Artificial neural network application to estimate kinematic soil pile interaction response parameters

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 27, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 892-905

  Ahmad, Irshad ^a   Hesham El Naggar, M ^b   Khan, Akhtar Naeem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Artificial neural network; Kinematic moment; Pile; Winkler model

Indexed keywords

BENDING MOMENTS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PILE FOUNDATIONS; STIFFNESS;

KINEMATIC MOMENT; WINKLER FORMULATION;

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BENDING; KINEMATICS; PILE RESPONSE; RESPONSE ANALYSIS; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; WAVE DIFFRACTION; WINKLER FOUNDATION;

EID: 34247132993     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ahmad I., and Akhtar N.K. Kinematic seismic response of piles-importance and modeling. GeoCongress 2006: geotechnical engineering in the information technology age (2006)
2. Mizuno H. Pile damage during earthquakes in Japan. In: Nogami T, editor. Dynamic response of pile foundations. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers; 1987. p. 53-78.
3. Margason E. Pile bending during earthquakes. Lecture, 6 March 1975; ASCE-UC/Berkeley seminar on design construction and performance of deep foundations (unpublished).
4. Dobry R, O'Rourke MJ. In: Flores-Berrones R, Whitman RV, editors. Discussion on seismic response of end-bearing piles, vol. 109. ASCE, New York. J Geotech Eng Div 1983.
5. NEHERP. Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Parts 1 and 2, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC; 1987.
6. Nikolauo A, Mylonakis G, Gazetas G. Kinematic bending moments in seismically stressed piles. NCEER technical report, Buffalo, NY; 1995.
7. Nikolaou A, Gazetas G. Seismic design procedure for kinematically stressed piles. In: Seco e Pinto, editor. Seismic behavior of ground and geotechnical structures, Balkema, Rotterdam; 1997.
8. Mylonakis G. Simplified model for seismic pile bending at soil layer interfaces. Soils Found 41 4 (2001) 47-58
9. Gazetas G, Fan K, Tazoh T, Shimizu K, Kavvadas M, Makris N. Seismic pile-group-structure interaction. Piles under dynamic loads, Geotechnical special publication no. 34, 1992. p. 56-93.
10. Pender MJ. Aseimic pile foundation design and analysis. Bulletin of the New Zealand national society for earthquake engineering 26 1 (1993) 49-159
11. Kavvadas M., and Gazetas G. Kinematic seismic response and bending of free-head piles in layered soil. Geotechnique 43 2 (1993) 207-222
12. Gazetas G., and Dobry R. Horizontal response of piles in layered soils. J Geotech Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 110 1 (1984) 20-40
13. Gazetas G., and Dobry R. Simple radiation damping model for piles and footings. Horizontal response of piles in layered soils. J Geotech Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng 110 6 (1984) 937-956
14. Garrett Jr. JH. Where and why artificial neural networks are applicable in civil engineering. J Comput Civ Eng ASCE 8 2 (1994) 129-130
15. Ahmad I, Khan AN, El Naggar MH. Neural network for evaluating shear capacity of concrete in RC beams. Third international conference on construction materials: performance, innovations and structural implications, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 22-24, 2005.
16. Bohigas AC., and Mari AR. Shear design procedure for reinforced normal and high-strength concrete beams using artificial neural networks. Part-I beams without stirrups. Eng Struct 26 7 (2004) 917-926
17. Seleemah AA. A neural network model for predicting maximum shear capacity of concrete beams without transverse reinforcement. Can J Civil Eng 32 4 (2005) 644-657
18. El-Chabib H., Nehdi M., and Said A. Predicting shear capacity of NSC and HSC slender beams without stirrups using artificial intelligence. Comput Concr 2 1 (2005)
19. Najjar YM, Ali HE. CPT-based liquefaction potential assessment: a neuronet approach. Geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics III, Geotechnical special publication no. 75, vol. 2, 1998. p. 552-3.
20. Goh ATC. Empirical design in geotechnics using neural networks. Geotechnique 45 4 (1995) 709-714
21. Gerolymos N., Apostolou M., and Gazetas G. Neural network analysis of overturning response under near-fault type excitation. Earthquake Eng Eng Vib 4 2 (2005) 213-228
22. Hagan MT., Demuth HB., and Beale M. Neural network design (1996), PWS, Boston