Validity and limitations of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1)

Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-22

  Quintana, Maria Inês ^a,e   Gastal, Fábio Leite ^b   Jorge, Miguel Roberto ^a   Miranda, Cláudio Torres ^c   Andreoli, Sérgio Baxter ^a,d  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Organizacao Nacional de Acreditacao (ONA National Accreditation Organization)   (Brazil)

^c PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (United States)

^d CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF SANTOS   (Brazil)

^e NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Interview, psychological; Psychiatric status rating scales; Validity of tests

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; BIPOLAR DISORDER; BRAZIL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANIA; MENTAL DISEASE; OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER; PSYCHOSIS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOMATOFORM DISORDER; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; VALIDATION STUDY;

EID: 34147191138     PISSN: 15164446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-44462006005000024     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Wittchen HU, Lachner G, Wunderlich U, Pfister H. Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33(11):568-78.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Diagnostic Criteria for Research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993.
3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). 4th Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
4. Cottler LB, Robins LN, Grant BF, Blaine J, Towle LH, Wittchen HU, Sartorius N. The CIDI-core substance abuse and dependence questions: cross-cultural and nosological issues. The WHO/ADAMHA Field Trial. Br J Psychiatry. 1991;159:653-8.
5. Tiemens BG, VonKorff M, Lin EH. Diagnosis of depression by primary care physicians versus a structured diagnostic interview. Understanding discordance. Gen Hos Psychiatry. 1999;21(2):87-96.
6. Wittchen HU, Essau CA. Comorbidity and mixed anxiety-depressive disorders: is there epidemiologic evidence? J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54(Suppl 1):9-15.
7. Wittchen H-U, Robins LN, Cottler LB, Sartorius N, Burke JD, Regier D. Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Multicentre WHO/ADAMHA Field Trials. Br J Psychiatry. 1991;159:645-53, 658.
8. World Health Organization (WHO). The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1997.
9. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Croughan J, Ratcliff KS. National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. It's history, characteristics and validity. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(4):381-9.
10. Quintana MI, Andreoli SB, Jorge MR, Gastal FL, Miranda CT. The reliability of the Brazilian version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1). Braz J Med Biol Res. 2004;37(11):1739-45.
11. Spitzer RL. Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Compr Psychiatry. 1983;24(5):399-411.
12. Rubio-Stipec M, Bravo M, Canino G. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): an epidemiologic instrument suitable for using in conjunction with different diagnostic systems in different cultures. Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1991;37(3):191-204.
13. Mari JJ, Williams P. A comparison of the validity of two psychiatric screening questionnaire (GHQ-12 and SRQ-20) in Brazil, using Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Psychol Med. 1985;15(3):651-9.
14. World Health Organization (WHO). A user's guide to the Self Reporting Questionnaire. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1994.
15. Komiti AA, Jackson HJ, Judd FK, Cockram AM, Kyrios M, Yeatman R, Murray G, Hordern C, Wainwright K, Allen N, Singh B. A comparison of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) with clinical assessment in diagnosing mood and anxiety disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2001;35(2):224-30.
16. Janca A, Robins LN, Cottler LB, Early TS. Clinical observation of assessment using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). An analysis of the CIDI Field Trials-Wave II at the St Louis site. Br J Psychiatry. 1992;160:815-18.
17. Rosenman SJ, Korten AE, Levings CT. Computerized diagnosis in acute psychiatry: validity of CIDI-Auto against routine clinical diagnosis. J Psychiatry Res. 1997;31(5):581-92.
18. Andrews G, Peters L, Guzman AM, Bird K. A comparison of two structured diagnostic interviews: CIDI and SCAN. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1995;29(1):124-32.
19. Booth BM, Kirchner JE, Hamilton G, Harrell R, Smith GR. Diagnosing depression in the medically ill: validity of a lay-administered structured diagnostic interview. J Psychiatry Res. 1998;32(6):353-60.
20. Cooper L, Peters L, Andrews G. Validity of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) psychosis module in a psychiatric setting. J Psychiatry Res. 1998;32(6):361-8.
21. Villasenor Y, Waitzkin H. Limitations of a structured psychiatric diagnostic instrument in assessing somatization among Latino patients in primary care. Med Care. 1999;37(7):637-46.
22. Thornton C, Russell J, Hudson J. Does the Composite International Diagnostic Interview underdiagnose the eating disorders? Int J Eat Disord. 1998;23(3):341-5.
23. Peters L, Andrews G. Procedural validity of the computerized version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-Auto) in the anxiety disorders. Psychol Med. 1995;25(6):1269-80.
24. Saghir MT. A comparison of some aspects of structured and unstructured psychiatric interviews. Am J Psychiatry. 1971;128(2):180-4.
25. Anthony JC, Folstein M, Romanoski AJ, Von Korff MR, Nestadt GR, Chahal R, Merchant A, Brown CH, Shapiro S, Kramer M. Comparison of the lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule and a standardized psychiatric diagnosis. Experience in eastern Baltimore. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(7):667-75.
26. McGorry PD, Copolov DL, Singh BS. Royal Park Multidiagnostic Instrument for Psychosis: part I. Rational and review. Schizophr Bull. 1990;16(3):501-15.
27. Pulver AE, Carpenter WT, Adler L, McGrath J. Accuracy of the diagnoses of affective disorders and schizophrenia in public hospitals. Am J Psychiatry. 1988;145(2):218-20.
28. Farmer AE, Katz R, Mcguffin P, Bebbington P. A comparison between the Present State Exam and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44(12):1064-8.
29. Erdman HP, Klein MH, Greist JH, Bass SM, Bires JK, Machtinger PE. A comparison of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule and clinical diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry. 1985;144(11):1477-80.
30. Semler G, Von Cranach M, Wittchen HU. Comparison Between the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and the Present State Examination: Report to the WHO/ADAMHA Task Force on Instrument Development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1987.
31. Spengler PA, Wittchen HU. Procedural validity of standardized symptom questions for the assessment of psychotic symptoms: a comparison of the DIS with two clinical methods. Compr Psychiatry. 1988;29(3):309-22.
32. Rubinson EP, Asnis GM. Use of structure interviews for diagnosis. In: Wetzler S, editor. Measuring mental illness: psychometric assessment for clinicians. Washington, DC: Washington Psychiatric Press, Inc; 1999. p. 45-66.