Cost-benefit analysis of river restoration in Denmark

Cost-Benefit Analysis and Water Resources Management

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 124-150

  Dubgaard, Alex ^a   Kallesøe, Mikkel F ^b   Ladenburg, Jacob ^a   Petersen, Mads Lyngby ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b World Conservation Union(IUCN)   (Sri Lanka)

^c Danish Environmental Assessment Institute   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247171034     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Brouwer, R. (2000), 'Environmental value transfer: state of the art and future prospects', Ecological Economics, 32, 137-152.
2. Carson, R.T., Flores, N.E. and Meade, N.F. (2001), 'Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence', Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 173-210.
3. Christiansen, N. (2001), Personal communication. Oxbøl Forest District, Denmark.
4. COWI (1997), Skjern Å Naturprojekt, projektforslag. Natur, hydraulik og resumé af anlægsteknik (Skjern River Project. Nature, Hydraulics and Summary of Construction Techniques). April.
5. COWI (1998), Skjern Å Naturprojekt, Samfundsøkonomisk Analyse (Skjern River Project, a Socio-economic Analysis). Danish Forest and Nature Agency.
6. Danish Forest and Nature Agency (1998), Miljøvurdering af Skjern Å naturprojekt. Teknisk Environmental Impact redegørelse (Environmental Assessment of the Skjern River Project, Technical Report).
7. Danish Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Economics (2000), Vandmiljøplanen II, Økonomisk midtvejsevaluering [Aquatic Environment Plan II, Economic Assessment Report]. December.
8. Desvousges, W.H., Naughton, M.C. and Parsons, G.R. (1992), 'Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies', Water Resources Research, 28 (3), 675-683.
9. Dubgaard, A. (1996), Economic Valuation of Recreation in Mols Bjerge. SØM Publication no. 11 (research report). AKF, Copenhagen.
10. Freeman, A.M. (1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Theory and Methods, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
11. Gregersen, P. (2001), Personal communication. Nature guide, Ringkøbing County.
12. Gren, I.-M., Elofsson, K. and Jannke, P. (1997), 'Cost-effective nutrient reductions to the Baltic Sea', Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, 341-362.
13. Hanemann, W.M. (1995), 'Contingent valuation and economics', in K.G. Willis and J.T. Corkindale (eds), Environmental Valuation. New Perspectives, CAB International, Wallingford.
14. Jensen, J.H. (2001), Personal communication. Assistant forester (Forstfuldmægtig), Danish Forest and Nature Agency.
15. Johansson, P.-O. (1993), Cost-Benefit Analysis of EnvironmentalChange, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. KOFE (1998), Kendelser om fast ejendom (Decisions on Real Property) 4/1998, vol. 23. Danish Association of Lawyers and Economists.
17. Krutilla, J.V. (1967), 'Conservation reconsidered', American Economic Review, 57 (4), 777-786.
18. Loomis, J.B. and White, D.S. (1996), 'Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: summary and meta-analysis', Ecological Economics, 18 (1996), 197-206.
19. Ministry of Agriculture (1997), Konsekvenser af Nitratdirektivets gennemførelse i Danmark. (Consequences of the Implementation of the Nitrate-directive in Denmark). Ministry of Agriculture, Copenhagen.
20. Minister of the Environment (Hans Christian Schmidt) (2002), 'Redegørelse af 9/10 02 om Danmarks natur-ansvaret for at beskytte den og glæden ved at benytte den' (Statement to Parliament about the protection of Denmark's natural environment). http://www.folketinget.dk/?/Samling/20021/redegoerelse/R3.htm.
21. Ministry of the Environment and Energy (2001a), 'Notat med konkrete tal vedr. kvælstoftilbageholdelsen i Skjern Å-projektet' (Note on specific figures regarding nitrogen retention by the Skjern River project). January.
22. Ministry of the Environment and Energy (2001b), 'Brugergruppen for Skjern Å Naturprojekt. Indstilling til miljø-og energiministeren om den fremtidige, rekreative anvendelse af Skjern Å Naturprojekt' (Proposals from the user group to the Ministry of the Environment and Energy regarding public access and use of the Skjern River Project area). http://www.sns.dk/natur/netpub/Skjernaa/indgrup.htm.
23. Ministry of Finance (1999), 'Vejledning i udarbejdelse af samfundsøkonomiske konsekvensvurdering' (Economic guidelines for policy and project assessment). http://www.fm.dk/udgivelser/publikationer/vejlsamf99/index.htm.
24. Ministry of Finance (Finansministeriet) (2003), 'En omkostningseffektiv klimastrategi' (A cost-efficient climate strategy), Finansministeriet, February.http://www.fm.dk/db/filarkiv/7489/web.pdf.
25. Mishan, E.J. (1972), Elements of Cost-Benefit Analysis, George Allen and Unwin, London.
26. Møller, F., Andersen, S.P., Grau, P., Huusom, H., Madsen, T., Nielsen, J. and Strandmark, L. (2000), Samfundsøkonomisk vurdering af miljøprojekter (Economic assessment of environmental projects). National Environmental Research Institute, Danish Environmental Protection Agency and Danish Forest and Nature Agency.
27. Penn, T. (2002), 'A summary of the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations under the United States Oil Pollution Act'. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/environment/liability/tp_enveco.pdf.
28. Schou, J.S, Møller, F. and Birr-Pedersen, K. (2001), Omkostninger ved udvalgte landbrugstiltag til styrkelse af biodiversiteten i Danmark (Costs of Particular Agricultural Initiatives for the Improvement of Biodiversity in Denmark). National Environmental Research Institute.
29. Toivonen, A.-L., Appelblad, H., Bengtsson, B., Geertz-Hansen, P., Gudbergsson, G., Kristofersson, D., Kyrkjebø, H., Navrud, S., Roth, E., Tuunainen, P. and Weissglas, G. (2000), Economic Value of Recreational Fisheries in the Nordic Countries, TemaNord 2000:604, Nordic Council of Ministers.
30. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2000), 'Guidelines for preparing economic analysis'. http://www.epa.gov/economics.
31. US OMB (Office of Management and Budget) (2000), 'Guidelines to standardize measures of costs and benefits and the format of accounting statements', M-00-08, 22 March. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/2000.html.
32. Viborg County (1996), Sætninger, Sænkning af jordoverfladen på vandløbsnære arealer efter gennemført hovedafvanding, undersøgt på syv delarealer ved fem vandløb i Viborg Amt (Shrinkage and Lowering of the Ground Surface on Land Near Streams after Drainage, Investigated for Seven Areas at Five Streams in Viborg County). Viborg Amt, Teknik og Miljø (Viborg County).
33. Wiborg, I. (2001), Personal communication. Consultant, Danish Agricultural Advisory Centre. Skejby.
34. Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D., Benson, J.F. and Carter, M. (1996), 'Benefits and costs of the wildlife enhancement scheme: a case study of the Pevensey Levels', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 39 (3), 387-401.