Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of sural nerve graft donor site

Medical Journal of Malaysia

Volumn 61, Issue SUPPL. B, 2006, Pages 13-17

  Ng, S S ^a   Kwan, Mun Keong ^a   Sara Ahmad, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTRE   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Qualitative; Quantitative; Sural nerve graft

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; NERVE GRAFT; NERVE INJURY; NERVE RECONSTRUCTION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRICK TEST; QUESTIONNAIRE; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SURAL NERVE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ULNAR NERVE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM; ARM INJURIES; BRACHIAL PLEXUS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSATION; SURAL NERVE; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34247197687     PISSN: 03005283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Myckatyn TM, Mackinnon SE. Surgical techniques of nerve grafting. (Standard/Vascularized/Allograft) Oper Tech Orthop. 2004; 14: 171-78.
2. Seddon HJ. Surgical Disorders of Peripheral Nerves. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1975.
3. Millesi H, Meissl G, Berger A. The interfascicular nerve grafting of the median and ulnar nerves. J Bone Joint Surg. 1972; 54A: 727-50.
4. Staniforth P, Fisher TR. The effects of sural nerve excision in autogenous nerve grafting. Hand. 1978; 10: 187.
5. Ehretsman RL, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE. Subjective recovery of nerve graft donor site. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 43: 606-12.
6. Miloro M, Stoner JA. Subjective Outcomes Following Sural Nerve Harvest. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63: 1150-54.
7. Fisher TR, Cox P. Sural nerve as autogenous nerve graft. J Bone & Joint Surg. 1974; 56(B): 571-72.
8. Livinston WK. Evidence of active invasion of denervated areas by sensory fibres from neighbouring nerves in man. J Neurosurg. 1947; 4: 140-45.
9. Leonard MH. Return of skin sensation in children without repair of nerves. Clin Orthop. 1973; 95: 273-77.
10. Robinson PP. Recession of sensory loss from the midline following trigeminal sensory root section: collateral sprouting from the normal side? Brain Res. 1983; 259: 177-80.
11. Aszmann OC, Muse V, Dellon AL. Evidence in support of collateral sprouting after sensory nerve resection. Ann Plast Surg. 1996; 37: 520-25.
12. Theriault M, Joseph D, Sutherland G, Zochodne DW. A prospective quantitative study of sensory deficits after whole sural nerve biopsies in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Surgical approach and the role collateral sprouting. Neurology. 1998; 50(2): 480-84.