Referential problems and turn construction: An exploration of an intersection between grammar and interaction

Text

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 437-468

  Makoto, Hayashi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Grammar; Interactional linguistics; Japanese; Referential problem; Turn construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147124503     PISSN: 01654888     EISSN: 18607349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/text.2005.25.4.437     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Auer, J. C. P. (1984). Referential problems in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 8:627-648
2. Clark, H. H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition 22: 1-39
3. Downing, P. A. (1996). Proper names as a referential option in English conversation. In Studies in Anaphora, B. Fox (ed.), 95-143. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
4. Ford, C. E. and Fox, B. A. (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In Studies in Anaphora, B. Fox (ed.), 145-168. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
5. Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., and Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Interaction and Grammar, E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
6. Geluykens, R. (1992). From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left-Dislocation in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
7. Hayashi, M. (1999). Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22: 475-499
8. -(2003a). Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins
9. -(2003b). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36: 109- 141
10. -(2004a). Discourse within a sentence: An exploration of postpositions in Japanese as an interactional resource. Language in Society 33: 343-376
11. -(2004b). Projection and grammar: Notes on the 'action-projecting' use of the distal demonstrative are in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1337-1374
12. Hayashi, M. and Yoon, K. (2004). A cross-linguistic exploration of interactional uses of demonstratives: With particular reference to the context of 'word-formulating trouble' in conversation. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
13. Jefferson, G. (1973). A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9: 47-96
14. -(2004). A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, G. Lemer (ed.), 43-59. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins
15. Kitano, H. (1999). On interaction and grammar: Evidence from one use of the Japanese demonstrative are ('that'). Pragmatics 9: 383-400
16. Lerner, G. H. (1996). On the 'semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Interaction and Grammar, E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 238-276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
17. Lerner, G. H. and Takagi, T. (1999). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 49-75
18. Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B. (1983). Foregrounding references: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. In Acquiring Conversational Competence, E. Ochs and B. Scheif-felin (eds.), 158-174. London: Routledge
19. Ono, T. and Suzuki, R. (1992). Word order variability in Japanese conversation: Motivations and grammaticization. Text 12: 429-445
20. Ono, T., Yoshida, E., and Banno, M. (1998). It takes two to dance: The interactional determinants of NP intonation units with a marked rising intonation (hangimonkei) in Japanese conversation. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 7, N. Akatsuka, H. Hoji, S. Iwasaki, and S. Strauss (eds.), 95-103. Stanford: CSLI Publications
21. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1 and 2, G. Jefferson (ed.). Oxford: Blackwell
22. Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, G. Psathas (ed.), 15-21. New York: Irvington Publishers
23. Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, D. Sudnow (ed.), 75-119. New York: The Free Press
24. -(1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, T. Givón (ed.), 261-286. New York: Academic Press
25. -(1987). Recycled turn beginnings: A precise mechanism in conversation's tum-taking organization. In Talk and Social Organisation, G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (eds.), 70-85.Clevedon: Multilingual Matters
26. -(1996a). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Studies in Anaphora, B. Fox (ed.), 437-485. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
27. -(1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 52-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
28. -(2000). Interruption, overlap and turn-taking: Accounts of conduct in interaction. Language in Society 29: 1-63
29. Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., and Thompson, S. A. (1996). Introduction. In Interaction and Grammar, E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson (eds.), 1-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. Tanaka, H. (1999). Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins
31. -(2000). Turn-projection in Japanese talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33: 1-38
32. -(2001). Adverbials for turn-projection in Japanese: Towards a demystification of the 'telepathic' mode of communication. Language in Society 30: 559-587