Self reported risk behaviour among injecting drug users: Self versus assisted questionnaire completion

AIDS Care - Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 441-447

  White, B ^a   Day, C ^a   Maher, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAMORPHINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF REPORT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SYRINGE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; CONDOMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; NEEDLE SHARING; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK-TAKING; SAFE SEX; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS; UNSAFE SEX;

EID: 34147110392     PISSN: 09540121     EISSN: 13600451     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09540120701192837     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aquilino, W.S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210-240.
2. Aquilino, W.S., & Losciuto, L.A. (1990). Effects of interview mode on self-reported drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362-395.
3. Des Jarlais, D., Paone, D., Milliken, J., Turner, C.F., Miller, H., Gribble, J., et al. (1999). Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomised trial. Lancet, 353, 1657-1661.
4. Hewett, P.C., Mensch, B.S., & Erulkar, A.S. (2004). Consistency in the reporting of sexual behaviour by adolescent girls in Kenya: A comparison of interviewing methods. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 80, S43-S48.
5. Hewitt, M. (2002). Attitudes towards interview mode and comparability of reporting sexual behavior by personal interview and audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Analysis of the 1995 national survey of family growth. Sociological Methods and Research, 31, 3-26.
6. Johnson, B.T., & Richter, L. (2004). Research note: What if we're wrong? Some possible implications of systematic distortions in adolescents' self-reports of sensitive behaviors. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 951-970.
7. Kaye, S., & Darke, S. (2000). A comparison of the harms associated with the injection of heroin and amphetamines. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 58, 189-195.
8. Macalino, G.E., Celentano, D.D., Latkin, C., Strathdee, S.A., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14, 367-378.
9. MacDonald, M., Wodak, A., Dolan, K., Van Beek, I., Cunningham, P.H., & Kaldor, J. (2000). Hepatitis C virus antibody prevalence among injecting drug users at selected needle and syringe programs in Australia, 1995-1997. Medical Journal of Australia, 172, 57-61.
10. MacDonald, M., Wodak, A.D., Ali, R., Crofts, N., Cunningham, P.H., Dolan, K.A., et al. (1997). HIV prevalence and risk behaviour in needle exchange attenders: A national study. Medical Journal of Australia, 166, 237-240.
11. Metzger, D.S., Koblin, B., Turner, C., Navaline, H., Valenti, F., Holte, S., et al. (2000). Randomised controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 99-106.
12. Newman, J.C., Des Jarlais, D.C., Turner, C.F., Gribble, J., Cooley, P., & Paone, D. (2002). The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 294-297.
13. Perlis, T.E., Des Jarlais, D., Friedman, S.R., Arasteh, K., & Turner, C.F. (2004). Audio-computerised self-interviewing verus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction, 99, 885-896.
14. Potdar, R., & Koenig, M.A. (2005). Does audio-CASI improve reports of risky behavior? Evidence from a randomized field trial among young urban men in india. Studies in Family Planning, 36, 107-116.
15. Riley, E.D., Chaisson, R.E., Robnett, T.J., Vertefeuille, J., Strathdee, S.A., & Vlahov, D. (2001). Use of audio computer-assisted self-interviews to assess tuberculosis related risk behaviors. American Journal of Respiratory Care, 164, 82-85.
16. Thein, H., Denoe, M., Van Beek, I., Dore, G., & MacDonald, M. (2003). Injecting behaviour of injecting drug users at needle and syringe programmes and pharmacies in Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 14, 452-430.
17. Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T.W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275-304.
18. Turner, C.F., Ku, L., Rogers, S.M., Lindberg, L.D., Pleck, J.H., & Sonenstein, F.L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.
19. Van de Wijgert, J., Padian, N., Shiboski, S., & Turner, C. (2000). Is audio computer-assisted self-interviewing a feasible method of surveying in Zimbabwe? International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 885-890.
20. Williams, M.L., Freeman, R.C., Bowen, A.M., Zhao, Z., Elwood, W.N., Gordon, C., et al. (2000). A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 199-213.
21. Zanis, D., McLellan, A., & Randall, M. (1994). Can you trust patient self-reports of drug use during treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 35, 127-132.