Thermodynamic comprehension of the effect of basic ash compositions on gaseous mercury transformation

Energy and Fuels

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 501-505

  Chen, Lei ^a   Zhuo, Yuqun ^a   Zhao, Xianglong ^a   Yao, Qiang ^a   Zhang, Liang ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLUE GASES; FLY ASH; LIME; OXIDATION; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; PHASE TRANSITIONS; THERMODYNAMICS;

BASIC ASH COMPOSITIONS; GASEOUS MERCURY TRANSFORMATION; MERCURY OXIDATION; THERMODYNAMIC COMPREHENSION; THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM;

MERCURY (METAL);

EID: 34247163671     PISSN: 08870624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ef060409v     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. U.S. EPA. A Study of Hazardous Air Pollutions from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units: Final Report to Congress; EPA-453/R-98-004a; U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., Feb 1998.
2. U.S. EPA. Mercury Study Report to Congress; EPA-452/R-97-003; U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., Dec 1997.
3. U.S. EPA. Clean Air Mercury Rule; http://www.epa.gov/mercuryrule, Mar 15, 2005.
4. Pavlish, J. H.; Sondreal, E. A.; Mann, M. D. et al. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82, 89-165.
5. Fujiwara, N.; Fujita, Y.; Tomura, K. et al. Fuel 2002, 81, 2045-2052.
6. Niksa, S.; Helble, J. J.; Fujiwara, N. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3701-3706.
7. Dunham, G. E.; Dewall, R. A.; Senior, C. L. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82, 197-213.
8. Galbreath, K. C.; Zygarlicke, C. J. Fuel Process. Technol. 2000, 65-66, 289-310.
9. Shemwell, B.; Levendis, Y. A.; Simons, G. A. Chemosphere 2001, 42, 785-796.
10. Lee, C. W.; Kilgroe, J. D.; Ghorishi, S. B. Speciation of mercury in the presence of coal and waste combustion fly ashes. The 93rd Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association; Salt Lake City, UT, June 2000; pp 18-22.
11. Burcat, A.; Rucic, B. Third Millennium Ideal Gas and Condensed Phase Thermochemical Database for Combustion with Updates from Active Thermochemical Tables. Argonne National Laboratory and Israel Institute of Technology, 2005.
12. Frandsen, F.; Dam-Johansen, K.; Rasmussen, P. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1994, 20, 115-138.
13. Barin, I. Thermochemical Data of Pure Substances (Chinese Edition), 1st ed.; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2003; Vol. 1, pp 819-824.
14. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Source (Ontario Hydro Method), Designation: D 6784-02.
15. Chen, L.; Duan, Y.; Zhuo, Y. et al. Mercury transformation across particulate control devices in six power plants of China: The co-effect of chlorine and ash composition. Fuel, manuscript accepted for publication.
16. Senior, C. L.; Helble, J. J.; Sarofim, A. F. Predicting the speciation of mercury emission from coal-fired power plants. Proceedings of the Air Quality II: Mercury, Trace Elements, and Particulate Matter Conference; McLean, VA, Sept 19-21, 2000, paper A 5-2.