Numerical comparison of sensor arrays for magnetostatic linear inverse problems based on a projection method

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 356-367

  Di Rienzo, Luca ^a   Haueisen, Jens ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Magnetic fields; Sensors

Indexed keywords

BIOMAGNETISM; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETOSTATICS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEMS; PROJECTION METHOD; THREE AXIAL SENSORS;

SENSOR ARRAYS;

EID: 34147202086     PISSN: 03321649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03321640710727719     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arturi, C.M., Di Rienzo, L. and Haueisen, J. (2004), "Information content in single-component versus three-component cardiomagnetic fields", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 631-4.
2. Bellina, F., Bettini, P. and Trevisan, F. (2002), "Optimization analysis of the magnetic measurements on multistrand SC cables", IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 1651-4.
3. Bruzzone, P., Formisano, A. and Martone, R. (2002), "Optimal magnetic probes location for current reconstruction in multistrands superconducting cables", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1057-60.
4. Chadebec, O., Coulomb, J., Cauffet, G., Bongiraud, J. and Le Thiec, P. (2002), "Recent improvements for solving inverse magnetostatic problem applied to thin shells", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 1005-8.
5. Di Rienzo, L., Haueisen, J. and Arturi, C.M. (2005), "Three component magnetic field data: impact on minimum norm solutions in a biomedical application", COMPEL, The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 869-81.
6. Golub, G.H. and Van Loan, C.F. (1989), Matrix Computations, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
7. Hansen, P.C. (1998), Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-posed Problems: Numerical Aspects of Linear Inversion, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
8. Haueisen, J., Unger, R., Beuker, T. and Bellemann, M.E. (2002), "Evaluation of inverse algorithms in the analysis of magnetic flux leakage data", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 1481-8.
9. Kemppainen, P.K. and Ilmoniemi, R.J. (1989), "Channel capacity of multichannel magnetometers", in Williamson, S.J. et al. (Eds), Advances in Biomagnetism, Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp. 635-8.
10. Nalbach, M. and Dössel, O. (2002), "Comparison of sensor arrangements in MCG and ECG with respect to information content", Physica C, pp. 54-258.
11. Rouve, L., Schmerber, L., Chadebec, O. and Foggia, A. (2006), "Optimal magnetic sensor location for spherical harmonics identification applied to radiated electrical devices", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 1167-70.
12. Scorretti, R., Takahashi, R., Nicolas, L. and Burais, N. (2004), "Optimal characterization of LF magnetic field using multipoles", COMPEL, The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 1053-61.
13. Shim, Y.S. and Cho, Z.H. (1981), "SVD pseudoinversion image reconstruction", IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 29 No. 4.
14. Vogel, C.R. (2002), Computational Methods for Inverse Problems, SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.
15. Ziolkowski, M., Brauer, H. and Kuilekov, M. (2006), "Identification of dominant modes in the interface between two conducting fluids", IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 1083-6.