Evaluation of the Efficiency of a New File Removal System in Comparison With Two Conventional Systems

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 585-588

  Terauchi, Yoshitsugu ^a   O'Leary, Le ^b   Kikuchi, Izumi ^a   Asanagi, Mami ^a   Yoshioka, Takatomo ^a,b   Kobayashi, Chihiro ^a   Suda, Hideaki ^a  

^a TOKYO MEDICAL AND DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Advanced Microendodontics PC   (United States)

Author keywords

Dentin removal rate; file removal; file removal time; masserann kit; separated nickel titanium file; ultrasonic tip

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; TIME; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

HUMANS; INCISOR; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONIC THERAPY;

EID: 34147206492     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Walia H., Brantley W.A., and Gerestein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14 (1988) 346-351
2. Cohen S., and Hargreaves K. Pathways of the pulp. ed 9. (2006), Mosby, St. Louis
3. Mandel E., Adib-Yazdi M., Benhamou L.-M., et al. Rotary NiTi profile systems for preparing curved canals in resin blocks: influence of operator on instrument breakage. Int Endod J 32 (1999) 436-443
4. Sano S., Miyake K., and Osada T. A clinical study on the removal of the broken instrument in the root canal using Masserann kit. Kanagawashigaku 9 (1974) 50-57
5. Masserann J. Removal of metallic fragments from the root canal. J Br Endod Soc 5 (1971) 55-59
6. Feldman G., Solomon C., Notaro P., and Moskowitz E. Retrieving broken endodontic instruments. J Am Dent Assoc 88 (1974) 588-591
7. Krell K.V., Fuller M.W., and Scott G.L. The conservative retrieval of silver cones in difficult cases. J Endod 10 (1984) 269-273
8. Yoldas O., Oztunc H., Tinaz C., and Alparslan N. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97 (2004) 513-517
9. Friedman S., Stabholtz A., and Tamse A. Endodontic treatment: case selection and techniques. J Endod 16 (1990) 543-549
10. Yared G. In vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used Profile nickel titanium rotary files. J Endod 30 (2004) 410-412
11. Ward J.R., Parashos P., and Messer H.H. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod 29 (2003) 756-763
12. Nagai O., Tani N., Kayaba S., and Osada T. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J 19 (1986) 298-304
13. Suter B., Lussi A., and Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int Endod J 38 (2005) 112-123
14. Terauchi Y., O'Leary L., and Suda H. Removal of separated files from root canals with a new file removal system: case reports. J Endod 32 (2006) 789-797
15. Ruddle C.J. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod 30 (2004) 827-845
16. Hulsmann M., and Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 15 (1999) 252-258