On the L2 and the H1 couplings for an overlapping domain decomposition method using Lagrange multipliers

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 322-350

  Guidault, P A ^a   Belytschko, T ^a  

^a Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridging domain method; Domain decomposition; Lagrange multipliers; Localized phenomena; Multiscale

Indexed keywords

CANTILEVER BEAMS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; SHEAR STRESS; TENSILE TESTING;

BRIDGING-DOMAIN METHOD; LOCALIZED PHENOMENA; VOLUME COUPLING;

DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS;

CANTILEVER BEAMS; DOMAIN DECOMPOSITION METHODS; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; SHEAR STRESS; TENSILE TESTING;

EID: 34247146274     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1882     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bernardi C, Maday Y, Patera T. A new nonconforming approach to domain decomposition: the Mortar element method. Non-linear Partial Differential Equations and their Applications. Collège de France seminar, Pitman: London, 1990; 13-51.
2. Belgacem FB. The Mortar finite element method with Lagrange multipliers. Numerische Mathematik 1999; 84:173-197.
3. Brezzi F, Marini LD. Error estimates for the three-field formulation with bubble stabilization. Mathematics of Computation 2001; 70:911-934.
4. Brezzi F, Marini LD. The three-eld formulation for elasticity problems. GAMM Mitteilungen 2005; 28:124-153.
5. Bertoluzza S, Brezzi F, Marini LD, Sangalli G. Nonmatching grids and Lagrange multipliers. In Selected Papers of the 15th International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods, 2003, Kornhuber F, Ralf et al. (eds), Springer. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 40. 2005; 3-18.
6. Park KC, Felippa CA. A variational principle for the formulation of partitioned structural systems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2000; 47:395-418.
7. Farhat C, Géradin M. Using a reduced number of Lagrange multipliers for assembling parallel incomplete field finite element approximations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 97:333-354.
8. Rixen D, Farhat C, Géradin M. A two-step hybrid method for the static and dynamic analysis of substructure problems with conforming and non-conforming interfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 154:229-264.
9. Babuška I. The finite element method with Lagrangian multipliers. Numerische Mathematik 1973; 20:179-192.
10. Brezzi F. On the uniqueness and approximation of saddle-point problems arising from Lagrangian multipliers. Revue Française d'Automatique, Informatique et Recherche Opérationnelle, R.2, August 1974; 129-151.
11. Brezzi F, Fortin M. Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. Springer: New York, 1991.
12. Ben Dhia H. Multiscale mechanical problems: the Arlequin method. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série II b 1998; 326:899-904.
13. Ben Dhia H, Rateau G. Analyse mathématique de la méthode Arlequin mixte. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I 2001; 332:649-654.
14. Ben Dhia H, Rateau G. Application of the Arlequin method to some structures with defects. Revue Européenne des éléments finis 2002; 11(2-4):291-304.
15. Ben Dhia H, Rateau G. The Arlequin method as a flexible engineering design tool. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2005; 62:1442-1462.
16. Stegger JL. The Chimera method of flow simulation. Workshop on Applied CFD, University of Tennessee Space Institute, August 1991.
17. Brezzi F, Lions JL, Pironneau O. Analysis of a Chimera method. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Série I 2001; 332:655-660.
18. Rudd RE, Broughton JQ. Concurrent coupling of length scales in solid state systems. Physica Status Solidi B - Basic Research 2000; 217:251-291.
19. Abraham FF, Broughton JQ, Bernstein N, Kaxiras E. Spanning the length scales in dynamic simulation. Computational Physics 1998; 12(6):538-546.
20. Broughton JQ, Abraham FF, Bernstein N, Kaxiras E. Concurrent coupling of length scales: methodology and application. Physical Review B 1999; 60(4):2391-2403.
21. Belytschko T, Xiao SP. Coupling methods for continuum model with molecular model. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering 2003; 1(1): 115-126.
22. Xiao SP, Belytschko T. A bridging domain method for coupling continua with molecular dynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2004; 193:1645-1669.
23. Wagner GJ, Liu WK. Coupling of atomistic and continuum simulations using a bridging scale decomposition. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 190(1):249-274.
24. Zhang SL, Mielke SL, Khare R, Troya D, Ruoff RS, Schatz GC, Belytschko T. Mechanics of defects in carbon nanotubes: atomistic and multiscale simulations. Physical Review B 2005; 71(11):Art. No. 115403.
25. Arroyo M, Belytschko T. Finite element methods for the non-linear mechanics of crystalline sheets and nanotubes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2004; 59(3):419-456.
26. Guidault P-A, Allix O, Champaney L, Navarro J-P. A two-scale approach with homogenization for the computation of cracked structures. Computers and Structures, in press.
27. Ladevèze P, Simmonds J. New concepts for linear beam theory with arbitrary geometry and loading. European Journal of Mechanics - A/ Solids 1998; 17(3):377-402.
28. Adams RA. Sobolev Spaces. Academic Press: New York, 1975.
29. Ugural AC, Fenster SK. Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity (3rd edn). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995.
30. Ewalds H, Wanhill R. Fracture Mechanics. Edward Arnold: New York, 1989.
31. Yau J, Wang S, Corten H. A mixed-mode crack analysis of isotropic solids using conservation laws of elasticity. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1980; 47:335-341.
32. Shih CF, Asaro RJ. Elastic-plastic analysis of cracks on bimaterial interfaces: Part i - small scale yielding. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1988; 55:299-316.