The intensification and bifurcation of surveillance in British criminal justice policy

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 139-158

  Norris, Clive ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Criminal justice policy; Databases; Information technology; New labour; Panopticon; Persistent offender; Policing; Super panopticon; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247213417     PISSN: 09281371     EISSN: 15729869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10610-006-9032-1     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. ACPO (2002). Infinet: A national strategy for mobile information. Association of Chief Police Officers.
2. ACPO-Association of Chief Police Officers-(2005). ANPR strategy for the police service 2005-8: Denying criminals the use of the road, London ACPO, Avialable at: http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/anpr
3. Audit Commission (1993). Helping with enquiries: Tackling crime effectively. London: HMSO.
4. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. BBC (2005). EU approves data retention rules, BBC Online news, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4527840.stm.
6. BBC (2006). 'Criminal records mix-up uncovered', BBC Online news, available at: http://news.bbc.co.nk/1/hi/uk/5001624.stm.
7. Bichard, M. (2004). The Bichard inquiry report. HC 653 London: Stationery Office.
8. Blair, T. (2004). 'Speech on Crime Reduction' Available at: http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page5603. asp.
9. Bogard (1996). The simulation of surveillance: Hyper control in telematic societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Boyne, R. (2000). Post-panopticism. Economy and Society, 29(2), 285-307.
11. Cambridgeshire Constabulary (2006). What is ANPR, available at: http://www.cambs.police.uk/camops/anpr/what.asp.
12. CJIT (2005). Criminal Justice Information Technology - CJS Exchange, avalable at: http://www.cjit.gov.uk/glossary/#c.
13. Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3-7.
14. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus, capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Allen Lane.
16. FSPU - Forensic Science and Pathology Unit - (2005). DNA expansion programme 2000-2005: reporting achievement. London Home Office.
17. Garside, R. (2004). Crime, persistent offenders and the justice. Gap, London: Crime and Society Foundation.
18. Haggerty, K., & Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605-622.
19. Haggerty, K., & Gazso, A. (2005). Seeing beyond the ruins surveillance as a response to terrorist threats. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 30(2), 169-187.
20. Hertfordshire Constabulary (2005). ANPR 'The human chassis number' application for Tilley award available at http://www.popcenter.org/Library/ Tilley/2005/05-02.pdf.
21. OCJR (2004). - Office of criminal justice reform - cutting crime, delivering justice: A strategic plan for criminal justice 2004-08. London: The Stationery Office.
22. HM Treasury (1998). Comprehensive spending review: New public spending plans 1999-2002-modern public services for Britain: Investing in reform. London: The Stationery Office.
23. Home Office (2001a). Criminal justice: The way ahead. Cm 5074, London: Home Office.
24. Home Office (2001b). Policing a new century; A blueprint for reform. London HMSO.
25. Home Office (2002). Narrowing the justice gap: Framework. London: Home Office.
26. Home Office (2004). Building communities, beating crime: A better police service for the 21st Century' London HMSO.
27. Home Office (2004b). Eye in the sky launched to monitor offenders, Press Release 2 September 2004, London Home Office.
28. Home Office (2005). Making provision in the management of offenders and sentencing bill for the mandatory polygraph testing of certain sexual offenders; Regulatory impact assessment, London, Home Office.
29. Home Office (2005b). Sentencing statistics England and Wales 2004, London Home Office.
30. Home Office (2006a). Operational process guidance for implementation of testing on arrest, required assessment and restrictions on bail. London, Home Office.
31. Home Office (2006b). Operational policing - impact: About the programme available at http://police. homeoffice.gov.uk/operational-policing/impact/ impact-about-the-programme/).
32. Home Office (2006c). Operational policing - impact: What we are delivering http://police.homeoffice.gov.uk/operational-policing/impact/what-we- are-delivering/ini/?view=Standard.
33. HMPS - Her Majesty's Prison Service-(2005). Her majesty's prison service annual report and accounts, annex 1: Statistical information. London: Stationery Office.
34. Lianos, M. (2003). Social control after Foucault. Surveillance and Society, 1(3), 412-430.
35. Lianos, & Douglas (2000). Dangerization and the end of deviance: The institutional environment. In D. Garland, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Criminology and social theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Liu, K., & Hu, M. (2005). Semiotic analysis of of e-policing strategies in the United Kingdom. In W. Huang, K. Siau, & K. K. Wei (Eds.), Digital government: Strategien and implementations in developed and developing countries (pp. 373-393). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
37. Lord Falconer (2002). Speech announcing 'Narrowing the Justice Gap' reported at: http://www.policesupers. com/police-supers-news.asp?news-id=240.
38. Marx, G. (1995). The engineering of social control: The search for the silver bullet. In J. Hagan & R. Peterson (Eds.), Crime and inequality. Stanford University Press.
39. Marx, G. (2005). Voluntary" Surveillance' Dissent, Fall: 2005.
40. Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault's "Panopticon" revisited' Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215-234.
41. McCahill, M., & Norris, C. (2003). Estimating the extent, sophistication and legality of CCTV In London. In M. Gill (Ed.), CCTV. Perpetuity Press.
42. NAPO (2005). - National Association of Probation Officers-(2005) Electronically Monitored Curfew Orders: Time for a Review April 2005 available at http://www.napo.org.uk/cgibin/dbman/db.cgi?db= default&uid= default&ID=111&view_records=1&ww=1 acessed 20th May 2006.
43. NPS (2006a). - National Probation Service - Electronic Monitoring, available at http://www.probalion. homeooffice.gov.uk/oulput/Page137. asp#Current%20Programmes-accessed 20th May 2006.
44. NPS (2006b). - National Probation Service - 'Satellite Tracking' http://www.probation.homeoffice.gov.uk/output/Page251.asp accessed 20th May 2006.
45. Newburn, T. (2003). Crime and criminal justice policy. Harlow, Longman.
46. Norris, C. (2003). From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control'. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination (pp. 249-281). New York: Routledge.
47. Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1999). The maximum surveillance society: The rise of closed circuit television. Oxford: Berg.
48. PITO (2004). Memorandum by the Police Information Technology Organisation to the Bichard Inquiry, available at http://www.bichardinquiry.org.uk. edgesuile.net/10663/full_evidence/0018/00180001.pdf.
49. PITO (2005). Police Information Technology Organisation, Annual Report 2004 - 2005, HC 261, London Stationery Office.
50. PITO (2006). Facial Images National Database (FIND), available at http://www.pito.org.uk/products/FIND. php.
51. Poster, M. (1990). The mode of information: Poststructuralism and social context. Cambridge: Polity Press.
52. Postnote (2006). The National DNA Database, Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, February 2006 No. 258.
53. Povey, K. (2000). On the record, thematic inspection report on the police crime recording, the police national computer and phoenix intelligence system data quality. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary.
54. Ransford, F., Perry, D., & Murray, L. (2005). Motoring offences and breath test statistics: England and Wales 2003. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, London: Home Office.
55. Singleton, N., et al. (2005). The impact and effectiveness of mandatory drug testing in prisons. Home Office Research Findings 223, London Home Office.
56. Sondhi, A., O'Shea, J., & Williams, K. (2004). Arrest referral: Emerging findings from the national monitoring and evaluation programme. London: Home Office.
57. Staffordshire Police (2004). Background to the targeted policing initiative, available at http://www. staffordshire.police.uk/ targetedpolicinginitiative.pdf.
58. Times Online (2005). 'Hello, hello, hello: policing better communications' Times Online available at http://business.timesonline.co. uk/article/0,17809-1437307,00.html.
59. Wilkins, G., & Additcott, C. (1998). Motoring offences England and Wales 1996. Home Office Statistical Bulletin, London; Home Office.
60. Yar, M. (2003). Panoptic power and the pathologisation of vision: Critical reflections on the foucauldian thesis. Surveillance and Society, 1(3), 254-271.
61. YJB (2006a). - Youth Justice Board - 'Who is ISSP for?' available at http://www.youthjusticeboard.gov.uk/ YouthJusticeBoard/Sentencing/ IntensiveSupewisionAndSurveilianceProgramme/WhoIsISSPFor.htm.
62. YJB (2006b). Youth Justice Board-'Surveillance' available at YJB - Youth Justice Board - (2006a) 'Who is ISSP for'?' available at http://www. youthjusticeboard.gov.uk/YouthJusticeBoard/Sentencing/Intensives upeivisionAndSurveillanceProgramme/WhoIsISSPFor.htm.
63. YJB (2006c).- Youth Justice Board-'Parenting Order' http://www.youth- justice board.gov.uk/YouthJusticeBoard/Sentencing/ParentingOrder/.