Public criminologies: Diverse perspectives on academia and policy

Theoretical Criminology

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 155-173

  Chancer, Lynn ^a   Mclaughlin, Eugene ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147195725     PISSN: 13624806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362480607075845     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Austin, J. (2003) ‘Why Criminology Is Irrelevant?’, Criminology and Public Policy, 2(3): 557—64.
2. Bayley, D. (2005) Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Policing Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Braithwaite, J. (2000) ‘The New Regulatory State and the Transformation of Criminology’, British Journal of Criminology, 40(1): 222—38.
4. Braithwaite, J. (2005) ‘For Public Social Science’, British Journal of Sociology, 56(3): 345—53.
5. Bumiller, K. (2007) Criminalizing Sex. Durham, NC : Duke University Press (forthcoming).
6. Burawoy, M. (2004) ‘Public Sociology: Contradictions, Dilemmas and Possibilities’, Social Forces, 82(4): 1603—18.
7. Burawoy, M. (2005a) ‘For Public Sociology’, American Sociological Review, 70(1): 4—28.
8. Burawoy, M. (2005b) ‘Return of the Repressed: Recovering the Public Face of US Sociology, One Hundred Years On’, ANNALS, AAPSS 600: 68—85.
9. Caringella, S. (2007, forthcoming) Rape Reform in Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University.
10. Carrington, K. and R. Hogg (2002) Critical Criminology: Issues, Debates and Challenges Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
11. Chan, J. (2000) ‘Globalization, Reflexivity and the Practice of Criminology’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33(2): 118—35.
12. Clarke, R.V. (2004) ‘Technology, Criminology and Crime Science’, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10(1): 55—63.
13. Cohen, S. (1996) ‘Crime and Politics: Spot the Difference’, British Journal of Sociology, 47(1): 1—21.
14. Cullen, F. (2005) ‘The Twelve People Who Saved Rehabilitation: How the Science of Criminology Made a Difference’, Criminology, 43(1): 1—42.
15. Currie, E. (1986) Confronting Crime: An American Challenge. New York: Random House.
16. Ehrenreich, B. (2001) Nickled and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. New York: Henry Holt Publishers.
17. Ericson, R. (2005) ‘Publicising Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 56(3): 365—72.
18. Gans, H. (2002) ‘More of us should become public sociologists’, Footnotes, July/August: 1—3.
19. Garland, D. and R. Sparks (2000) ‘Criminology, Social Theory and the Challenge of Our Times’, British Journal of Criminology, 40(2): 189—204.
20. Hil, R. and R. Robertson (2003) ‘What Sort of Future for Critical Criminology?’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 39(1): 91—115.
21. Hillyard, P., J. Sim, S. Tombs and D. Whyte (2004) ‘Leaving a “Stain Upon the Silence”: Contemporary Criminology and the Politics of Dissent’, British Journal of Criminology, 44(3): 369—90.
22. Jacobson, M. (2005) Downsizing Prisons: How to Reduce Crime and End Mass Incarceration. New York: New York University Press.
23. Laub, J.H. (2004) ‘The Life Course of Criminology in the United States ’, Criminology, 42(1): 1—26.
24. Loader, I. and R. Sparks (2004) ‘For an Historical Sociology of Crime Policy in England and Wales since 1968’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 7(2): 5—32.
25. Marenin, O. (2005) ‘Building a global police studies community’, Police Quarterly, 8(1): 99—136.
26. Martinson, R. (1972) ‘Paradox of Prison Reform’, The New Republic, 1 April, p. 23; 8 April, p. 13; 15 April, p. 17; 29 April, p. 21.
27. Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public Interest, 35(Spring): 22—54.
28. Murphy, C. and Stenning, P (eds) ‘Criminology research in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Special Issue, 41:2: 127—248.
29. Nelken, D. (ed.) (1996) The Future of Criminology. London: Sage.
30. O’Malley, P. (1996) ‘Criminology and the New Liberalism’, 2nd Annual Edwards Lecture, Centre for Criminology, University of Toronto, http://criminology,utoronto.ca/edwardselect
31. Reiner, R. (1988) ‘British Criminology and the State’, British Journal of Criminology, 28(2): 138—58.
32. Savelsberg, J.J. and R. Sampson (2002) ‘Mutual Engagement: Criminology and Sociology’, Crime, Law and Social Change, 37(2): 99—105.
33. Sherman, L.W. (2005) ‘The Use and Usefulness of Criminology, 1751—2005: Enlightenment Justice and Its Failures’, ANNALS, AAPSS, 600: 115—35.
34. Tittle, C. (2004) ‘The Arrogance of Public Criminology’, Social Forces, 82(4): 1639—43.
35. Walters, R. (2003) ‘New Modes of Governance and the Commodification of Knowledge’, Social and Legal Studies, 12(1): 5—26.
36. Wiles, P. (2002) ‘Criminology in the Twenty-First Century: Public Good or Private Interest?’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 35(22): 238—52.
37. Wiles, P. (2004) ‘Policy and Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 55(1): 31—4.
38. Young, J. (2003) ‘In Praise of Dangerous Thoughts: A Review Essay’, Punishment and Society, 5(1): 97—107.
39. Young, J. (2004) ‘Mayhem and Measurement in Late Modernity’, in K. Aroma and S. Nevala (eds) Crime and Crime Control in an Integrated Europe, pp. 18—31. Helsinki: HEUNI.
40. Zahn, M. (1999) ‘Thoughts on the Future of Criminology—the American Society of Criminology’, 1998 Presidential Address, Criminology, 37(1): 1—15.
41. Zimring, F. (1996) ‘Populism, Democratic Government and the Decline of Expert Authority: Some Reflections of “Three Strikes ” in California’, Pacific Law Journal, 28(1): 243—56.