Citizen groups and scientific decisionmaking: Does public participation influence environmental outcomes?

Journal of Policy Analysis and Management

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 349-368

  Daley, Dorothy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147154044     PISSN: 02768739     EISSN: 15206688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pam.20251     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Achen, C. H. (1986). The statistical analysis of quasi-experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Applegate, J. S. (1998). Beyond the usual suspects: The use of citizens advisory boards in environmental decision-making. Indiana Law Journal, 73(3), 1-43.
3. Balla, S. J., Lawrence, E. D., Maltzman, F., & Sigelman, L. (2002). Partisanship, blame avoidance, and the distribution of legislative pork. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 515-525.
4. Barnett, H. C. (1994). Toxic debts and the superfund dilemma. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
5. Baumgartner, F. R., & Leech, B. L. (1998). Basic interests: The importance of groups in politics and in political science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Bawn, K. (1995). Political control versus expertise - congressional choices about administrative procedures. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 62-73.
7. Beierle, T. C. (1998). Public participation in environmental decisions: An evaluation frame-work using social goals. Retrieved September 2005 from http://www.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-99-06.pdf.
8. Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
9. Bowman, A. O. (1988). Five years and how many cleanups? In C. E. Davis & J. P. Lester (Eds.), Dimensions of hazardous waste politics and policy. New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
10. Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11. Chess, C., & Purcell, K. (1999). Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science & Technology, 33(16), 2685-2692.
12. Daley, D. M., & Layton, D. F. (2004). Policy implementation and the environmental Protection Agency: What factors influence remediation at Superfund sites? The Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 375-392.
13. Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
14. Environmental Protection Agency. (1992). Hazard ranking system guidance manual (No. EPA-540-R-92-026). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15. Environmental Protection Agency. (1998). A review of community advisory groups in Region 5: Lessons learned. Chicago: U.S. Government Printing Office.
16. Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). Evaluation report on the Pine Street Barge Canal Coordinating Council, Burlington, VT: Lessons learned from this Region 1 community advisory group. Boston: U.S. Government Printing Office.
17. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001a). Stakeholder Involvement & Public Participation at the U.S. EPA: Lessons Learned, Barriers, & Innovative Approaches (No. EPA-100-R-00-040). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18. Environmental Protection Agency. (2001b). Treatment technologies for site cleanup: Annual status report (Tenth Edition). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (No. EPA-542-R-01-004). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19. Environmental Protection Agency. (2002). Superfund community involvement handbook (No. EPA 540-K - 01-003). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1994). Administrative procedures, information, and agency discretion. American Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 697-722.
21. Epstein, D., & O'Halloran, S. (1995). A theory of strategic oversight - Congress, lobbyists, and the bureaucracy. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 11(2), 227-255.
22. Folk, E. (1991). Public participation in the Superfund cleanup process. Ecology Law Quarterly, 18(1), 173-221.
23. Gamson, W. A. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26(3), 373-382.
24. Gray, V., & Lowery, D. (1996). The population ecology of interest representation: Lobbying communities in the American states. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
25. Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Gupta, S., Vanhoutven, G., & Cropper, M. (1995). Do benefits and costs matter in environmental regulation? An analysis of EPA decisions under Superfund. In R. L. Revesz & R. B. Stewart (Eds.), Analyzing Superfund: Economic, science, and law. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
27. Hall, H. I., Price-Green, P. A., Dhara, V. R., & Kaye, W. E. (1995). Health effects related to releases of hazardous substances on the Superfund priority list. Chemosphere, 31(1), 2455-2461.
28. Hamilton, J. T. (1993). Politics and social costs: Estimating the impact of collective action on hazardous waste facilities. The Rand Journal of Economics, 24(1), 101-125.
29. Hamilton, J. T., & Viscusi, W. K. (1999). Calculating risk? The spatial and political dimensions of hazardous waste policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Helco, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment. In A. King (Ed.), The new American political system. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
31. Hird, J. A. (1994). Superfund: The political economy of risk. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
32. Huber, J. D., Shipan, C. R., & Pfahler, M. (2001). Legislatures and statutory control of bureaucracy. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 330-345.
33. Johnson, B. L. (1995). Nature, extent, and impact of Superfund hazardous waste sites. Chemosphere, 31(1), 2415-2428.
34. Johnson, B. L., & DeRosa, C. T. (1997). The toxicological hazard of Superfund hazardous waste sites. Reviews on Environmental Health, 12(4), 235-251.
35. Ketkar, K. (1992). Hazardous waste sites and property values in the State of New Jersey. Applied Economics, 24(6), 647-659.
36. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583-600.
37. Kohlhase, J. E. (1991). The impact of toxic waste sites on housing values. Journal of Urban Economics, 30(1), 1-26.
38. Lowry, R. C. (1998). All hazardous waste politics is local: Grass-roots advocacy and public participation in siting and cleanup decisions. Policy Studies Journal, 26(4), 748-759.
39. Lubell, M. (2003). Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 309-323.
40. Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 549-573.
41. McCubbins, M. D. (1985). The legislative design of regulatory structure. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 721-748.
42. McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. G., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law Economics & Organizations, 3, 243-277.
43. Moe, T. M. (1981). Toward a broader view of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 43(2), 531-543.
44. Oliver, P. (1984). "If you don't do it, nobody else will": Active and token contributions to local collective action. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 601-610.
45. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005a). Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms' regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 235-248.
47. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2005b). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities' environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 745-769.
48. Rahm, D. (1998). Controversial cleanup: Superfund and implementation of U.S. hazardous waste policy. Policy Studies Journal, 26(4), 719-734.
49. Ringquist, E. J. (2005). Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 223-247.
50. Ringquist, E. J., Worsham, J., & Eisner, M. A. (2003). Salience, complexity, and the legislative direction of regulatory bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 13(2), 141-164.
51. Sabatier, P. A., Loomis, J., & McCarthy, C. (1995). Hierarchical controls, professional norms, local constituencies, and budget maximization: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service planning decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 204-242.
52. Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An exchange theory of interest groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1-32.
53. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143-158.
54. Sigman, H. (1998). Liability funding and Superfund clean-up remedies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35(3), 205-224.
55. Sigman, H. (2001). The pace of progress at Superfund sites: Policy goals and interest group influence. Journal of Law & Economics, 44(1), 315-344.
56. Teske, N. (2000). A tale of two TAGs: Dialogue and democracy in the Superfund Program. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(4), 664-678.
57. Torra, V., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Mateo-Sanz, J. M., & Ng, M. (2006). Regression for ordinal variables without underlying continuous variables. Information Sciences, 176(4), 465-474.
58. Walker, J. L. (1983). The origins and maintenance of interest groups in America. The American Political Science Review, 77(2), 390-406.
59. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
60. Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85, 801-828.
61. Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1993). The dynamics of political-bureaucratic adaptation. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 497-528.
62. Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1994). The bureaucratic dynamics: The role of a bureaucracy in a democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.