Experiments on quality evaluation of embedded software in Japan robot software design contest

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 551-560

  Washizaki, Hironori ^a   Kobayashi, Yasuhide ^b   Watanabe, Hiroyuki ^c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^b Afrel Inc   (Japan)

^c Ogis RI Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Embedded software development; Robot contest; Software design; Software model; Software quality

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA STRUCTURES; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; RELIABILITY THEORY; ROBOTICS;

EMBEDDED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE MODELS; SOFTWARE QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 34247114304     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Japan System House Association: Embedded Technology (ET) Software Design Robot Contest 2005, http://www.etrobo.jp/
2. The LEGO Group, LEGO Mindstorms, http://mindstorms.lego.com/
3. B.W. Boehm: A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement, Computer, Vol.21, No.5, 1988.
4. OMG: UML 2.0 Specification, 2004, http://www.uml.org/
5. Y. Kobayashi, T. Yamazaki, T. Futagami and H. Watanabe: Robot Contest as Software Engineering Education, Proc. IPSJ/SIGSE Embedded Software Symposium (ESS2004), 2004. (in Japanese)
6. D. West: Metaphor, Architecture, and XP, Proc. 3rd International Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2002.
7. J. Herbsleb, D. Root and J. Tomayko: The eXtreme Programming (XP) Metaphor and Software Architecture, CMU-CS-03-167, Carnegie Mellon University, 2003.
8. OMG: Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification, Version 1.1, 2005.
9. ISO/IEC TR. 9126-1: Software engineering - Product Quality - Part 1: Quality model, 2001.
10. ISO/IEC TR. 9126-2: Software engineering - Product Quality - Part 2: External metrics, 2003.
11. ISO/IEC TR. 9126-3: Software engineering - Product Quality - Part 3: Internal metrics, 2003.
12. K. Lee and S.J. Lee: A Quantitative Software Quality Evaluation Model for the Artifacts of Component Based Development, Proc. 6th International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Paralle/Distributed Computing, and 1st ACIS International Workshop on Self-Assembling Wireless Networks, 2005.
13. M. Lorenz and J. Kidd: Object-Oriented Software Metrics, Prentice Hall, 1994.
14. F.B. Abreu, M. Gonlao and R. Esteves: Toward the Design Quality Evaluation of Object-Oriented Software Systems, Proc. 5th International Conference on Software Quality, 1995.
15. R. Banker, S. Datar, C. Kemerer and D. Zweig: Software Complexity and Maintenance Costs, Communications of the ACM, Vol.36, No.11, 1993.
16. W.P. Stevens, G.J. Myers and L.L. Constantine: Structured Design, IBM Systems Journal, Vol.13, No.2, 1974.
17. A. Brown: An introduction to Model Driven Architecture, IBM developerWorks, May, 2004, http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/ library/3100.html
18. B. Selic: The Pragmatics of Model-Driven Development, IEEE Software, Vol.20, No.5, 2003.
19. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak and A. Peterson: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study, CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
20. OMG: UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time (version 1.1), 2005.
21. M. Marzolla and S. Balsamo: UML-PSI: The UML Performance Simulator, Proc. 1st International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 2004.
22. S. Balsamo, A.Di. Marco, P. Inverardiand M. Simeoni: Model-Based Performance Prediction in Software Development: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol.30, No.5, 2004.
23. M. Woodside, D.C. Petriu, D.B. Petriu, H. Shen, T. Israr and J. Merseguer: Performance by Unified Model Analysis (PUMA), Proc. 5th ACM Workshop on Software and Performance, 2005.
24. T. Winn and P. Calder: Is This a Pattern?, IEEE Software, Vol.19, No.1, 2002.
25. H. Washizaki, A. Kubo, A. Takasu and Y. Fukazawa: Relation Analysis among Patterns on Software Development Process, Proc. 6th International Conference on Product Focused Software Process Improvement, LNCS Vol.3547, 2005.
26. W.J. Brown, R.C. Malveau, H.W. McCormick and T.J. Mowbray: AntiPatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis, Wiley, 1998.
27. C.U. Smith and L.G. Williams: Software Performance AntiPatterns, Proc. 2nd International Workshop on Software and Performance, 2000.
28. B. Selic, G. Gullekson and P. Ward, Real-Time Object Oriented Modelling, John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
29. S.M. Yacoub, H.H. Ammar and R. Robinson: Dynamic Metrics for Object Oriented Designs, Proc. 6th International Software Metrics Symposium, 1999.
30. M. Genero, D. Miranda and M. Piattini: Defining Metrics for UML Statechart Diagrams in a Methodological Way, International Workshop on Conceptual Modeling Quality, 2003.