|
|
Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 116-120
|
|
Literature review: should nursing take aromatherapy more seriously?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
AROMATHERAPY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HOLISTIC NURSING;
HUMAN;
INFECTION CONTROL;
INJURY;
METHODOLOGY;
NAUSEA;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
NURSING;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;
PENICILLIN RESISTANCE;
PILOT STUDY;
RESTLESSNESS;
REVIEW;
STANDARD;
STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;
STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UNITED STATES;
AROMATHERAPY;
CLINICAL TRIALS;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HOLISTIC NURSING;
HUMANS;
INFECTION CONTROL;
METHICILLIN RESISTANCE;
NAUSEA;
NURSE'S ROLE;
NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH;
PILOT PROJECTS;
PSYCHOMOTOR AGITATION;
STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS;
STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;
TERMINAL CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED STATES;
WOUNDS AND INJURIES;
|
|
EID: 34147106380
PISSN: 09660461
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2007.16.2.22772 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (29)
|
|
References (22)
|
