Making connections to teaching practice: The role of boundary practices in instructional leadership

Educational Policy

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 369-396

  Coldren, Amy Franz ^a,b   Spillane, James P ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructional leadership; Tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247127904     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904805284121     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Blase, J., Blase, B. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers' perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35 (3). 349-378.
2. Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S., Easton, J. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3. Cohen, D.K., Ball, D.L. (1998). Instruction, capacity, and improvement (CPRE research report series RR-42). Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania: CPRE.
4. Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Diamond, J.B., Randolph, A., Spillane, J.P. (2004). Teachers' Expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology Education Quarterly, 35 (1). 75-98.
6. Fullan, M. (1997). What's worth fighting for in the principalship ? (2 nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario.
7. Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
8. Glaser, B., Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
9. Goldring, E., Cohen-Vogel, L. (1999, April). Supporting environments for instructional reform: The principal's role in a new century. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
10. Greenfield, W.D. (1995). Toward a theory of school administration: The centrality of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31 (1). 61-85.
11. Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30 (3). 35-48.
12. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86 (2). 217-247.
13. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J. (1987). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94 (5). 328-355.
14. Heck, R., Larson, T., Marcoulides, G. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
15. Krug, S.E. (1992). Instructional leadership: A constructivist perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28 (3). 430-443.
16. Lee, V., Smith, J.B. (2001). High school restructuring and student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.
17. Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
18. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15 (2). 4-14.
19. Spillane, J.P., Halverson, R., Diamond, J.B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Leadership, 30 (3). 1-6.
20. Spillane, J.P., Sherer, J.Z., Coldren, A.F. (2005). Distributed leadership: Leadership practice and the situation. In W. K. Hoy C. Miskel (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 149-167). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
21. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.