Dynamic measures of visual function and their relationship to self-report of visual functioning

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 4762-4766

  Freeman, Ellen E ^a,b   Muñoz, Beatrix ^a   Turano, Kathleen A ^a   West, Sheila K ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY VISION SCALE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DYNAMIC EXERCISE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERFEROMETRY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL THRESHOLD; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF DISCLOSURE; VISION TEST; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF DISCLOSURE; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34247149048     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0436     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:819-825.
2. Rubin GS, West SK, Munoz B, et al. A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 199738:557-568.
3. Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang GH, et al. The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:64-72.
4. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale': a measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30:1111-1126.
5. Turano K, Wang X. Motion thresholds in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2411-2422.
6. Westcott MC, Fitzke FW, Viswanathan AC, Hitchings RA. Response time prolongation for a motion stimulus in patients with glaucoma and its relationship with elevation of the motion threshold. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:289-295.
7. Herdman SJ, Tusa RJ, Blatt P, Suzuki A, Venuto PJ, Roberts D. Computerized dynamic visual acuity test in the assessment of vestibular deficits. Am J Otol. 1998;19:790-796.
8. Long GM, Riggs CA. Training effects on dynamic visual acuity with free-head viewing. Perception. 1991;20:363-371.
9. Herdman SJ, Schubert MC, Das VE, Tusa RJ. Recovery of dynamic visual acuity in unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:819-824.
10. West SK, Munoz B, Rubin GS, et al. Function and visual impairment in a population-based study of older adults. The SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:72-82.
11. West SK, Rubin GS, Broman AT, Munoz B, Bandeen-Roche K, Turano K. How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? The SEE Project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:774-780.
12. Munoz B, West S, Rubin GS, Schein OD, Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K. Who participates in population based studies of visual impairment? The Salisbury Eye Evaluation project experience. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9:53-59.
13. Ferris FL 3rd, Kassoff A, Bresnick GH, Bailey I. New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982;94:91-96.
14. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:422-432.
15. Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA. Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2212-2221.
16. Valbuena M, Bandeen-Roche K, Rubin GS, Munoz B, West SK. Self-reported assessment of visual function in a population-based study: the SEE project. Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:280-288.
17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189-198.
18. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med. 1979;9:139-145.
19. Cleveland WS. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc. 1979;74:829-836.
20. Peters BT, Bloomberg JJ. Dynamic visual acuity using "far" and "near" targets. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125:353-357.