Surrogate model-based optimization framework: A case study in aerospace design

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 51, Issue , 2007, Pages 323-342

  Mack, Yolanda ^a   Goel, Tushar ^a   Shyy, Wei ^b   Haftka, Raphael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147157957     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-49774-5_14     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Balabanov VO, Giunta AA, Golovidov O, Grossman B, Mason W, Watson LT, Haftka RT (1999), Reasonable design space approach to response surface approximation. J Aircraft 36:1:308-315
2. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratap A, Meyarivan T (2000) A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II. In: Nature VI Conference, Paris, pp 849-858
3. Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Haftka RT, Queipo NV, Shyy W, Tucker PK (2004) Response surface approximation of Pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization. In: 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany NY, Paper No. 2004-4501
4. He B, Ghattas O, Antaki JF (1997) Computational Strategies for Shape Optimization of Time-Dependent Navier-Stokes Flows. Technical Report CMUCML-97-102, Computational Mechanics Lab, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University
5. Huber, F (2001) Turbine aerodynamic design tool development. In: Space Transportation Fluids Workshop, Marshall Space Flight Center, AL
6. Kim S, Leoviriyakit K, Jameson A (2003) Aerodynamic Shape and Planform Optimization of Wings Using a Viscous Reduced Adjoint Gradient Formula. Second M.I.T. Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics at M.I.T, Cambridge, MA
7. Kontoravdi C, Asprey SP, Pistikopoulos EN. Mantalaris A (2005). Application of Global Sensitivity Analysis to Determine Goals for Design of Experiments - An Example Study on Antibody-producing Cell Cultures, Biotechnol Progr (in press).
8. Madsen JI, Shyy W, Haftka RT (2000) Response surface techniques for diffuser shape optimization. AIAA J 38:1512-1518
9. Myers RH and Montgomery DC (2002) Response Surface Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
10. Nadarajah S, Jameson A, and Alonso JJ. (2002) Sonic boom reduction using an adjoint method for wing-body configurations in supersonic flow., 9th. AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Atlanta, GA, AIAA paper 2002-5547
11. Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin L, Huber F, Tran K. (2000) Preliminary design optimization for a supersonic turbine for rocket propulsion. In: AIAA/ SAE/ASME/ASEE 35th Joint Propulsion Conference, Paper No. 2000-3242
12. Papila N, Shyy W, Griffin L, Dorney DJ (2002) Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using global approximation methods. J Propulsion and Power 18:509-518
13. Queipo N, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R (2005) Surrogate-Based Analysis and Optimization. Accepted for publication in Prog in Aero Sci
14. Rodriguez DL (2002) A Multidisciplinary Optimization Method for Designing Boundary Layer Ingesting Inlets. 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, Georgia, AIAA paper 2002-5665
15. Roux WJ, Stander N, Haftka RT (1998) Response surface approximations for structural optimization. Int J for Numer Methods in Eng 42: 517-534
16. Sobol IM (1993) Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment 1:4:407-414
17. Vaidyanathan R, Papila N, Shyy W, Tucker KP, Griffin LW, Haftka RT, Fitz-Coy N (2000) Neural network and response surface methodology for rocket engine component optimization. In: 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Long Beach, CA, Paper No. 2000-4480