Corrigendum to "An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors?". [Energy Policy 35 (2007) 3792-3806] (DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.018);An integrated DEA PCA numerical taxonomy approach for energy efficiency assessment and consumption optimization in energy intensive manufacturing sectors

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 3792-3806

  Azadeh, A ^a   Amalnick, M S ^a   Ghaderi, S F ^a   Asadzadeh, S M ^a  

^a Center of Excellence for Intelligent Experimental Mechanics   (Iran)

Author keywords

Energy efficiency; Energy intensive manufacturing sectors; Optimization

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CRITICAL ENERGY CARRIERS; ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING SECTORS; NUMERICAL TAXONOMY; ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (CO);

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

CORRELATION; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY USE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; MANUFACTURING; NUMERICAL METHOD; OECD; OPTIMIZATION; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 34147213576     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.01.029     Document Type: Erratum

References (45)

1. Al-Subhi K.M., and Al-Harbi K.M. Optimization of staff numbers in the process industries: an application of DEA. International Journal of Manpower 21 1 (2000) 47-59
2. Andersen P., and Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (1993) 1261-1264
3. Azadeh M.A., and Jalal S. Identifying the economic importance of industrial sectors by multivariate analysis. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering 35 3 (2001) 437-449
4. Azadeh M.A., and Ebrahimipour A. An integrated approach for assessment and ranking of manufacturing systems based on machine performance. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 11 4 (2004) 349-363
5. Azadeh, M.A., Ghaderi, S.F., Asadzadeh, M., 2006. Performance assessment of energy consumption in Iranian chemical sectors. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Energy Management and Planning, June 20-21, Tehran, Iran.
6. Banker R.D., Charnes A., and Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30 (1984) 1078-1092
7. Bernard J.T., and Bruno C. The measurement of the energy intensity of manufacturing industries: a principal components analysis. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 221-233
8. Bevilacqua M., and Braglia M. Environmental efficiency analysis for ENI oil refineries. Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (2002) 85-92
9. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., and Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (1978) 429-444
10. Chauhan N.S., Mohapatra P.K.J., and Pandey K.P. Improving energy productivity in paddy production through benchmarking-an application of data envelopment analysis. Energy Conversion and Management 47 (2006) 1063-1085
11. Cooper W., Seiford L.M., and Tone K. Data envelopment analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models Applications References & DEA Solved Software (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
12. DOE, 1995. Measuring Energy Efficiency in the United States Economy: a Beginning, DOE-EIA, US Department of Energy, Washington.
13. Eichhammer W., and Mannsbart W. Industrial energy efficiency indicators for a European cross country comparison of energy efficiency in the manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 759-772
14. Farla J., Blok K., and Schipper L. Energy efficiency developments in the pulp and paper industry: A cross-country comparison using physical production data. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 745-758
15. Freeman S.L., Niefer M.J., and Roop J.M. Measuring industrial energy intensity: practical issues and problems. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 703-714
16. Hu J.L., and Kao C.H. Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies. Energy Policy 35 1 (2007) 373-382
17. Jahanshahloo G.R., Hosseinzadeh F., Shoja N., Sanei M., and Tohidi G. Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation 169 2 (2005) 897-904
18. Ma J., Evans D.G., Fuller R.J., and Stewart D.F. Technical efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry, International Journal of Production Economics 76 3 (2002) 293-312
19. Minhas R., and Jacobs E. Benefit segmentation by factor analysis: an improved method of targeting customers for financial services. International Journal of Bank Marketing (1996) 3-13
20. Odyssee, 2005. Definition of key energy Efficiency indicators. 〈http://www.ODYSSEE-indicators.org〉.
21. OECD/IEA, 1997. Indicators of energy use and Efficiency. OECD/IEA publication.
22. OECD/IEA, 2000. Energy consumption statistics in manufacturing industry 1990-1999. Information System on Industrial Structures (ISIS).
23. Phylipsen G.J.M., Blok K., and Worrel E. International comparisons of energy Efficiency. Methodologies for the manufacturing industry. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 715-725
24. Phylipsen G.J.M., Blok K., and Worrel E. Handbook on International Comparison of Energy Efficiency in the Manufacturing Industry (1998), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Netherlands
25. Post T., and Spronk J. Performance benchmarking using interactive data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (1999) 472-487
26. Premachandra I.M. A note on DEA versus principal component analysis, an improvement to Joe Zhu approach. European Journal of Operational Research 132 (2001) 553-560
27. Ramanathan R. A holistic approach to compare energy efficiencies of different transport modes. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 743-747
28. Ramanathan R. An analysis of energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions in countries of the Middle East and North Africa. Energy 30 (2005) 2831-2842
29. Ramanathan R. A multi-factor efficiency perspective to the relationships among world GDP, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 73 (2006) 483-494
30. Reichmann G., and Reichmann M.S. University library benchmarking: an international comparison using DEA. International Journal of Production Economics 100 (2006) 131-147
31. Reinhard S., Lovell K., and Thijssen G.J. Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 121 (2000) 287-303
32. Rossi F., and Thomas A.A. Analysis of the beverage data using cluster analysis rotated principal components analysis and LOESS curves. Food Quality and Preference 12 5-7 (2001) 437-445
33. SCI, 2005. Statistical Center of Iran, Management & Planning Organization, 〈http://www.sci.org.ir〉.
34. Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 108 (1998) 127-139
35. Semih O., and Soner S. Energy efficiency assessment for the Antalya region hotels in Turkey. Energy and Buildings 38 (2006) 964-971
36. Tat Y.R. Levels of satisfaction among Asian and Western travelers. International Journal of Quality Reliability Management 17 2 (2000) 116-131
37. Thanassoulis E. Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, USA
38. UN, 2001. Industrial Commodity Statistics 2001, New York.
39. Worrel E., Cuelenaere R.F.A., Blok K., and Turkenburg W.C. Energy consumption by industrial processes in the European Union. Energy 19 11 (1994) 1113-1129
40. Worrell E., Price L., Martin N., Farla J., and Schaeffer R. Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical and economic indicators. Energy Policy 25 7-9 (1997) 727-744
41. Zarnikau J. Defining total energy use in economic studies: does the aggregation approach matter?. Energy Economics 21 (1999) 458-492
42. Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L., 2006. Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics, Corrected Proof, Available online 27 June 2006, in press.
43. Zhu J. Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: an illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities Theory and Methodology. European Journal of Operational Research 111 (1998) 50-61
44. Zhu J. Super efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 129 (2001) 443-455
45. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands