 1990. A unidirectional water flux model of fruit growth. Can. J. Bot. 68:1286-1290.
36. Lee, H.-C., Chiou, D.-W., Chen, W.-H., Markhart, A.H., Chen, Y.-H. and Lin, T.-Y. 2004. Dynamic of cell growth and endoreduplication during orchid flower development. Plant Sci. 166:659-667.
37. Leonardi, C., Baille, A. and Guichard, S. 2000. Predicting transpiration of shaded and non shaded tomato fruits under greenhouse environments. Scientia Hort. - Amsterdam 84:297-307.
38. Lescourret, F. and Génard, M. 2005. A virtual peach fruit model simulating changes in fruit quality during the final stage of fruit growth. Tree Physiol. 25:1-13.
39. Lobit, P., Génard, M., Wu, B.H., Soing, P. and Habib, R. 2003. Modelling citrate metabolism in fruits: response to growth and temperature. J Exp. Bot. 54:2489-2501.
40. Lobit, P., Génard, M., Soing, P. and Habib, R. 2006. Modelling malic acid accumulation in fruits: relationships with organic acids, potassium, and temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 57:1471-1483.
41. Lockart, J.A. 1965. An analysis of irreversible plant cell elongation. J. Theor. Biol. 8:264-275.
42. Marcelis, L.F.M. 1993. Simulation of biomass allocation in greenhouse crops - a review. Acta Hort. 328:49-67.
43. Marcelis, L.F.M. and Gijzen, H. 1998. Evaluation under commercial conditions of a model of prediction of the yield and quality of cucumber fruits. Scientia Hort. - Amsterdam 76:171-181.
44. Melaragno, J.E., Mehrotra, B. and Coleman, A.W. 1993. Relationship between endopolyploidy and cell size in epidermal tissue of Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 5:1661-68.
45. Mingo, D.M., Bacon, M.A. and Davies, W.J. 2003. Non-hydraulic regulation of fruit growth in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Solairo) growing in drying soil. J. Exp. Bot. 54:1205-1212:
46. Mizukami, Y. 2001. A matter of size: developmental control of organ size in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:533-539.
47. Ortega, J.K.E. 1990. Governing equations for plant cell growth. Physiol. Plant. 79:116-121.
48. Quilot, B., Kervella, J., Génard, M. and Lescourret, F. 2005. Analysing the genetic control of peach fruit quality through an ecophysiological model combined with a QTL approach. J. Exp. Bot. 56:3083-3092.
49. Reymond, M., Muller, B., Leonardi, A., Charcosset, A. and Tardieu, F. 2003. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the reponses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol. 131:664-675.
50. Schwarz, D., Kläring, H.P., Ingram, K.T. and Hung, Y.C. 2001. Models-based control of nutrient solution concentration influences tomato growth and fruit quality. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:778-784.
51. Schweizer, L., Yerk-Davis, G.L., Phillips, R.L., Srienc, F. and Jones, R.J. 1995. Dynamic of maize endosperm development and DNA endoreduplication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92:7070-7074.
52. Seginer, I., Bleyaert, P. and Breugelmans, M. 2004. Modelling ontogenic changes of nitrogen and water content in lettuce. Ann. Bot. 94:393-404.
53. Shewfelt, R. 1999. What is quality? Postharvest Biol. Tec. 15:197-200.
54. Struik, P.C., Yin, X. and de Visser, P. 2005. Complex quality traits: now time to model. Trends Plant Sci. 10:513-516.
55. Tardieu, F. 2003. Virtual plants: modeling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci. 8:9-14
56. Thompson, D.S., Davies, W.J. and Ho, L.C. 1998. Regulation of tomato fruit growth by epidermal cell walls enzymes. Plant Cell Environ. 21:589-599.
57. Thornley, J.H.M. 1981. Organogenesis. p.49-65. In: D.A. Rose and D.A. Charles-Edwards (eds.), Mathematics and plant physiology, Academic Press, London.
58. Traas, J., Hülskamp, M., Gendreau, E. and Höfte, H. 1998. Endoreduplication and development: rule without dividing. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:498-503.
59. Tucker, G.A. 1993. Introduction. p. 1-51. In: G.B. Seymour, J.E. Taylor and G.A. Tucker (eds.), Biochemistry of fruit ripening, Chapman and Hall, London.
60. Yin, X., Stam, P., Dourleijn, C.J. and Kropff, M.J. 1999. AFLP mapping of quantitative trait loci for yield-determining physiological characters in spring barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:244-253.
61. Yin, X., Struik, P.C. and Kropff, M.J. 2004. Role of crop physiology in predicting gene-to-phenotype relationships. Trends Plant Sci. 9:426-432.