Multi Criteria Analysis in natural hazard management

Natural Hazards and Earth System Science

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 293-302

  Gamper, C D ^a,b   Thoni M ^a,b   Weck Hannemann, H ^a,b  

^a alpS Zentrum fur Naturgefahren Management   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147132538     PISSN: 15618633     EISSN: 16849981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-6-293-2006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ammann, W.: Integrales Risikomanagement - der gemeinsame Weg in die Zukunft, Bündnerwald, 5, 14-17, 2001.
2. Belton, V. and Stewart, T. J.: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
3. Belton, V. and Vickers, S.: Use of simple Multi-Attribute Value Function incorporating visual interactive sensitivity analysis for Multiple Criteria Decision Making, in: Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, edited by: Bana e Costa, C. A., Berlin, Springer, 320-334, 1990.
4. Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., and Weimer, D. L.: Cost-Benefit Analysis - Concepts and Practice, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2001.
5. Bosch, H. and Kahn, M.: Approaches and Methods to Prioritization of Adaption Activities, LEG Regional Workshop, Samoa, 2003.
6. Brouwer, R. and Van Ek, R.: Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands, Ecological Economics, 50, 1-21, 2004.
7. Brown, K., Adger, W.N., Tompkins, E., Bacon, P., Shim, D. and Young, K.: Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecological Economics, 37, 417-434, 2001.
8. Bründl, M., Mc Alpin, M. C., Gruber, U., and Fuchs, S.: Cost- Benefit Analysis of Measures for Avalanche Risk Reduction - a Case Study from Davos, Switzerland, forthcoming in: Risk 21 - Coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21 Century, Conference Proceedings, Davos, 2005.
9. Cavallaro, F. and Ciraolo, L.: A Multicriteria Approach to evaluate Wind Energy Pants on an Italian Island, Energy Policy, 33, 235- 244, 2005.
10. Connolly, S. and Munro, A.: Economics of The Public Sector, Prentice Hall, 1999.
11. De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Casciao, S., and Munda, G.: Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation, An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily, Ecological Economics, 34, 267-282, 2000.
12. Degenhardt, S., Hampicke, U., Holm-Müller, K., Jaedicke, W., and Pfeiffer, C.: Zahlungsbereitschaft für Naturschutzprogramme, Angewandte Landschaftsökologie, 25, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, 1998.
13. Dogson, J., Spackmann, M., Pearman, A., and Philips, L.: Multi- Criteria Analysis: A Manual, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Creating sustainable communities, 2001.
14. Edwards-Jones, G., Davies, B., and Hussain, S.: Ecological Economics, An Introduction, Blackwell Science, London, 2000.
15. Elsasser, P.: Der Erholungswert des Waldes, Monetäre Bewertung der Erholungsleistung ausgewählterWälder in Deutschland, Schriften zur Forstökonomie, 11, 218-225, 1996.
16. Fandel, G. and Spronk, J.: Multiple Criteria-Decision Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin, 1983.
17. Fuchs, S. and McAlpin, M. C.: The Net Benefit of Public Expenditures on Avalanche Defence Structures in the Municipality of Davos, Switzerland, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 319-330, 2005.
18. Gamper, C. D.: Building Energy Scenarios for Eastern Styria (Austria) using Multi Criteria Mapping with the Inclusion of Participatory Methods, Master of Science Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2004.
19. Garrod, G. and Kenneth, G. W.: Economic Valuation of the Environment: Methods and Case Studies, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1999.
20. Graham, J. E. and Hall, W. W.: Hurricanes, Housing Market Activity, and Coastal Real Estate Values, The Appraisal Journal, 379-387, October 2001.
21. Hackl, F. and Pruckner, G. J.: Die Kosten/Nutzen Analyse als Bewertungsinstrument der Umweltpolitik, in: Einführung in die Umweltpolitik, edited by: Bartel, R., Hackl, F., Vahlen, München, 83-100, 1994.
22. Hanley, N. and Spash, C. J.: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 1993.
23. International Society on MCDM.: International Society on Multi- Criteria Decision Making, http://www.terry.uga.edu/mcdm/ (last access 17.6.2004), 2004.
24. Joubert, A. R., Leiman, A., Klerk, H. M., Katua, S., and Aggenbach, J. C.: Fynbos (fine bush) vegetation and the supply of water: a comparison of multi-criteria decision analysis and costbenefit analysis, Ecological Economics, 22, 123-140, 1997.
25. Kämmerer, S., Schmitz, P. M., and Wiegand, S.: Monetäre Bewertung der Kulturlandschaft in Baden-Württemberg, in: Nachhaltige Land- und Forstwirtschaft. Expertisen., edited by: Linckh, G., Sprich, H., Flaig, H., and Mohr, H., Springer, Berlin, 77-97, 1996.
26. Kienholz, H., Krummenacher, B., Kipfer, A., and Perret, S.: Aspects of integral risk management in practice - considerations with respect to mountain hazards in Switzerland, Ö sterreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 56, 43-50, 2004.
27. Löwenstein, W.: Reisekostenmethode und bedingte Bewertungsmethode, Schriften zur Forstökonomie, Band 6, 206pp., 1994.
28. Mueller, D.: Public Choice III, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
29. Munda, G.: Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment, Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics, Physica, Heidelberg, 1995.
30. Navrud, S. and Pruckner, G. J.: Environmental Valuation - To use or not to use? A comparative study of the USA and Europe, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, 1-25, 1997.
31. Omann, I.: Multi-Criteria Decision Aid as an Approach for Sustainable Development Analysis and Implementation, PhD Thesis, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, 2004.
32. Pruckner, G.J.: Die ökonomische Quantifizierung natürlicher Ressourcen. Eine Bewertung überbetrieblicher Leistungen der österreichischen Land- und Forstwirtschaft, PhD Thesis Johannes-Keppler University, Linz, 1993.
33. Pruckner, G. J.: Contingent Valuation - The public debate and environmental applications, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 4, 1995.
34. Römer, A. U.: Der kontingente Bewertungsansatz. Eine geeignete Methode zur Bewertung umweltverbessernder Maßnahmen?, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 14, 411-456, 1991.
35. Rosen, S.: Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, The Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1, 34-55, 1974.
36. Steininger, K.W. andWeck-Hannemann, H.: Global Environmental Change in Alpine Regions: Recognition, Impact, Adaptation and Mitigation, New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2002.
37. Stirling, A. and Mayer, S.: A Precautionary Approach to Technology Appraisal? - A multi-criteria mapping of genetic modification in UK agriculture, TA-Datenbank-Nachrichten, 3/9, 39-51, 2000.
38. Thöni, M.: Was sind Schutzmaßnahmen wert?, Journal of Torrent, Avalanches, Landslide and Rock Fall Engineering, 153, 67-75, 2005.
39. Van Pelt, M. J. F.: Environment and project appraisal: lessons from two cases, The Annals of Regional Science, 28, 55-76, 1994.
40. Vincke, P., Gassner, M., and Roy, B.: Multicriteria Decision-Aid, Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, 1989.
41. WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development.: Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983. Weck-Hannemann, H.: Was ist der Wald uns wert? Eine Einsch ätzung aus ökonomischer Sicht, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 2, 95-110, 1994.
42. Weck-Hannemann, H.: Was ist der Wald uns wert? Eine Einsch ätzung aus ökonomischer Sicht, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 2, 95-110, 1994.
43. Wilhelm, C.: Wirtschaftlichkeit im Lawinenschutz, Swiss Federal Institute of Snow and Avalanche Research, Davos, 1997.
44. Wilhelm, C.: Risikoanalyse bei gravitativen Naturgefahren. Fallbeispiele und Daten, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, BUWAL, 107/II, Bern, 1999.