Adaptive manifold-mapping using multiquadric interpolation applied to linear actuator design

COMPEL - The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 225-235

  Lahaye, D ^a   Canova, A ^b   Gruosso, G ^c   Repetto, M ^b  

^a CWI   (Netherlands)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Actuators; Interpolation; Optimization techniques

Indexed keywords

ACTUATORS; ALGORITHMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INTERPOLATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MACHINE DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION;

CONVERGENCE OF THE ALGORITHM; FINITE ELEMENT SIMULATION; MULTIQUADRIC INTERPOLATION; SPACE MAPPING ALGORITHMS; SURFACE MODELS;

CONFORMAL MAPPING;

EID: 34147206741     PISSN: 03321649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03321640710727593     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bandler, J.W., Cheng, Q.S., Dakroury, S.A., Mohamed, A.S., Bakr, M.H., Madsen, K. and Søndergaard, J. (2004), “Space mapping: the state of the art”, IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 337-61.
2. Box, G. and Draper, N. (1987), Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces, Wiley, New York, NY.
3. Canova, A., Gruosso, G. and Repetto, M. (2003), “Magnetic design optimization and objective function approximation”, IEEE Trans. on Magn., Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 2154-62.
4. Dorica, M. and Giannacopoulos, D. (2006), “Response surface space mapping for electromagnetic optimization”, IEEE. Trans. on Magn., Vol. 4 No. 42, pp. 1123-6.
5. Echeverría, D. and Hemker, P.W. (2005), “Space mapping and defect correction”, Comp. Methods in Appl. Math., Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 107-36.
6. Echeverría, D., Lahaye, D., Encica, L., Lomonova, E.A., Hemker, P.W. and Vandeput, A.J.A. (2006a), “Manifold mapping applied to linear actuator design”, IEEE. Trans. on Magn., Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 1183-6.
7. Echeverría, D., Lahaye, D., Encica, L., Lomonova, E.A., Hemker, P.W. and Vandeput, A.J.A. (2006b), “Manifold mapping applied to linear actuator design”, Technical Report E0606, CWI.
8. Hemker, P.W. and Echeverría, D. (2006), “A trust-region strategy for manifold mapping optimization”, Technical Report E0618, CWI.
9. Ho, S.L., Yang, S.L., Ni, G.Z. and Wong, H.C. (2005), “A response surface methodology based on improved compactly supported radial basis function and its application to rapid optimizations of electromagnetic devices”, IEEE Trans. on Magn., Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 2111-7.
10. Manella, A., Nervi, M. and Repetto, M. (1993), “Response surface method in magnetic optimization”, Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mater., Vol. 4, pp. 99-106.
11. Storn, R. and Price, K. (1997), “Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces”, Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 11, pp. 341-59.
12. Takahashi, N. (1996), “Optimization of die press model”, Proc. TEAM Workshop 6th Round, Okayama, Japan.
13. Takahashi, N., Ebihara, K., Yoshida, K., Nakata, T., Ohashi, K. and Miyata, K. (1996), “Investigation of simulated annealing method and its application to optimal design of die mold for orientation of magnetic powder”, IEEE Trans. on Magn., Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 1210-3.