On the road to the national objectives: A case study of diabetes prevention and control programs

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 287-295

  Ottoson, Judith ^a   Rivera, Mark ^b   DeGroff, Amy ^c   Hackley, Sara ^b   Clark, Cynthia ^a  

^a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ^*  (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^c US Government Accountability Office   (United States)

Author keywords

Case study research; Diabetes prevention and control; Model of Influence; Partnerships; Prevention research; State public health programs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL OBSERVATION; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; PUBLIC HEALTH; UNITED STATES;

CALIFORNIA; CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (U.S.); DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; KENTUCKY; LEADERSHIP; MANAGEMENT AUDIT; MINNESOTA; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEW YORK; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; STATE GOVERNMENT; UNITED STATES; UTAH;

EID: 34247214004     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000267687.15906.81     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Narayan KM, Gregg EW, Fagot-Campagna A, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F. Diabetes - a common, growing, serious, costly, and potentially preventable public health problem. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50(suppl 2):S77-S84.
2. Satterfield DW, Murphy D, Essien JD, et al. Using the essential public health services as strategic leverage to strengthen the public health response to diabetes. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):311-321.
3. Murphy D, Chapel T, Clark C. Moving diabetes care from science to program: the evolution of the National Diabetes Prevention and Control Program. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(11):978-984.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes: disabling, deadly, and on the rise. At a glance. 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/ aag/aag_ddt.htm. Accessed August 28, 2005.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes fact sheet. 2005. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/factsheet05.htm.
6. Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Kaplan RM, Vinicor F, Smith L, Norman J. If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? A population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(2):159-170.
7. Bowman BA, Gregg EW, Williams DE, Engelgau MM, Jack L. Translating the science of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention to inform the public health response to diabetes. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003;(suppl):S8-S14.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About the Division of Diabetes Translation. 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/about/ index.htm#2. Accessed September 4, 2005.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Program Announcement 03017: systems-based Diabetes Prevention and Control Programs (DPCPs). Notice of availability of funds. Fed Reg. 2003;67:227.
10. Safran MA, Mukhtar Q, Murphy DL. Implementing program evaluation and accountability for population health: progress of a national diabetes control effort. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003;9(1):58-65.
11. Fisher EB, Walker EA, Bostrom A, Fischhoff B, Haire-Joshu D, Johnson S. Behavioral science research in the prevention of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):599-606.
12. Damond M,Winters A, Jack L, Cropper D, Londono M, Stoddar R. Mobilizing communities: local applications of the diabetes today national training center project. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2003;(suppl):S15-S18.
13. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2003.
14. Stake RE. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
15. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2000:1-29.
16. Mathison S. Why triangulate? Educ Res. 1988;17(2):13-17.
17. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2002.
18. Rossman GB, Rallis SF. Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2003.
19. Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1980.
20. Rich P. The organizational taxonomy: definition and design. Acad Manag Rev. 1992;17(4):758-781.
21. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
22. Cassell C, Simon G. Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
23. Merriam SB. Case Study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1988.
24. Ottoson JM, Green LW. Reconciling concept and context: a theory of implementation. Adv Health Educ Promot. 1987;2:353-382.