Entropy and the Evaluation of Labour Market Interventions

Evaluation

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 193-219

  Walker, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

complex systems theory; entropy; evaluation; labour markets; methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147179930     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1356389007075223     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barnes, M., E. Matka and H. Sullivan (2003) ‘ Evidence, Understanding and Complexity: Evaluation in Non-Linear Systems ’, Evaluation 9(3): 265-84.
2. Bloom, H., C. Hill and J. Riccio (2003)‘ Linking Program Implementation and Effectiveness: Lessons from a Pooled Sample of Welfare-to-Work Experiments ’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(4): 551—75.
3. Cabinet Office (1999) Professional Policy Making for the Twenty-First Century. London: Cabinet Office: Strategic Policy Making Team.
4. Cabinet Office (2000) Adding it up: Improving Analysis and Modelling in Central Government. London: Cabinet Office, Performance and Innovation Unit.
5. Cabinet Office (2004a) ‘Trying It Out’: Review of the Effectiveness of Government Pilots. London: Cabinet Office.
6. Cabinet Office (2004b) The Magenta Book: Guidance Notes for Policy Evaluation and Analysis. London: Cabinet Office.
7. Calverley, J. (2004) Entropy: A Critique of DWP's Evaluation Methods. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, mimeo.
8. Celp (2005) Canadian Environmental Literacy Project, Halifax: Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia. Available at: www.celp.ca/Glossary.htm
9. Costanza, R. (ed.) (1991) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Cowell, F. (2003) Theil, Inequality and the Structure of Income Distribution. London: London School of Economics, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, Working Paper DARP 67.
11. Davies, H., S. Nutley and P. Smith (eds) (2000) Evidence and Public Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
12. Dwp (2004) The DWP Cost Benefit Framework. London: DWP; Paper to EASG, 20 Oct.
13. Faber, M., R. Manstetten and J.L.R. Proops (1996) Ecological Economics: Concepts and Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Frenken, K. (2004) ‘Entropy and Information Theory’, in H. Hanusch and A. Pyka (eds) The Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
15. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Giddens, A. (1981) ‘Agency, Institution, and Time-Space Analysis’, in K. D. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, pp. 161—74. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Greenberg, D., P. Robins and R. Walker (2005) ‘ Conducting Meta-Analyses of Evaluations of Government-Funded Training Programs ’, Review of Policy Research 22(3): 345—67.
18. Haken, H. and H. Knyazeva (2000) ‘ Arbitrariness in Nature: Synergetics and Evolutionary Laws of Prohibition’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31: 57-73.
19. Hales, J., R. Taylor, W. Mandy and M. Miller (2003) Evaluation of Employment Zones: Report on a Cohort Survey of Long-Term Unemployed People in the Zones and a Matched Set of Comparison Areas. London: Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report 176.
20. Hasluck, C., P. Elias and A. Green (2003) The Wider Labour Market Impact of Employment Zones. Warwick: Institute for Employment Research.
21. Heylighen, F. and C. Joslyn (2001a) ‘Entropy and Information’, in F. Heylighen, C. Joslyn and V. Turchin (eds) Principia Cybernetica Web (Principia Cybernetica, Brussels). Available at: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ENTRINFO.html
22. Heylighen, F. and C. Joslyn (2001b) ‘Constraints’, in F. Heylighen, C. Joslyn and V. Turchin (eds) Principia Cybernetica Web (Principia Cybernetica, Brussels). Available at: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/CONSTRAI.html
23. Hirst, A., R. Tarling, M. Lefaucheux, B. Rowland, A. McGregor, A. Glass, T. Tu, C. Simm, H. Shaw and R. Engineer (2002) Employment Zones: A Study of Local Delivery Agent and Case Studies. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, Report WAE124.
24. Jaynes, E.T. (1991) How Should we Use Entropy in Economics? Cambridge: St John's College, mimeo.
25. Joyce, L. and N. Pettigrew (2002) Personal Advisers in New Deal 25+ and Employment Zones. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, WAE139.
26. Kay, J.J., A.H. Regier, M. Boyle and G. Francis (1999) ‘ An Ecosystem Approach for Sustainability: Addressing the Challenge for Complexity ’, Futures 31: 721-42.
27. Klijn, E.-H. (1997) ‘Policy Networks: An Overview’, in W. J. M. Kichert, E.-H. Klijn and J. F. M. Koppenjan (eds) Managing Complex Networks, pp. 14-34. London: SAGE.
28. Koestler, A. (1969) ‘Beyond Atomism and Holism: The Concept of the Holon’, in A. Koestler and J. R. Smythies (eds) Beyond Reductionism. London: Hutchinson.
29. Kushner, S. (2000) Personalizing Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30. Leydesdorff, L. (2002)‘ The Communication Turn in the Theory of Social Systems’, Systems Research and Behavioural Science 19(2): 129—36.
31. Luhmann, N. (1975) ‘Systemtheorie, Evolutionstheorie und Kommunikationstheorie ’, in Soziologische Aufklärung, vol. 2, pp. 193 — 203. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Reprinted in The Differentiation of Society, tr. S. Holmes and C. Larmore, pp. 255—70. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982.
32. Martinez-Alier, J. (1987) Ecological Economics: Energy, Environment, and Society. Oxford: Blackwell's Book Services.
33. Mindell, D., J. Segal and S. Gerovitch (2003) ‘Cybernetics and Information Theory in the United States, France and the Soviet Union’, in M. Walker (ed.) Science and Ideology: A Comparative History, pp. 66—95. London: Routledge.
34. Nicolis, G. and I. Prigogine (1977) Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Pawson, R. (2002a) ‘ Evidenced-Based Policy: In Search of a Method ’, Evaluation 8(2): 157—81.
36. Pawson, R. (2002b) ‘ Evidence-Based Policy: The Promise of “Realist Synthesis ”’, Evaluation 8(3): 340-58.
37. Pawson, R. and N. Tilley (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE.
38. Pingle, M. and L. Tesfatsion (1998) ‘ Active Intermediation in a Monetary Overlapping Generations Economy ’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22: 1543-74.
39. Pitcher, J. (2002)‘ Policies and Programmes to Address Disadvantage among Young People: Issues for Evaluation ’, Evaluation 8(4): 474—95.
40. Prigogine, I. and I. Stengers (1984) Order out of Chaos. London: Heinemann.
41. Ramos-Martin, J. (2003) ‘ Empiricism in Ecological Economics: A Perspective from Complex Systems Theory’, Ecological Economics 46(3): 387—98.
42. Shannon, C.E. (1948) ‘ A Mathematical Theory of Communication ’, The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 323-32, 379 - 423.
43. Sheppard, B. (2005a) Developing a Multiple Disadvantage Evaluation Framework for DWP Client Groups: Converting Research into Practice. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, mimeo.
44. Sheppard, B. (2005b) Comparison of Evaluation Frameworks: A Case Study of Employment Zones. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, mimeo.
45. Sheppard, B. and D. Jenkins (2004) The ‘Entropy Sector’: Encouraging Debate on Measuring Employment Programme Impact on Disadvantage. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, mimeo, and pp. 166 —167. Available at: http://www.regional-studies-assoc.ac.uk/events/aalborg05/gateway_7.pdf
46. Templet, P.H. (2004) ‘ Diversity and Other Emergent Properties of Industrial Economies’, Progress in Industrial Ecology 1(1-3): 24-38.
47. Tesfatsion, L. (2005) ‘Agent-Based Computational Economics: A Constructive Approach to Economic Theory’, in K. L. Judd and L. Tesfatsion (eds) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, Agent-Based Computational Economics. Amsterdam: Handbooks in Economics Series, North-Holland.
48. Theil, H. (1967) Economic and Information Theory. Amsterdam: North Holland.
49. Ulanowicz, R.E. (1986) Growth and Development: Ecosystem Phenomenology. New York: Springer.
50. Voyer, J.-P., K. Johnson, C. Montmarquette and C. Eckel (2002) Fostering Adult Education: A Laboratory Experiment on the Efficient Use of Loans, Grants and Savings Incentives. Ottawa: Social Research Demonstration Corporation.
51. Walker, R. (2001) ‘ Great Expectations: Can Social Science Evaluate New Labour's Policies? ’, Evaluation 7(3): 305—30.
52. Walker, R. (2004) ‘Evaluation: Evidence for Public Policy’, in Evaluating Policies for Local Economic and Employment Development, pp. 63—111. Paris: OECD.
53. Walker, R. (2005) Entropy, Employment and Evaluation: An Investigation of the ‘E’ Metaphor. Sheffield: Department for Work and Pensions, Paper.
54. Walker, R., L. Hoggart and G. Hamilton with S. Blank (2006) Making Random Assignment Happen: Evidence from the UK Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) demonstration. London: Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report No. 330.
55. Walras, L. (1874) Éléments d'Économie Politique Pure. Lausanne: Rouge.