Haloperidol, dynamics of choice, and the parameters of the matching law

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 75, Issue 2 SPEC. ISS., 2007, Pages 206-212

  Aparicio, Carlos F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Haloperidol; Magnitude of reinforcer; Matching law; Rats

Indexed keywords

DOPAMINE RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; HALOPERIDOL;

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; DRUG; FOOD; RODENT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG RESPONSE; MALE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PROBABILITY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT;

RATTUS;

EID: 34247201443     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aparicio C.F. Assessing haloperidol in rats with the barrier choice paradigm. Suma Psicológica 5 (1998) 1-20
2. Aparicio C.F. The barrier choice paradigm: haloperidol reduces sensitivity to reinforcement. Behav. Process. 48 (1999) 57-67
3. Aparicio C.F. Adicción a drogas anti-psicosis: una evaluación de los efectos colaterales. Anuario de Investigación en Adicciones 2 (2001) 34-58
4. Aparicio C.F. Overmatching in rats: the barrier choice paradigm. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 75 (2001) 93-106
5. Aparicio C.F. Drogas anti-psicosis: efectos en la preferencia y la elección. Anuario de Investigación en Adicciones 3 (2002) 20-38
6. Aparicio C.F. Haloperidol affects choice and changes in preference: the barrier choice paradigm. Mex. J. Behav. Anal. 29 (2003) 31-61
7. Aparicio C.F. Effects of haloperidol in a variable reinforcement environment. Mex. J. Behav. Anal. 29 (2003) 119-232
8. Aparicio C.F., and Barajas I.A. Dynamic changes in reinforcement contingencies of a choice situation: steady state concurrent performance is required?. Mex. J. Behav. Anal. 28 (2002) 67-89
9. Aparicio C.F., and Baum W.M. Comparing locomotion with lever-press travel in an operant simulation of foraging. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 68 (1997) 177-192
10. Aparicio C.F., and Baum W.M. Depth analysis: a test for the molar approach to choice. Paper Presented at the Third International Conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis. Beijing, China (2005)
11. Aparicio C.F., and Baum W.M. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 86 (2006) 43-63
12. Aparicio C.F., and Cabrera F. Choice with multiple alternatives: the barrier choice paradigm. Mex. J. Behav. Anal. 27 (2001) 97-118
13. Aparicio C.F., and Velasco F. El paradigma de elección con barrera: evaluación del haloperidol con ocho alternativas de respuesta y dos requisitos de traslado. Universitas Psychological 2 (2003) 109-135
14. Baum W.M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 22 (1974) 231-242
15. Baum W.M. Choice, changeover, and travel. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 38 (1982) 35-49
16. Baum W.M., and Davison M. Choice in a variable environment: visit patterns in the dynamics of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 81 (2004) 85-127
17. Boelens H., and Kop P.F.M. Concurrent schedules: spatial separation of response alternatives. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 40 (1983) 35-45
18. Davison M. Choice, changeover, and travel: a quantitative model. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 55 (1991) 47-61
19. Davison M., and Baum W.M. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 74 (2000) 1-24
20. Davison M., and Baum W.M. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 77 (2002) 65-89
21. Davison M., and Baum W.M. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 80 (2003) 95-129
22. Epstein R. Amount consumed as a function of magazine-cycle duration. Behav. Anal. Lett. 1 (1981) 63-66
23. Fibiger H.C., Carter D.A., and Phillips A.G. Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by reward deficits rather than by reduced reward. Psychopharmacology 47 (1976) 21-27
24. Hoebel B.G. Neuroscience and motivation: pathways and peptides that define motivational systems. In: Atkinson R.C., Herrnstein R.J., Lindzey G., and Luce R.C. (Eds). Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology vol. 1 (1988), Wiley, New York 527-625
25. Ikemoto S., and Panksepp J. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in motivated behavior: a unifying interpretation with special reference to reward-seeking. Brain Res. Rev. 31 (1999) 6-41
26. Keller J.V., and Gollub L.R. Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 28 (1977) 145-153
27. Landon J., and Davison M. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 75 (2001) 207-234
28. Landon J., Davison M., and Ellife D. Concurrent schedules: reinforcement magnitude effects. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 79 (2003) 351-365
29. Pliskoff S.S., Ciceron R., and Nelson T.D. Local response-rate constancy on concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 29 (1978) 431-446
30. Salamone J.D. The actions of neuroleptic drugs on appetitive instrumental behaviors. In: Iversen L.L., Iverson S.D., and Snyder S.I.I. (Eds). Handbook of Psychopharmacology (1987), Plenum, New York 575-608
31. Salamone J.D., Arizzi M.N., Sandoval M.D., Cervone K.M., and Aberman J.E. Dopamine antagonists alter response allocation but do not suppress appetite for food in rats: contrasts between the effects of SKF 83566, raclopride, and fenfluramine on a concurrent choice task. Psychopharmacology 160 (2002) 371-380
32. Salamone J.D., Cousins M.S., and Snyder B.J. Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonica hypothesis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 21 (1997) 341-359
33. Schneider J.W. Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcement rate and magnitude. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 20 (1973) 461-471
34. Stubbs D.A., and Pliskoff S.S. Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 12 (1969) 887-895
35. Stubbs D.A., Pliskoff S.S., and Reid H.M. Concurrent schedules: a quantitative relation between changeover behavior and its consequences. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 27 (1977) 85-96
36. Todorov J.C. Interaction of frequency and magnitude of reinforcement on concurrent performance. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 19 (1973) 451-458
37. Todorov J.C., Hanna E.S., and Bittencourt de Sa M.C.N. Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: new data with a different procedure. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 41 (1984) 157-167
38. Tombaugh T.N., Tombaugh J., and Anisman H. Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance. Psychopharmacology 66 (1979) 219-225
39. Wise R.A. Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav. Brain Sci. 5 (1982) 39-88
40. Wise R.A. The anhedonia hypothesis: mark III. Behav. Brain Sci. 8 (1985) 178-186
41. Wise R.A., and Colle L.M. Pimozide attenuates free feeding: best score analysis reveals a motivational deficit. Psychopharmacology 84 (1984) 446-451
42. Wise R.A., Spindler J., de Wit H., and Gerber G.J. Neuroleptic-induced anhedonia in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. Science 201 (1978) 262-264