The "Measuring Outcomes of Clinical Connectivity" (MOCC) trial: Investigating data entry errors in the electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN)

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 151-159

  Fontaine, Patricia ^a,b   Mendenhall, Tai J ^a   Peterson, Kevin ^a   Speedie, Stuart M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Department of Family Medicine and Community Health ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RACE DIFFERENCE;

AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34247141603     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060069     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Peterson K, Fontaine P, Speedie S. The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:93-7.
2. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Computerized systems used in clinical trials. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration 1999.
3. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992;112:155-9.
4. Kinkman MS, Green LA. Using ICPC in a computer-based primary care information system. Fam Med 1995;27:449-56.
5. Horbar JD, Leahy KA. An assessment of data quality in the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network database. Control Clin Trials 1995;16:51-61.
6. Goldberg S, Ancukiewicz M, Niemierko A. The impact of data entry errors on the findings in radiation oncology research. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005;63:S191-S192.
7. Gibson D, Harvey AJ, Everett V, Parmar HKB. Is double data entry necessary? The CHART trials. Control Clin Trials 1994;15:482-8.
8. Kreher NE, Sesney JW. Accuracy of on-site data entry in a rural primary care research network. Fam Med 1995;27:457-9.
9. Samuels RC, Appel L, Reddy SI, Tilson RS. Improving accuracy in a computerized immunization registry. Ambul Pediatr 2002;2:187-2.
10. Van den Broeck J, Cunningham SA, Eeckels R, Herbst K. Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing and editing data abnormalities. PloS Med 2005;2:966-70.
11. Neaton JD, Duchene AG, Svendsen KH, Wentworth D. An examination of the efficiency of some quality assurance methods commonly employed in clinical trials. Stat Med 1990;9:115-24.
12. Kawado M, Hinotsu S, Matasuyma Y, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S, Ohashi Y. A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. Control Clin Trials 2003;24:560-9.