The IRB challenge for practice-based research: Strategies of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN)

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 181-187

  Graham, Deborah G ^a,b   Spano, Mindy S ^a   Manning, Brian ^a  

^a AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FAMILY MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; PATIENT RIGHT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247110989     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060110     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Academy of Family Physicians. National Research Network (2006).
2. Burman WJ, Reves RR, Cohn DL, Schooley RT. Breaking the camel's back: multicenter clinical trials and local institutional review boards. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:152-7.
3. McWilliams R, Hoover-Fong J, Hamosh A, Beck S, Beaty T, Cutting G. Problematic variation in local institutional review of a multicenter genetic epidemiology study. JAMA 2003;290:360-6.
4. Gold JL, Dewa CS. Institutional review boards and multisite studies in health services research: is there a better way? Health Serv Res 2005;40:291-307.
5. Green LA, Lowery JC, Kowalski CP, Wyszewianski L. Impact of institutional review board practice variation on observational health services research. Health Serv Res 2006;41:214-30.
6. Wolf LE, Croughan M, Lo B. The challenges of IRB review and human subjects protections in practice-based research. Med Care 2002;40:521-9.
7. Wolf LE, Waldren JF, Lo B. Human subjects issues and IRB review in practice-based research. Ann Fam Med 2005;3 Suppl 11:S30-7.
8. Graham DG, Pace WD, Kappus JA, et al. Institutional review board approval of practice-based research network patient safety studies. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005 Feb. Publication No. 050021 (3). p. 453-64.
9. Christoffel KK, Binns HJ, Stockman JA 3rd, et al. Practice-based research: opportunity and obstacles. Pediatrics 1988;82:399-406.
10. Dietrich AJ, O'Connor G, Keller A, et al. Will community physicians participate in rigorous studies of cancer control? The methodology and recruitment of a randomized trial of physician practices. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990;39:373-81.
11. Plane MB, Beasley JW, Wiesen P, McBride P, Underbakke G. Physician attitudes toward research study participation: a focus group. WMJ 1998;97:49-51.
12. Alternative models of IRB review. Washington (DC): The Office for Human Research and Protections, National Institutes of Health, the Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Workshop Summary Report; 2005.
13. 45 CFR § 46 (2005).
14. 45 CFR 164.501, 164.508, 164.512 (i) (2003)
15. Office for Human Research Protections [homepage on the Internet]. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. [updated 18 Oct 2006]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/.
16. CITI [homepage on the Internet]. Available from: https://www.citiprogram. org/default.asp.
17. Future of Family Medicine Project Leadership Committee. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:S3-32.