A cosmetovigilance survey in Europe

Pharmacological Research

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 455-460

  Sautebin, Lidia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adverse cosmetic reactions; Cosmetic safety; Cosmetovigilance; European Union; Notification system; Reporting form

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ARTICLE; CONSUMER; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNSPECIFIED SIDE EFFECT;

ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING SYSTEMS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; COSMETICS; EUROPE; FORMS AND RECORDS CONTROL; GUIDELINES; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SKIN DISEASES;

EID: 34147113478     PISSN: 10436618     EISSN: 10961186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lindquist M. Data quality management in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 27 (2004) 857-870
2. http://www.fda.gov/.
3. http://agmed.sante.gouv.fr/.
4. EU Cosmetics directive 76/768/EEC art.1.
5. http://www.colipa.com/.
6. Tomar J., Jain V.K., Aggarwal K., Dayal S., and Gupta S. Contact allergies to cosmetics: testing with 52 cosmetic ingredients and personal products. J Dermatol 32 (2005) 51-55
7. Berne B., Bostrom A., Grahnen A.F., and Tammela M. Adverse effects of cosmetics and toiletries reported to the Swedish Medical Products Agency 1989-1994. Contact Dermatitis 34 (1996) 359-362
8. Di Giovanni C., Arcoraci V., Gambardella L., and Sautebin L. Cosmetovigilance survey: are cosmetics considered safe by consumers?. Pharmacol Res 53 (2006) 16-21
9. Lindberg M., Tammela M., Bostrom A., Fischer T., Inerot A., and Sundberg K. Are adverse skin reactions to cosmetics underestimated in the clinical assessment of contact dermatitis? A prospective study among 1075 patients attending Swedish patch test clinics. Acta Derm Venereol 84 (2004) 291-329
10. Meloni M., and Berardesca E. The impact of COLIPA guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility on the cosmetic products. Am J Clin Dermatol 2 (2001) 65-68
11. De Groot A.C., Beverdam E.G., Ayong C.T., Coenraads P.J., and Nater J.P. The role of contact allergy in the spectrum of adverse effects caused by cosmetics and toiletries. Contact Dermatitis 19 (1988) 195-201
12. Mehta S.S., and Reddy B.S. Cosmetic dermatitis-current perspectives. Int J Dermatol 42 (2003) 533-542
13. Blondeel A. Intolerance reactions to cosmetics. J Pharm Belg 48 (1993) 308-312
14. Fisher A.A. Status cosmeticus: a cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Cutis 46 (1990) 109-110
15. Lowe N.J. Cutaneous phototoxicity reactions. Br J Dermatol 115 (1986) 86-92
16. Scheman A. Adverse reactions to cosmetics ingredients. Dermatol Clin 18 (2000) 685-698
17. Torkil M., and Wahlber J.E. Risk assessment failures of chemicals commonly used in consumer products. Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 189-190
18. Balzer C., Geier J., Frosch P.J., and Schnuch A. Patch testing with patients' own cosmetics and toiletries-results of the IVDK*, 1998-2002. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005) 226-233
19. Johansen J.D., Rastogi S.C., and Menne T. Contact allergy to popular perfumes: assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis. Br J Dermatol 135 (1996) 419-422
20. Johansen J.D. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review. Am J Clin Dermatol 4 (2003) 789-798
21. Gago-Dominguez M., Castelao J.E., Yuan J.M., Yu M.C., and Ross R.K. Use of permanent hair dyes and bladder cancer risk. Int J Cancer 91 (2001) 575-579
22. Sosted H., Agner T., Andersen K.E., and Menné T. 55 cases of allergic reactions to hair dye: a descriptive, consumer complaint-based study. Contact Dermatitis 47 (2002) 299-303
23. Darbre P.D. Underarm cosmetics and breast cancer. J Appl Toxicol 23 (2003) 89-95
24. Darbre P.D., Aljarrah A., Miller W.R., Coldham N.G., Sauer M.J., and Pope G.S. Concentrations of parabens in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol 24 (2004) 5-13
25. Farm G. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 201 (1998) 1-42
26. Hausen B.M. Contact allergy to balsam of Peru. II. Patch test results in 102 patients with selected balsam of Peru constituents. Am J Contact Dermat 12 (2001) 93-102
27. Schnuch A., Lessmann H., Geier J., Frosch P.J., and Uter W. IVDK. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 65-76
28. Sosted H., Rastogi S.C., Andersen K.E., Johansen J.D., and Menne T. Hair dye contact allergy: quantitative exposure assessment of selected products and clinical cases. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2004) 44-348
29. Shapiro M., Mowad C., and James W.D. Contact dermatitis due to printer's ink in a milk industry employee: case report and review of the allergen paraphenylenediamine. Pediatr Dermatol 19 (2002) 498-502
30. Wilkinson J.D., Shaw S., Andersen K.E., Brandao F.M., Bruynzeel D.P., Bruze M., et al. Wilkinson Monitoring levels of preservatives sensitivity in Europe. Contact Dermatitis 46 (2002) 207-211
31. Orton D.I., and Wilkinson J.D. Cosmetic allergy: incidence, diagnosis, and management. Am J Clin Dermatol 5 (2004) 327-337
32. www.european-cosmetics.info.
33. Tissier M.H., and Lepagnol F. Cosmetovigilance: a French pharmacovigilance system for cosmetics developed by the French health products safety agency, a proposal for the future. Therapie 57 (2002) 273-282
34. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., and Gefeller O. Epidemiology of contact allergy: an estimation of morbidity employing the clinical epidemiology and drug-utilization research (CE-DUR) approach. Contact Dermatitis 47 (2002) 32-39
35. http://www.coe.int/.