Patients derogate physicians who use a computer-assisted diagnostic aid

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 189-202

  Arkes, Hal R ^a   Shaffer, Victoria A ^b   Medow, Mitchell A ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Decision support techniques; Diagnosis computer assisted; Patient satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ANKLE FRACTURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; STUDENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANKLE INJURIES; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; OHIO; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 34147096826     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X06297391     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications: clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2001 ; 64: 15 - 37.
2. Balas EA Information systems can prevent errors and improve quality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 ; 8: 398 - 9.
3. Sim I., Gorman P., Greenes RA, et al. Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 ; 8: 527 - 34.
4. Pozen MW, D'Agostino RB, Mitchell JB, et al. The usefulness of a predictive instrument to reduce inappropriate admissions to the coronary care unit. Ann Intern Med. 1980 ; 92: 238 - 42.
5. Dawes RM, Faust D., Meehl PE Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989 ; 243: 1668 - 74.
6. Corey GA, Merenstein JH Applying the acute ischemic heart disease predictive instrument. J Fam Pract. 1987 ; 25: 127 - 33.
7. de Dombal FT, Dallos V., McAdam Waf. Can computer aided teaching packages improve clinical care in patients with acute abdominal pain? BMJ. 1991 ; 310: 1495 - 7.
8. Ridderikhoff J., van Herk E. A diagnostic support system in general practice: is it feasible? Int J Med Inform. 1997 ; 45: 133 - 43.
9. Friedman DP, Elstein AS, Wolf FM Enhancement of clinicians' diagnostic reasoning by computer-based consultation: a multisite study of 2 systems. JAMA. 1999 ; 282: 1851 - 5.
10. Getty DJ, Pickett RM, D'Orsi CJ, Swets JA Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. Invest Radiol. 1988 ; 23: 240 - 52.
11. Chase CR, Vacek PM, Shinozaki T., Giard AM, Ashikaga T. Medical information management: improving the transfer of research results to presurgical evaluation. Med Care. 1983 ; 21: 410 - 24.
12. Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K., Carey M. Does this patient have strep throat? JAMA. 2000 ; 284: 2912 - 8.
13. Centor RM, Witherspoon JM, Dalton HP, Brody CE, Link K. The diagnosis of strep throat in adults in the emergency room. Med Decis Making. 1981 ; 1: 239 - 46.
14. Walsh BT, Bookheim WW, Johnson RC, Tompkins RK Recognition of Streptococcal pharyngitis in adults. Arch Intern Med. 1975 ; 135: 1493 - 7.
15. Stiell I. Ottawa ankle rules. Can Fam Physician. 1996 ; 42: 478 - 80.
16. Hunt DL, Haynes B., Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA. 1998 ; 280: 1339 - 46.
17. Kassirer JP A report card on computer-assisted diagnosis- the grade C. New Engl J Med. 1994 ; 330: 1824 - 5.
18. Rocha BHSC, Christenson JC, Evans RS, Gardner RM. Clinicians' response to computerized detection of infections. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 ; 8: 117 - 25.
19. Overhage JM, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients. Arch Intern Med. 1996 ; 156: 1551 - 6.
20. Keefe B., Subramanian U., Tierney WM, et al. Provider response to computer-based care suggestions for chronic heart failure. Med Care. 2005 ; 43: 461 - 5.
21. Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A., et al. Awareness and use of the Ottawa Ankle and Knee Rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice? Ann Emerg Med. 2001 ; 37: 259 - 66.
22. Hilton NZ, Simmons JL The influence of actuarial risk assessment in clinical judgments and tribunal decisions about mentally disordered offenders in maximum security. Law Hum Beh. 2001 ; 25: 393 - 408.
23. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999 ; 282: 1458 - 65.
24. Meehl PE Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. J Pers Assess. 1986 ; 50: 370 - 5.
25. Cruikshank PJ Patient ratings of doctors using computers. Soc Sci Med. 1985 ; 21: 615 - 22.
26. Garrison GM, Bernard ME 21st century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med. 2002 ; 34: 362 - 8.
27. Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room? J Fam Pract. 1995 ; 41: 242 - 4.
28. Lipkus IM, Samsa G., Rimer BK General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001 ; 21: 37 - 44.
29. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S., Black WC, Welch GH The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997 ; 127: 966 - 71.
30. Ayanian JZ, Berwick DM Do physicians have a bias toward action? A classic study revisited. Med Decis Making. 1991 ; 11: 154 - 8. 31. Bakwin H. Pseudodoxia pediatrica. New Engl J Med. 1945 ; 232: 691 - 7.
31. Pezzo MV, Pezzo SP Physician evaluation after medical errors: does having a computer decision aid help or hurt in hindsight? Med Decis Making. 2006 ; 26: 48 - 56.
32. Kelley HH The process of causal attribution. Am Psychol. 1973 ; 28: 107 - 28.
33. Thorndike EL A constant error on psychological rating. J Appl Psychol. 1920 ; 4: 25 - 9.
34. Kaplan B. Culture counts: how institutional values affect computer use. MD Comput. 2000 ; 17: 23 - 6.
35. Arkes HR, Dawes RM, Christensen C. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1986 ; 37: 93 - 110.
36. Whitecotton SM The effects of experience and confidence on decision aid reliance: a causal model. Behav Res Account. 1996 ; 8: 194 - 216.
37. Latham GP, Whyte G. The futility of utility analysis. Pers Psychol. 1994 ; 47: 31 - 46.
38. Whyte G., Latham GP The futility of utility analysis revisited: when even an expert fails. Pers Psychol. 1997 ; 50: 601 - 10.
39. Dawes RM The robust beauty of improper linear models. Am Psychol. 1979 ; 34: 571 - 82.
40. Meehl PE Causes and effects of my disturbing little book. J Pers Assess. 1986 ; 50: 370 - 5.
41. Yates JF, Veinott ES, Patalano AL Hard decisions, bad decisions: on decision quality and decision aiding. In: Schneider SL, Shanteau J, eds. Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research. New York: Cambridge University Press ; 2003. p 13 - 63.
42. Hammond KR Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice. New York: Oxford University Press ; 1996.
43. Hogarth RM Educating Intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press ; 2001.
44. Arkes HR Impediments to accurate clinical judgment and possible ways to minimize their impact. J Consult Clin Psych. 1981 ; 49: 323 - 30.
45. Arkes HR, Rothbart M. Memory organization, retrieval and contingency judgments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1985 ; 49: 598 - 606.
46. Kahneman D., Tversky A. On the psychology of prediction. Psychol Rev. 1973 ; 80: 237 - 51.