Conflicting preferences and advance directives

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 64-65

  Woien, Sandra ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMENTIA; HUMAN; LIVING WILL; NOTE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA;

ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; DEMENTIA; EUTHANASIA, ACTIVE, VOLUNTARY; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EID: 34147203918     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701221152     Document Type: Note

References (7)

1. Arneson, R. 1990. Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(2): 158-195.
2. Brandt, R. B. 1998. A theory of the good and the right. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
3. Dworkin, R. 1994. Life's dominion. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
4. Griffin, J. 1986. Well-being. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5. Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral Thinking. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
6. Harsanyi, J. C. 1977. Morality and the theory of rational behavior. Social Research 44(4): 623-656.
7. Hertogh, C. M. P. M., M. E. de Boer, R.-M. Dröes, and J. A. Eefsting, 2007. Would we rather lose our life than lose our self? Lessons from the Dutch debate on euthanasia for patients with dementia. American Journal of Bioethics 7(4): 48-56.