Regional policy models for forest biodiversity analysis: Lessons from coastal Oregon

Ecological Applications

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 81-90

  Johnson, K Norman ^a   Duncan, Sally ^a   Spies, Thomas A ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Anticipatory assessments; Mixed owner landscapes; Political processes; Regional ecosystem perspectives; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY POLICY; LANDOWNERSHIP; POLICY ANALYSIS; POLITICAL CONFLICT; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; REGIONAL POLICY;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TREE; UNITED STATES;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; OREGON; OWNERSHIP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TREES;

NORTH AMERICA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247128572     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0081:RPMFFB]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Baker, J. P., D. W. Hulse, S. V. Gregory, D. White, J. Van Sickle, P. Berger, D. Dole, and N. H. Schumaker. 2004. Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications 14:313-324.
2. Benda, L., N. L. Poff, C. Tague, M. A. Palmer, J. Pizzuto, S. Cooper, E. Stanley, and G. Moglen. 2002. How to avoid train wrecks when using science in environmental problem solving. BioScience 52(12):1127-1137.
3. Beschta, R. L., J. J. Rhodes, J. B. Kuffmn, R. E. Gresswell, G. W. Minshall, J. R. Krr, D. A. Perry, F. R. Hauer, and C. A. Frissell. 2004. Postfire management on forested public lands of the western United States. Conservation Biology 18:957-967.
4. Burnett, K. M., G. H. Reeves, D. J. Miller, S. Clarke, K. Vance-Borland, and K. Christiansen. 2007. Distribution of salmon-habitat potential relative to landscape characteristics and implications for conservation. Ecological Applications 17:66-80.
5. Dana, S., and S. Fairfax. 1980. Forest and range policy. McGraw Hill, New York, New York, USA.
6. Duncan, S. L. 2006a. GIS technology in natural resource management: process as a tool of change. Cartographica 41:2-4.
7. Duncan, S. L. 2006b. Mapping whose reality? GIS and wild science. Public Understanding of Science 15:411-434.
8. Feldman, M. S. 1989. Order without design: information production and policy making. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
9. Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: an ecological, economic, and social assessment. Joint publication of the U.S. Forest Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. Forest Practice Advisory Committee. 2000. Report of the forest practices advisory committee. Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, Oregon, USA. 〈http://egov.oregon.gov/ODF/PRIVATE_FORESTS/docs/fp/FPACreport.pdf〉
11. Franklin, J. F. 1999. Preface. Pages ii-v in K. N. Johnson, F. J. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene, editors. Bioregional assessments: science at the crossroads of management and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
12. Geyer, K., and B. A. Shindler. 1994. Breaking the mold: global change, social responsibility, and natural resource policy: workshop summary. Research Report. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, Oregon, USA.
13. Gordon, J. C. 1999. History and assessments: punctuated nonequilibrium. Pages 43-54 in K. N. Johnson, F. J. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene, editors. Bioregional assessments: science at the crossroads of management and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
14. Hobbs, S., editor. 2003. Forest and stream management in the Oregon Coast Range. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
15. Hobbs, S. D., J. P. Hayes, R. L. Johnson, G. H. Reeves, and T. A. Spies. 2002. Forest and stream management in the Oregon Coast Range. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
16. Hulse, D., A. Branscomb, and S. G. Payne. 2004. Envisioning alternatives: using citizen guidance to map future land and water use. Ecological Applications 14:325-341.
17. Independent Multidisciplinary Science Team. 1999. Recovery of wild salmonids in western Oregon forests: Oregon Forest Practices Act rules and the measures in the Oregon Plan for salmon and watersheds. Technical Report 1999-1 to the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. Governor's Natural Resources Office, Salem, Oregon, USA. 〈http://www.fsl.orst.edu/imst〉
18. Irwin, A., and B. Wynne. 1996. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
19. Johnson, B. R., and R. Campbell. 1999. Ecology and participation in landscape-based planning within the Pacific Northwest. Policy Studies Journal 27:502-529.
20. Johnson, K. N., P. Bettinger, J. D. Kline, T. A. Spies, M. Lennette, G. Lettman, B. Garber-Yonts, and T. Larsen. 2007. Simulating forest structure, timber production, and socioeconomic effects in a multi-owner province. Ecological Applications 17:34-47.
21. Johnson, K. N., F. J. Swanson, M. Herring, and S. Greene, editors. 1999. Bioregional assessments: science at the crossroads of management and policy. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
22. Kemmis, D. 1990. Community and the politics of place. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
23. King, J. L., and K. L. Kraemer. 1993. Models, facts, and the policy process: the political ecology of estimated truth. Pages 353-360 in M. F. Goodchild, B. O. Parks, and L. T. Steyaert, editors. Environmental modeling with GIS. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
24. Lee, K. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
25. Lee, R., and D. Field. 2005. Community complexity: post-modern challenges to forest and natural resource management. Pages 291-303 in R. Lee and D. Field, editor. Communities and forests: where people meet the land. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
26. Mills, T. J., and R. N. Clark. 2001. Roles of research scientists in natural resource decision making. Forest Ecology and Management 153:189-198.
27. Morgan, M. G., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Ohmann, J. L., and M. J. Gregory. 2002. Predictive mapping of forest composition and structure with direct gradient analysis and nearest neighbor imputation in coastal Oregon, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32:725-741.
29. Palmer, M. A., et al. 2005. Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1(3):4-11.
30. Perry, D. A., M. G. Henjum, J. R. Karr, D. L. Bottom, J. C. Bednarz, S. G. Wright, S. A. Beckwitt, and E. Beckwitt. 1995. Interim protection for late-successional forests, fisheries, and watersheds: a summary of the report of the Eastside Forests Scientific Society Panel. Pages 103-114 in Proceedings, ecosystem management in western interior forests. Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington, USA.
31. Priest, S. H. 1995. Information equity, public understanding of science, and the biotechnology debate. Journal of Communication 45(1):39-54.
32. Sessions, J., P. Bettinger, R. Buckman, M. Newton, and J. Hamann. 2004. Hastening the return of complex forests following fire: the consequences of delay. Journal of Forestry 102(3):38-45.
33. Shindler, B. 2000. Landscape-level management: it's all about context. Journal of Forestry 98(12):10-14.
34. Spies, T. A., K. N. Johnson, K. M. Burnett, J. L. Ohmann, B. C. McComb, G. H. Reeves, P. Bettinger, J. D. Kline, and B. Garber-Yonts. 2007. Cumulative ecological and socioeconomic effects of forest policies in coastal Oregon. Ecological Applications 17:5-17.
35. Sturgis, P., and N. Allum. 2004. Science in society: reevaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13:55-74.
36. Thomas, J. W., E. D. Forsman, J. B. Lint, E. C. Meslow, B. R. Noon, and J. Verner. 1990. A conservation strategy for the northern spotted owl: a report of the Interagency Scientific Committee to address the conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl. USDA Forest. Service; USDI Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Portland, Oregon, USA.
37. Thomas, J. W., J. F. Franklin, J. Gordon, and K. N. Johnson. 2006. The Northwest Forest Plan: origins, components, implementation experience, and suggestions for change. Conservation Biology 20:277-287.
38. Thompson, J. R., K. N. Johnson, M. Lennette, T. A. Spies, and P. B. Bettinger. 2006. Historical disturbance regimes as a reference for forest policy in a multi-owner province, the Oregon Coast Range, USA: a simulation experiment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research: 36:401-417.
39. Tuan, Y. 1974. Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
40. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. National Forest System land and resource management planning: final rule (36 CFR 219). Federal Register 70(3):1055-1061.
41. Wear, D. N., M. G. Turner, and R. O. Flamm. 1996. Ecosystem management with multiple owners: landscape dynamics in a southern Appalachian watershed. Ecological Applications 6:1173-1188.
42. Weber, J. R., and C. S. Word. 2001. The communication process as evaluative context: what do non-scientists hear when scientists speak? BioScience 51(6):487-495.
43. Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2003. Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
44. Yosie, T. 2001. Science-based decision making at the crossroads. Vital Speeches of the Day 67(7):216-220.