The time course of stimulus expectation in a saccadic decision task

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 2722-2730

  Oswal, A ^a   Ogden, Miriam ^a   Carpenter, R H S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGING; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; CUES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; KINETICS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SACCADES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34147100545     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01238.2006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover, 1965.
2. Adams MWJ, Wood D, Carpenter RHS. Expectation acuity: the spatial specificity of the effect of prior probability on saccadic latency. J Physiol 527: 140-141, 2000.
3. Anderson AJ, Carpenter RHS. Changes in expectation consequent on experience, modelled by a simple, forgetful neural circuit. J Vision 6: 822-835, 2006.
4. Basso MA, Wurtz RH. Modulation of neural activity by target uncertainty. Nature 389: 66-69, 1997.
5. Baumeister A, Joubert C. Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency. Q J Exp Physiol 82: 393-395, 1969.
6. Bayes T. Essay toward solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 53: 370-418, 1763.
7. Bertelson P. Central intermittency twenty years later. Q J Exp Psychol 18: 153-163, 1966.
8. Bevan W, Hardesty DL, Avant LL. Response latency with constant and variable interval schedules. Percept Mot Skills 20: 969-972, 1965.
9. Buckholtz E, Ruggins O. The relationship between estimates of foreperiod duration and simple reaction time. J Mot Behav 10: 211-221, 1978.
10. Carpenter RHS. Oculomotor procrastination. In: Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception, edited by Fisher DF, Monty RA, Senders JW. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981, p. 237-246.
11. Carpenter RHS. SPIC: a PC-based system for rapid measurement of saccadic responses. J Physiol 480: 4P, 1994.
12. Carpenter RHS. A neural mechanism that randomises behaviour. J Conscious Stud 6: 13-22, 1999.
13. Carpenter RHS, Williams MLL. Neural computation of log likelihood in the control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377: 59-62, 1995.
14. Elthorn A, Lawrence C. Central inhibition: some refractory observations. Q J Exp Physiol 11: 211-220, 1955.
15. Gallistel CR, Gibbon G. Time, rate and conditioning. Psychol Rev 107: 289-344, 2000.
16. Gibbon J, Malapani C, Dale CL, Gallistel C. Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7: 170-184, 1997.
17. Hermelin B. Effects of variation in the warning signal on reaction times of severe subnormals. Q J Exp Physiol 16: 241-249, 1964.
18. Janssen P, Shadlen MN. A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nat Neurosci 8: 234-241, 2005.
19. Karlin L. Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration. J Exp Psychol 58: 185-191, 1959.
20. Karlin L. Development of readiness to respond to short foreperiods. J Exp Psychol 72: 505-509, 1966.
21. Kolmogorov A. Confidence limits for an unknown distribution function. Ann Math Stat 23: 525-540, 1941.
22. Leon MI, Shadlen MN. Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron 38: 317-327, 2003.
23. Luce RD. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. London: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.
24. Näätänen R. The diminishing time-uncertainty with the lapse of time after the warning signal in reaction-time experiments with varying fore-periods. Acta Psychol 34: 399-419, 1970.
25. Näätänen R. Non-aging fore-period and simple reaction time. Acta Psychol 35: 316-327, 1971.
26. Nickerson RS, Burnham SW. Response times with nonaging foreperiods. J Exp Psychol 79: 452-457, 1969.
27. Niemi P, Näätänen R. Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychol Bull 59: 133-162, 1981.
28. Ober JK, Przedpelska-Ober E, Gryncewicz W, Dylak J, Carpenter RHS, Ober JJ. Hand-held system for ambulatory measurement of saccadic durations of neurological patients. In: Modelling and Measurement in Medicine, edited by Gajda J. Warsaw: Komitet Biocybernityki i Inzyneierii Biomedycznej PAN, 2003, p. 187-198.
29. Platt ML, Glimcher PW. Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 400: 233-238, 1999.
30. Polzella DJ, Ramsey EG, Bower SM. The effects of brief variable foreperiods on simple reaction time. Bull Psychon Soc 27: 467-469, 1989.
31. Reddi B, Carpenter RHS. The influence of urgency on decision time. Nat Neurosci 3: 827-831, 2000.
32. Reddi BAJ, Asrress KN, Carpenter RHS. Accuracy, information and response time in a saccadic decision task. J Neurophysiol 90: 3538-3546, 2003.
33. Requin J, Granjon M, Durup H, Reynard G. Effects of a timing signal on simple reaction time with a rectangular distribution of foreperiods. Q J Exp Physiol 25: 344-313, 1973.
34. Schall JD. On building a bridge between brain and behavior. Annu Rev Psychol 55: 02.01- 02.28, 2003.
35. Sinha N, Brown JTG, Carpenter RHS. Task switching as a two-stage decision process. J Neurophysiol 95: 3146-3153, 2006.
36. Thomas EA. Reaction-time studies: the anticipation and interaction of responses. Br J Math Stat Psychol 20: 1-29, 1967.
37. Woodrow H. The measurement of attention. Psychol Monogr 17: 1914.
38. Woodrow H. The reproduction of temporal intervals. J Exp Psychol 13: 473-499, 1930.