The promise of cognitive neuroscience for advancing depression research

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 141-145

  Atchley, Ruth Ann ^a   Ilardi, Stephen S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COGNITION; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSION; EDITORIAL; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 34247216181     PISSN: 01475916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-006-9117-7     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Albright, T. D., Kandel, E. R., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Cognitive neuroscience. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 10, 612-624.
2. Heller, W., & Nitschke, J. B. (1997). Regional brain activity in emotion: A framework for understanding cognition in depression. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 638-661.
3. Ilardi, S. S., & Feldman, D. (2001). The cognitive neuroscience paradigm: A unifying meta-theoretical framework for the science and practice of clinical psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1067-1088.
4. Ilardi, S. S., Karwoski, L., & Rand, K. (2006). The cognitive neuroscience perspective allows us to understand abnormal behavior at multiple levels of complexity. In S. O. Lilienfeld & W. O'Donohue (Eds.), The great ideas of clinical science: The 18 concepts that every mental health practitioner and researcher should understand. New York: Brunner-Taylor.
5. Mayberg, H. (2002). Depression, II: localization of pathophysiology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1979.
6. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: W.W. Norton.
7. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.