Theoretical study on the sound absorption of electrolytic solutions. I. Theoretical formulation

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 126, Issue 14, 2007, Pages

  Yamaguchi, T ^a   Matsuoka, T ^a   Koda, S ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE ABSORPTION; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; ION SOURCES; VISCOSITY;

ION PAIRS; KUBO GREEN FORMULA; LANGEVIN EQUATION; SOUND ABSORPTION;

ELECTROLYTIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 34247186423     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.2722261     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. J. O'M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry (Plenum, New York, 1970), Vol. 1.
2. J. Stuehr and E. Yeager, in Physical Acoustics, edited by W. P. Mason (Academic, New York, 1965), Vol. II, Pt. A, Chap. 8.
3. M. Eigen and K. Tamm, Z. Elektrochem. 66, 93, 107 (1962).
4. L. G. Jackopin and E. Yeager, J. Phys. Chem. 74, 3766 (1970).
5. P. Hemmes, J. Phys. Chem. 76, 895 (1972).
6. T. Yamaguchi, T. Matsuoka, and S. Koda, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 034504 (2005).
7. R. Zwanzig, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 16, 67 (1965).
8. U. Balucani and M. Zoppi, Dynamics of the Liquid State (Clarendon, Oxford, 1994).
9. J. P. Boon and S. Yip, Molecular Hydrodynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980).
10. J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of Simple Liquids, 2nd ed. (Academic, London, 1990).
11. Kagaku Binran Kisohen, 5th ed., edited by The Japanese Society of Chemistry (Marubun, Tokyo, 2004).
12. H. J. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269 (1987).
13. J. Aqvist, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 8021 (1990).
14. Y. Marcus, Chem. Rev. (Washington, D.C.) 88, 1475 (1988).
15. Although we have tried to solve the integral equation with ions of ±2e, we found that the concentration fluctuation at low wave number increased to diverge with increasing the ionic charge. The divergence of long wavelength concentration fluctuation suggests the phase instability, and we cannot say at present whether the ionic models or the theoretical approximations are responsible to the unexpected instability.
16. F. Hirata, Molecular Theory of Salvation (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003).
17. J. S. Perkyns and B. M. Pettitt, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7656 (1992).
18. A. Kovalenko, S. Ten-no, and F. Hirata, J. Comput. Chem. 20, 928 (1999).
19. R. Buchner, T. Chen, and G. Hefter, J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 2365 (2004).
20. The dielectric constant required in the DRISM/HNC calculation involves only the correlations between solvent molecules. On the other hand, both the ions and solvents response to the external electric fields, and the contribution of the solvent cannot be determined by the static or low-frequency measurements due to the large conductive response of ions. An experimental method to extract the response of solvent is the relaxation measurement, where the separation of the contributions of solvent and ion is performed according to the difference in the relaxation times. Theoretical and computational studies performed by Chandra et al., show that the dielectric constant determined by the relaxation method is determined almost exclusively by the static correlation between solvent molecules in the cases of simple model systems. [A. Chandra, D. Wei, and G. N. Patey, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 4959 (1993);
21. A. Chandra and G. N. Patey, ibid. 100, 8385 (1994)].
22. High-Pressure Properties of Matter, Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group 4, Vol. 4, edited by G. Beggerow and K. Schäfer (Springer, Berlin, 1980).
23. L. H. Hall, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 704 (1952).
24. M. Eigen, G. Kurtze, and K. Tamm, Z. Elektrochem. 57, 103 (1953).
25. G. Kurtze and K. Tamm, Acustica 3, 33 (1953).
26. K. Tamm, G. Kurtze, and H. Kaiser, Acustica 4, 381 (1954).
27. D. A. Bies, J. Chem. Phys. 23, 428 (1955).
28. M. Eigen, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 24, 25 (1957).
29. A. Bechtler, K. G. Breitschwerdt, and K. Tamm, J. Chem. Phys. 52, 2975 (1970).