Bypass Graft and Native Postanastomotic Coronary Artery Patency: Assessment With Computed Tomography

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1672-1678

  Andreini, Daniele ^a   Pontone, Gianluca ^a   Ballerini, Giovanni ^a   Bertella, Erika ^a   Nobili, Enrica ^a   Parolari, Alessandro ^a   Pepi, Mauro ^a  

^a CENTRO CARDIOLOGICO MONZINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMARY ARTERY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULAR PATENCY; VEIN GRAFT;

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ARTERIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASCULAR PATENCY; VEINS;

EID: 34247212696     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.01.030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Scanlon P., Faxon D., Audet A., et al., Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (committee on coronary angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 33 (1999) 1756-1824
2. Bashore T.M., Bates E.R., Berger P.B., et al., American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Clinical expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on clinical expert consensus documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 2170-2214
3. Hoffmann U., Hadvar J., Dunn E., et al. Is CT angiography ready for prime time?. A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 Suppl A (2004) 312A
4. Cademartiri F., Marano R., Luccichenti G., et al. Anatomia normale del circolo coronarico con tomografia computerizzata multistrato a 16 canali. Radiol Med 107 (2004) 11-23
5. Desjardins B., and Kazerooni E.A. ECG-gated cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 993-1010
6. Achamnbach S., Moselewski F., Ropers D., et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography. Circulation 109 (2004) 14-17
7. Kopp A.F., Schroeder S., Kuettner A., et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. Eur Heart J 23 (2002) 1714-1725
8. Ferencik M., Moselewski F., Ropers D., et al. Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. Am J Cardiol 92 (2003) 1257-1262
9. Brundage B.H., Lipton M.J., Herfkens R.J., et al. Detection of patent artery bypass grafts by computed tomography: a preliminary report. Circulation 61 (1980) 826-831
10. Moncada R., Salinas M., Churchill R., et al. Patency of saphenous aortocoronary-bypass grafts demonstrated by computer tomography. N Engl J Med 303 (1980) 503-505
11. Engelmann M.G., von Smekal A., Knez A., et al. Accuracy of spiral computer tomography for identifying arterial and venous coronary graft patency. Am J Cardiol 80 (1997) 569-574
12. Ueyama K., Ohashi H., Tsutsumi Y., et al. Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts using helical scan computer tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 46 (1999) 322-326
13. Martuscelli E., Romagnoli A., D'Eliseo A., et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 110 (2004) 3234-3238
14. Salm L.P., Bax J.J., Jukem W., et al. Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography. Am Heart J 150 (2005) 775-781
15. Ropers D., Ulzheimer S., Wenkel E., et al. Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. Am J Cardiol 88 (2001) 792-795
16. Anders K., Baumr S., Schmid M., et al. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patency: assessment with high resolution submillimeter 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography (MDTC) versus coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol 57 (2006) 336-344
17. Marano R., Storto M.L., Maddestra N., et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft with retrospectively ECG-gated four-row multi-detector spiral computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 14 (2004) 1353-1362
18. Rossi R., Chiurlia E., Ratti C., et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Ital Heart J 5 (2004) 36-41
19. Schlosser T., Konorza T., Hunold P., et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 1224-1229
20. Chiurlia E., Menozzi M., Ratti C., et al. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computer tomography. Am J Cardiol 95 (2005) 1094-1097
21. Bourassa M.G., Fisher L.D., Campeau L., et al. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation 72 Suppl V (1985) V71-V78
22. Leber W.A., Knez A., Becker A., et al. Reply to quantification of coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography compared with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 892
23. Nikolau K., Rist C., Wintersperger B., et al. Clinical value of MDCT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients with a low pretest likelihood of significant disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 (2006) 1659-1668
24. Robbins S., Cotran R., and Kumar V. Pathologic basis of disease. 6th ed. (1999), WB Saunders, Philadelphia 645
25. Moon C.H., and Nanavati V.I. Multi-stent approach in the treatment of acute dissection of the left internal mammary artery. J Invasive Cardiol 11 (1999) 248-250