Simplicity and complexity in ecological data analysis

Ecology

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 56-62

  Murtaugh, Paul A ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analysis of variance; Correlated data; Mixed effects model; P value; Repeated measures; Statistics

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; DATA PROCESSING; ECOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYPRINIFORMES; ECOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ZOOPLANKTON;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CYPRINIFORMES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECOLOGY; RESEARCH DESIGN; ZOOPLANKTON;

EID: 34247122622     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[56:SACIED]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beschta, R. L., M. R. Pyles, A. E. Skaugset, and C. G. Surfleet. 2000. Peakflow responses to forest practices in the western Cascades of Oregon, USA. Journal of Hydrology 233:102-120.
2. Cleveland, W. S. 1981. LOWESS: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression. American Statistician 35:54.
3. Diggle, P., P. Heagerty, K.-Y. Liang, and S. Zeger. 2002. Analysis of longitudinal data. Second edition. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
4. Hurlbert, S. H. 1984. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54:187-211.
5. Jones, J. A. 2000. Hydrologic processes and peak discharge response to forest removal, regrowth, and roads in 10 small experimental basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resources Research 36:2621-2642.
6. Kuehl, R. O. 2002. Design of experiments: statistical principles of research design and analysis. Second edition. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California, USA.
7. Murtaugh, P. A. 1989. Size and species composition of zooplankton in experimental ponds with and without fishes. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 5:27-38.
8. Murtaugh, P. A. 2000. Paired intervention analysis in ecology. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 5:280-292.
9. O'Brien, P. C., and M. A. Shampo. 1988. Statistical considerations for performing multiple tests in a single experiment. 3. Repeated measures over time. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 63:918-920.
10. Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
11. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
12. Schluter, D. 1994, Experimental evidence that competition promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Science 266:798-801.
13. Stewart-Oaten, A. 1996, Problems in the analysis of environmental monitoring data. Pages 109-131 in R. J. Schmitt and C. W. Osenberg, editors. Detection of ecological impacts: conceptual issues and application in coastal marine habitats. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
14. Terwilliger, M. R., D. F. Markle, and J. Kann. 2003. Associations between water quality and daily growth of juvenile shortnose and Lost River suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:691-709.
15. Thomas, R. B., and W. F. Megahan. 1998, Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon: a second opinion. Water Resources Research 34:3393-3403.
16. Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002, Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth edition. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.