Binaural processing in children using bilateral cochlear implants

NeuroReport

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 613-617

  Gordon, Karen A ^a,b   Valero, Jerome ^a   Papsin, Blake C ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory; Binaural interaction; Brainstem; Deafness; Electrical stimulation; Evoked potentials; Hearing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINAURAL HEARING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; INNERVATION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY, BRAIN STEM; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INFANT; REACTION TIME; SOUND LOCALIZATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34247137278     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280b10c15     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. McConkey Robbins A, Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kishon-Rabin L. Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory skill development in infants and toddlers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130:570-574.
2. Harrison RV, Gordon KA, Mount RJ. Is there a critical period for cochlear implantation in congenitally deaf children? Analyses of hearing and speech perception performance after implantation. Dev Psychobiol 2005; 46:252-261.
3. Manrique M, Cervera-Paz FJ, Huarte A, Molina M. Prospective long-term auditory results of cochlear implantation in prelinguistically deafened children: the importance of early implantation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2004; 124:55-63.
4. Svirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol 2004; 9:224-233.
5. Tobey EA, Geers AE, Brenner C, Altuna D, Gabbert G. Factors associated with development of speech production skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (1 Suppl):36S-45S.
6. Geers A, Brenner C, Davidson L. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear 2003; 24 (1 Suppl):24S-35S.
7. Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2005; 6:19-27.
8. Nadol JB Jr. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 117 (3 Pt 1):220-228.
9. Litovsky RY, Johnstone PM, Godar S, Agrawal S, Parkinson A, Peters R, Lake J. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: localization acuity measured with minimum audible angle. Ear Hear 2006; 27:43-59
10. Bauer PW, Sharma A, Martin K, Dorman M. Central auditory development in children with bilateral cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006; 132:1133-1136.
11. Kuhn-Inacker H, Shehata-Dieler W, Muller J, Helms J. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68:1257-1266.
12. Senn P, Kompis M, Vischer M, Haeusler R. Minimum audible angle, just noticeable interaural differences and speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implants using clinical speech processors. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10:342-352.
13. van Hoesel RJ. Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2004; 9:234-246.
14. Cone-Wesson B, Ma E, Fowler CG. Effect of stimulus level and frequency on ABR and MLR binaural interaction in human neonates. Hear Res 1997; 106:163-178.
15. Goksoy C, Demirtas S, Yagcioglu S, Ungan P. Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural interaction component of the guinea pig brainstem responses. Brain Res 2005; 1054:183-191.
16. Ungan P, Yagcioglu S, Ozmen B. Interaural delay-dependent changes in the binaural difference potential in cat auditory brainstem response: implications about the origin of the binaural interaction component. Hear Res 1997; 106:66-82.
17. Jiang ZD, Tierney TS. Binaural interaction in human neonatal auditory brainstem. Pediatr Res 1996; 39 (4 Pt 1):708-714.
18. Furst M, Bresloff I, Levine RA, Merlob PL, Attias JJ. Interaural time coincidence detectors are present at birth: evidence from binaural interaction. Hear Res 2004; 187:63-72.
19. McPherson DL, Starr A. Binaural interaction in auditory evoked potentials: brainstem, middle- and long-latency components. Hear Res 1993; 66:91-98.
20. Brantberg K, Hansson H, Fransson P, Rosenhall U. The binaural interaction component in human ABR is stable within the 0- to 1-ms range of interaural time differences. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4:88-94.
21. Smith ZM, Delgutte B. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007; 8:134-151.
22. Thai-Van H, Gallego S, Truy E, Veuillet E, Collet L. Electrophysiological findings in two bilateral cochlear implant cases: does the duration of deafness affect electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111:1008-1014.
23. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brainstem in children who use cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2003; 24:485-500.
24. Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11:7-23.
25. Thai-Van H, Cozma S, Boutitie F, Disant F, Truy E, Collet L. The pattern of auditory brainstem response wave V maturation in cochlear implanted children. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118:676-689.