Duplicate and fragmented publication: The policy of the Annals of Saudi Medicine

Annals of Saudi Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Cathey, John T ^a   Al Jurf, Mahmoud ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; EDITORIAL; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RELIABILITY; SAUDI ARABIA;

EID: 34147208418     PISSN: 02564947     EISSN: 13199226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Mojon-Azzi SM, Jiang X, Wagner U, Mojon DS. Redundant publications in scientific ophthalmologic journals: the tip of the iceberg? Ophthalmology. 2004;111:863-6.
2. Simultanoussubmissionstotwojournals. World Association of Medical Editors Mailing List (www.wame.org). Email string initiated 21 June 2005.
3. Anonymous. The publishing game: getting more for less. Science. 1981;211:1137-9.
4. Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter O, Robinson A. Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: A Publisher's Perspective. Institutional Journal of Clinical Practice. 2007; 61(Suppl.152),1-26.
5. Susser M, Yankauer A. Prior, Duplicate, Repetitive, Fragmented, and Redundant Publication and Editorial Decisions. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:792-3.
6. Gwilym SE, Swan MC, Giele H. One in 13 'original' articles in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery are duplicate or fragmented publications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:143-5.