Control, choice, and assessments of the value of behavioral management to nonhuman primates in captivity

Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-47

  Schapiro, Steven J ^a   Lambeth, Susan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GROOMING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MOTIVATION; NONHUMAN; PRIMATE; SOCIALIZATION;

ANIMALIA; PRIMATES;

EID: 34147207576     PISSN: 10888705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888700701277345     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Albentosa, M. J., & Cooper, J. J. (2005). Testing resource value in group-housed animals: An investigation of cage height preference in laying hens. Behavioural Processes, 70, 113-121.
2. Baker, K., Bloomsmith, M., Schoof, V., Neu, K., Maloney, M., Griffis, C., et al. (2005). Comparing pair-housing options for caged rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). American Journal of Primatology, 66(Suppl. 1), 180.
3. Bloomsmith, M. A., & Else, J. G. (2005). Behavioral management of chimpanzees in biomedical research facilities: The state of the science. ILAR Journal, 46, 192-201.
4. Butler, R. A. (1960). Acquired drives and the curiosity-investigative motives. In R. H. Waters, D. A. Rethlingshafer, & W. E. Caldwell (Eds.), Principles of comparative psychology (pp. 144-176). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Cooper, J. J. (2004). Consumer demand under commercial husbandry conditions: Practical advice on measuring behavioural priorities in captive animals. Animal Welfare, 13, S47-S56.
6. Cooper, J. J., & Appleby, M. C. (1997). Motivational aspects of individual variation in response to nest boxes by laying hens. Animal Behaviour, 54, 1245-1253.
7. Crockett, C. M., Bellanca, R. U., Bowers, C. L., & Bowden, D. M. (1997). Grooming-contact bars provide social contact for individually caged laboratory macaques. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science, 36, 53-60.
8. Dawkins, M. S. (1983). Battery hens name their price: Consumer demand theory and the measurement of ethological "needs," Animal Behaviour, 31, 1195-1205.
9. Dawkins, M. S. (2006). A user's guide to animal welfare science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 77-82.
10. Dawkins, M. S., & Beardsley (1986). Reinforcing properties of access to litter in hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 15, 351-364.
11. Harlow, H. F. (1971). Learning to love. New York: Ballantine.
12. Hau, J., & Schapiro, S. J. (2004). The welfare of non-human primates. In E. Kaliste (Ed.), The welfare of laboratory animals (pp. 291-314). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Lambeth, S. P., Hau, J., Perlman, J. E., Martino, M., & Schapiro, S. J. (2006). Positive reinforcement training affects hematologic and serum chemistry values in captive chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 68, 245-256.
14. Lambeth, S. P., Perlman, J. E., Thiele, E., & Schapiro, S. J. (2005). Changes in hematology and blood chemistry parameters in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) as a function of blood sampling technique: Trained vs. anesthetized samples. American Journal of Primatology, 66(Suppl. 1), 182.
15. Laule, G., Bloomsmith, M. A., & Schapiro, S. J. (2003). The use of positive reinforcement training techniques to enhance the care, management, and welfare of primates in the laboratory. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 6, 163-173.
16. Lutz, C., & Novak, M. A. (2005). Enviromental enrichment for nonhuman primates: Theory and application. ILAR Journal, 46, 178-191.
17. Mason, G., McFarland, D., & Gamer, J. (1998). A demanding task: Using economic techniques to assess animal priorities. Animal Behaviour, 55, 1071-1075.
18. Matthews, L. R., & Ladewig, J. (1994). Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour, 47, 713-719.
19. Mazur, J. E. (2002). Learning and behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Nelson, R. J., & Mandrell, T. D. (2005). Enrichment and nonhuman primates: First, do no harm. ILAR Journal, 46, 171-177.
21. Paronis, C. A., Gasior, M., & Bergman, J. (2002). Effects of cocaine under concurrent fixed ratio schedules of food and IV drug availability: A novel choice procedure in monkeys. Psychopharmacology, 163, 283-291.
22. Pruetz, J. D., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (1992). Comparing two manipulable objects as enrichment for captive chimpanzees. Animal Welfare, 1, 127-137.
23. Reinhardt, V. (1990, January). Comparing the effectiveness of PVC perches versus wooden perches as environmental enrichment objects for singly caged rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Primate Newsletter, 29(1), 13-14.
24. Schapiro, S. J. (2002). Effects of social manipulations and environmental enrichment on behavior and cell-mediated immune responses in rhesus macaques. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 73, 271-278.
25. Schapiro, S. J., & Bloomsmith, M. A. (1995). Behavioral effects of enrichment on singly-housed yearling rhesus monkeys: An analysis including three enrichment conditions and a control group. American Journal of Primatology, 35, 89-101.
26. Schapiro, S. J., Bloomsmith, M. A., Suarez, S. A., & Porter, L. M. (1997). A comparison of the effects of simple versus complex environmental enrichment on the behaviour of group-housed, subadult rhesus macaques. Animal Welfare, 6, 17-28.
27. Schapiro, S. J., Perlman, J. E., & Boudreau, B. A. (2001). Manipulating the affiliative interactions of group-housed rhesus macaques using positive reinforcement training techniques. American Journal of Primatology, 55, 137-149.
28. Schapiro, S. J., Perlman, J. E., Thiele, E., & Lambeth, S. (2005). Training nonhuman primates to perform behaviours useful in biomedical research. Lab Animal, 34(5), 3742.
29. Sherwin, C. M. (2004). The motivation of group-housed laboratory mice (Mus musculus), for additional space. Animal Behaviour, 67, 711-717.
30. Sherwin, C. M., & Nicol, C. J. (1996). Reorganization of behaviour in laboratory mice (Mus musculus), with varying cost of access to resources. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1087-1093.