Did overzealous activists destroy housing affordability in San Francisco?: A time-series Test of the effects of rezoning on construction and home prices, 1967-1998

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 741-756

  Beitel, Karl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Housing markets; Housing policy; Housing prices; Land use; Rent gap; Urban planning; Zoning

Indexed keywords

AFFORDABLE HOUSING; HOUSING FINANCE; HOUSING MARKET; HOUSING POLICY; LAND USE PLANNING; PRICE DETERMINATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; URBAN HOUSING; URBAN PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247217118     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087406296795     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berner, R., and M. Marschoun. 2005. Housing bubble metrics. US Economics. Morgan Stanley. May 27, 2005.
2. Borio, C., and P. McGuire. 2004. Twin peaks in equity and housing prices? BIS Quarterly Review. Bank for International Settlements. March: 79 - 93.
3. Clark, E. 1995. The rent gap re-examined. Urban Studies, 32(9): 1489-1503.
4. Glaeser, E., and J. Gyourko. 2003. The impact of building restriction on housing affordability. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 9(2): 21-39.
5. Guidry, K.A., J. Shilling, and C.F. Sirman. 1991. An econometric analysis of variation in urban residential land prices and the adoption of land-use controls. Working paper. University of Wisconsin, Center for Urban Land Economics Research.
6. Hamnett, C. 1994. Restructuring housing finance and the housing market. In Money, power, and space, edited by S. Corbridge, R. Martin, and N. Thrift, 281-308. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Keene, S. 2000. Debunking economics: The naked emperor of the social sciences. London: Pluto Press.
8. Lee, F. 1998. Post-Keynesian price theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
9. Logan, J., and H. Molotch. 1987. Urban fortunes. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Malpezzi, S. 1996. Housing prices, externalities, and regulation U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research, 7 (2): 209 - 41.
10. Massey, D., and N. Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
11. Mayer, C., and C. Somerville. 2000. Land use regulation and new construction. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 30(6): 639-62.
12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Recent house price developments: The role of fundamentals. In OECD Economic Outlook, No. 78: 193-233.
13. Perron, P. 1989. Testing for a unit root in a time deries with a changing mean. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8(2): 153-62.
14. Real Estate Research Council of Northern California. 1999. Northern California Real Estate Report, Fourth Quarter, 1999. Pomona, CA: California State Polytechnic University.
15. San Francisco Planning Department 1970 - 2001. Housing Inventory Survey. San Francisco, CA.
16. San Francisco Planning Department. 1978. Final Environmental Impact Report. June 27, 1978. San Francisco, CA.
17. San Francisco Planning Department. 2004. Housing element: An element of the San Francisco general plan. San Francisco, CA.
18. Segel, D., and P. Srinivassen. 1985. The impact of suburban growth restrictions of U.S. housing price inflation, 1975-78. Urban Geography 6(1): 14-26.
19. Smith, N. The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. New York: Routledge.
20. Sutton, G. 2002. Explaining changes in housing prices. BIS Quarterly Review. Bank for International Settlements. September: 46-55.
21. Tstsaronis, K., and H. Zhu. 2004. What drives housing price dynamics: cross country evidence. BIS Quarterly Review. Bank for International Settlements. March: 65 - 78.