The entrepreneurial university revisited: Conflicts and the importance of role separation

Social Epistemology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 41-54

  Vestergaard, Jakob ^a  

^a Institut for Ledelse Politik Og Filosofi   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Commercialisation of research; Conflicts; Role separation; Tenure; The entrepreneurial university

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147191484     PISSN: 02691728     EISSN: 14645297     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02691720601125498     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Burgelman, R. 1985. Managing the new venture division: Research findings and implications for strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 6 (1): 39-54.
2. Flyvbjerg, B. 2004. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In Qualitative research practice, edited by Scale et al. London: Sage.
3. Fuller, S. 1991. Social epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
4. _. 2000. The governance of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
5. _. 2002. Knowledge management foundations. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann.
6. _. 2005. What makes universities unique? Updating the ideal for an entrepreneurial age. Higher Education Management and Policy 17 (3): 17-42.
7. Gomm, R., M. Hammersley, and P. Foster, eds. 2000. Case study method. London: Sage.
8. Hansson, F., K. Husted, and J. Vestergaard. 2005. Second generation science parks - From structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts. Technovation 25: 1039-49.
9. INEX. nd [cited 3 January 2007]. Available from http://www.inex.org.uk/ default.asp; INTERNET.
10. INSAT. nd [cited 3 January 2007]. Available from http://www.ncl.ac.uk/ insat/; INTERNET.
11. Jackson, M. 1989. Paths towards u clearing: Radical empiricism and ethnographic inquiry. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
12. Lemola, T. 2003. Transformation of Finnish science and technology policies. Science Studies 16 (1): 52-69.
13. OECD. 2002. Benchmarking industry-science relations. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
14. _. 2003. Turning science into business. Patenting and licensing at public research organisations. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
15. Rappert, B., and A. Webster. 1997. Regimes of ordering: The commercialization of intellectual property rights in industrial-academic collaborations. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 9 (2): 115-30.
16. Romanainen, J. 1999. The cluster approach in Finnish technology policy. In Boosting innovation: The cluster approach, edited by OECD. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
17. _. 2002. Interview. Helsinki: Tekes - The National Technology Agency.
18. Senker, J. 1990. Conflict and cooperation: Industrial funding of university research. Journal of General Management 15 (3): 55-62.
19. Snowdon, K. 2003. Spin-off and entrepreneurial training model. Working paper, University of Newcastle.
20. Tuunainen, J. 2004. Hybrid practices - The dynamics of university research and emergence of a biotech company. Research Reports no. 244. Department of Sociology, University of Helsinki.
21. _. 2005. Contesting a hybrid firm at a traditional university. Social Studies of Science 35 (2): 173-210.
22. Vestergaard, J. 2003. Promoting university interaction with industry: Understanding the Finnish model Working Paper Series, no. 10. Copenhagen Business School.
23. _. 2006. The impasse of commercialization policies. A review of the current policy mix. Manuscript. Copenhagen Business School.
24. Yin, R. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.