Oral presentation bias: A retrospective cohort study

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 190-193

  Decullier, Evelyne ^a   Chapuis, François ^a,b  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COHORT ANALYSIS; ETHICS; MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RESEARCH WORK;

ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTINUING EDUCATION; FOLLOW UP; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; HUMANS; PUBLICATION BIAS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SPEECH;

EID: 34147210864     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2006.048603     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990;263:1385-9.
2. Decullier E, Lheritier V, Chapuis F. Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:19-22.
3. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867-72.
4. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992;267:374-8.
5. Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 1997;315:640-5.
6. Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993;50(Suppl).
7. Mahoney M. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cogn Ther Res 1977;1:161-75.
8. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, et al. Positive-outcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998;280:254-7.
9. Finucane TE, Boult CE. Association of funding and findings of pharmaceutical research at a meeting of a medical professional society. Am J Med 2004;117:842-5.
10. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
11. Décret portant statut des personnels enseignants et hospitaliers des centres hospitaliers et universitaires. Journal officiel "Lois et Décrets" 1984;705.
12. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, et al. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004;291:2457-65.
13. Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, et al. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Can Med Assoc J 2004;171:735-40.
14. Dubben HH, Beck-Bornholdt HP. Systematic review of publication bias in studies on publication bias. BMJ 2005;331:433-4.