Effects of aneuploidy on skull growth in a mouse model of Down syndrome

Journal of Anatomy

Volumn 210, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 394-405

  Hill, Cheryl A ^a   Reeves, Roger H ^b   Richtsmeier, Joan T ^a,c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

3D microcomputed tomography; Aneuploidy; Craniofacial morphology; Down syndrome; Growth; Landmark analysis; Mouse; Trisomy 21

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; CRANIOFACIAL MALFORMATION; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DISEASE MODEL; DOWN SYNDROME; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; MOUSE; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL DEVELOPMENT; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRISOMY 21;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMALS; DOWN SYNDROME; FEMALE; FETAL DEVELOPMENT; GESTATIONAL AGE; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MICE; MICE, MUTANT STRAINS; MODELS, ANIMAL; PALATE; SKULL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

MUS;

EID: 34147113358     PISSN: 00218782     EISSN: 14697580     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00705.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Aldridge K, Reeves R, Baxter LL, Olson LE, Richtsmeier JT (2006) Differential effects of trisomy on brain shape and Volume in related aneuploid mouse models. Am J Med Genet, Part A 9999, 1-11.
2. Allanson J, O'Hara P, Farkas L, Nair R (1993) Anthropometric craniofacial pattern profiles in Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47, 748-752.
3. Antonarakis SE, Lyle R, Dermitzakis ET, Reymond A, Deutsch S (2004) Chromosome 21 and down syndrome: From genomics to pathophysiology. Nat Rev Genet 5, 725-738.
4. Atchley W, Hall B (1991) A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biol Rev 66, 101-157.
5. Bagic I, Verzak Z (2003) Craniofacial anthropometric analysis in Down syndrome patients. Coll Antropol 27 (Suppl. 2), 23-30.
6. Baxter L, Abrams M, Richtsmeier J, Reiss A, Reeves R (1998) Ts65Dn segmentally trisomic mice exhibit morphological changes in cerebellum similar to those in Down Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 63, A159.
7. Baxter LL, Moran TH, Richtsmeier JT, Troncoso J, Reeves RH (2000) Discovery and genetic localization of Down syndrome cerebellar phenotypes using the Ts65Dn mouse. Hum Mol Genet 9, 195-202.
8. Carroll S (2001) From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Oxford: Blackwell.
9. Carroll SB (2005) Evolution at two levels: On genes and form. PLoS Biol 3, e245.
10. Cooper JD, Salehi A, Delcroix JD, et al. (2001) Failed retrograde transport of NGF in a mouse model of Down syndrome: Reversal of cholinergic neurodegenerative phenotypes following NGF infusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 10439-10444.
11. Cronk C, Reed R (1981) Canalization of growth in Down syndrome children three months to six years. Human Biol 53, 383-398.
12. Davisson M, Schmidt C, Reeves N, et al. (1993) Segmental trisomy as a mouse model for Down Syndrome. Prog Clin Biol Res 384, 117-133.
13. Depew MJ, Tucker AS, Sharpe PT (2002) Craniofacial development. In Mouse Development: Patterning, Morphogensis, and Organogenesis (eds Rossant J, Tam PPL), pp. 421-498. San Diego: Academic Press.
14. Depew MJ, Simpson CA (2006) 21st century neontology and the comparative development of the vertebrate skull. Dev Dyn 235, 1256-1291.
15. Escorihuela R, Fernandez-Teruel A, Vallina I, et al. (1995) A behavioral assessment of Ts65Dn mice: A putative Down syndrome model. Neurosci Lett 199, 143-146.
16. Fink G, Madaus W, Walker G (1975) A quantitative study of the face in Down syndrome. Am J Orthod 67, 540-553.
17. Fischer-Brandies H (1988) Cephalometric comparison between children with and without Down syndrome. Eur J Orthod 10, 255-263.
18. Francis-West PH, Robson L, Evans DJR (2003) Craniofacial Development: the Tissue and Molecular Interactions That Control Development of the Head, Berlin: Springer.
19. Frostad W, Cleall J, Melosky L (1971) Craniofacial complex in the Trisomy 21 syndrome (Down syndrome). Arch Oral Biol 16, 707-722.
20. Hall BK, Miyake T (2000) All for one and one for all: Condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays 22, 138-147.
21. Hall B (2003a) Unlocking the black box between genotype and phenotype: cell condensations as morphogenetic (modular) units. Biol Philosophy 18, 219-247.
22. Hall BK (2003b) The emergence of form: The shape of things to come. Dev Dyn 228, 292-298.
23. Hallgrímsson B, Willmore K, Hall BK (2002) Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs. Yearb Phys Anthropol 45, 131-158.
24. Hallgrímsson B, Willmore K, Dorval C, Cooper DM (2004) Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 302, 207-225.
25. Holtzman DM, Santucci D, Kilbridge J, et al. (1996) Developmental abnormalities and age-related neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 13333-13338.
26. Hyde LA, Crnic LS, Pollock A, Bickford PC (2001) Motor learning in Ts65Dn mice, a model for Down syndrome. Dev Psychobiol 38, 33-45.
27. Kisling E (1966) Cranial Morphology in Down Syndrome: A Comparative Roentgencephalometric Study in Adult Males. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
28. Klaauw CVD (1945) Cerebral skull and facial skull. Arch Neerl Zool 7, 16-37.
29. Klaauw C (1948-52) Size and position of the functional components of the skull. Arch Neerl Zool 7, 16-37.
30. Lauridsen H, Hansen BF, Reintoft I, Keeling JW, Skovgaard LT, Kjaer I (2005) Short hard palate in prenatal trisomy 21. Orthod Craniofac Res 8, 91-95.
31. Lele S, Richtsmeier JT (1995) Euclidean distance matrix analysis: confidence intervals for form and growth differences. Am J Phys Anthropol 98, 73-86.
32. Lele S, Richtsmeier J (2001) An Invariant Approach to the Statistical Analysis of Shapes. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
33. Mao JJ, Wang X, Mooney MP, Kopher RA, Nudera JA (2003) Strain induced osteogenesis of the craniofacial suture upon controlled delivery of low-frequency cyclic forces. Front Biosci 8, a10-7.
34. Moore C, Lee J, Birren B, Stetten G, Baxter L, Reeves R (1999) Integration of cytogenetic with recombinational and physical maps of mouse chormosome 16. Genomics 59, 1-5.
35. Moss M (1971) Functional Cranial Analysis and the Functional Matrix. Patterns of Orofacial Growth and Development. Ann Arbor: American Speech and Hearing Association Reports.
36. Myrelid A, Gustafsson J, Ollars B, Anneren G (2002) Growth charts for Down syndrome from birth to 18 years of age. Arch Dis Child 87, 97-103.
37. O'Riordan M, Walker G (1978) Dimensional and proportional characteristics of the face in Down syndrome. J Dentistry Handicapped 4, 6-9.
38. Ogle RC, Tholpady SS, McGlynn KA, Ogle RA (2004) Regulation of cranial suture morphogenesis. Cells Tissues Organs 176, 54-66.
39. Olson L, Richtsmeier JT, Leszl J, Reeves R (2004a) A chromosome 21 critical region does not cause specific Down syndrome phenotypes. Science 306, 687-690.
40. Olson LE, Roper RJ, Baxter LL, Carlson EJ, Epstein CJ, Reeves RH (2004b) Down syndrome mouse models Ts65Dn, Ts1Cje, and Ms1Cje/Ts65Dn exhibit variable severity of cerebellar phenotypes. Dev Dyn 230, 581-589.
41. Opperman LA (2000) Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn 219, 472-485.
42. Opperman LA, Rawlins JT (2005) The extracellular matrix environment in suture morphogenesis and growth. Cells Tissues Organs 181, 127-135.
43. Opperman LA, Fernandez CR, So S, Rawlins JT (2006) Erk1/2 signaling is required for Tgf-beta2-induced suture closure. Dev Dyn 235, 1292-1299.
44. Potier MC, Rivals I, Mercier G, et al. (2006) Transcriptional disruptions in Down syndrome: A case study in the Ts1Cje mouse cerebellum during post-natal development. J Neurochem 97 (Suppl. 1), 104-109.
45. Pryor H, Thelander H (1967) Growth deviations in handicapped children. Clin Pediatrics 6, 501-512.
46. Rarick G, Wainer H, Thissen D, Seefeldt V (1975) A double logistic comparison of growth patterns of normal children and children with Down syndrome. Ann Human Biol 2, 339-346.
47. Reeves R, Irving N, Moran T, et al. (1995) A mouse model for Down syndrome exhibits learning and behavior deficits. Nat Genet 11, 177-184.
48. Reeves R, Rue E, Yu J, Kao F-T (1998) Stch maps to mouse Chromosome 16 extending the conserved synteny with human Chromosome 21. Genomics 49, 156-157.
49. Reeves RH, Baxter LL, Richtsmeier JT (2001) Too much of a good thing: mechanisms of gene action in Down syndrome. Trends Genet 17, 83-88.
50. Richtsmeier JT, Lele S (1993) A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: Models and theoretical considerations. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 68, 381-411.
51. Richtsmeier JT, Paik CH, Elfert PC, Cole TM, 3rd, Dahlman HR (1995) Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 32, 217-227.
52. Richtsmeier JT, Baxter LL, Reeves RH (2000) Parallels of craniofacial maldevelopment in Down syndrome and Ts65Dn mice. Dev Dyn 217, 137-145.
53. Roper RJ, Reeves RH (2006) Understanding the basis for Down syndrome phenotypes. PLoS Genet 2, e50.
54. Roper RJ, St John HK, Philip J, Lawler A, Reeves RH (2006) Perinatal loss of Ts65Dn Down syndrome mice. Genetics 172, 437-443.
55. Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J, Newman SA (2003) Mechanisms of pattern formation in development and evolution. Development 130, 2027-2037.
56. Skrinjaric T, Glavina D, Jukic J (2004) Palatal and dental arch morphology in Down syndrome. Coll Antropol 28, 841-847.
57. Valeri CJ, Cole TM, 3rd Lele S, Richtsmeier JT (1998) Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. Am J Phys Anthropol 107, 113-124.
58. Weiss K, Buchanan A (2004) Genetics and the Logic of Evolution. New York: John Wiley.
59. Weiss KM (2005) The phenogenetic logic of life. Nat Rev Genet 6, 36-45.
60. Wilkins A (2002) The Evolution of Developmental Pathways. Sunderland, MA: Sinaer Associates.
61. Yu JC, Lucas JH, Fryberg K, Borke JL (2001) Extrinsic tension results in FGF-2 release, membrane permeability change, and intracellular Ca++ increase in immature cranial sutures. J Craniofac Surg 12, 391-398.