Celiac artery compression syndrome: Successful utilization of robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach

Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 93-96

  Jaik, Nikhil P ^a   Stawicki, S Peter ^b   Weger, Natalie S ^a   Lukaszczyk, John J ^a  

^a St Luke's Hospital   (United States)

^b Stawicki Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

Celiac axis compresion syndrome; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic assisted

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PAIN; ADULT; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT DYSKINESIA; CASE REPORT; CELIAC ARTERY STENOSIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL FEATURE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; CELIAC ARTERY; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS; SYNDROME;

EID: 34047265477     PISSN: 18418724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Harjola PT. A rare obstruction of the celiac artery: Report of a case. Ann Chir Ginecol Fenniae 1982;52:574.
2. Reilly LM, Ammar AD, Stoney RJ, et al. Late results following operative repair for celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg 1985;2:79-91.
3. Cina CS, Safar H. Successful treatment of recurrent celiac axis compression syndrome. A case report. Panminerva Med 2002;44:69-72.
4. Carbonell AM, Kercher KW, Heniford BT, et al. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic management of median arcuate ligament syndrome. Surg Endosc 2005;19:729.
5. Williams S, Gillespie P, Little JM. Celiac axis compression syndrome: Factors predicting a favorable outcome. Surgery 1985;98:879-887.
6. Roayaie S, Jossart G, Gitlitz D, et al. Laparoscopic release of celiac artery compression syndrome facilitated by laparoscopic ultrasound scanning to confirm restoration of flow. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:814-817.
7. Sleisenger MH. The celiac artery syndrome - Again? Ann Intern Med 1977;86:355.
8. Watson WC, Sadikali F. Celiac axis compression: Experience with 20 patients and a critical appraisal of the syndrome. An Intern Med 1977;86:278.
9. Horton KM, Talamini MA, Fishman EK. Median arcuate ligament syndrome: Evaluation with CT angiography. Radiographics 2005;25:1177-1182.
10. Dordoni L, Tshomba Y, Giacomelli M, et al. Celiac artery compression syndrome: successful laparoscopic treatment-a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2002;36:317-321.
11. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1389-402.
12. Smith JA Jr, Herrell SD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages? J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8170-8175.
13. Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, et al. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant esophageal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:1202-1206.
14. El Nakadi I, Melot C, Closset J, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication: clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 2006;30:1050-1054.
15. Gettman MT, Blute ML. Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: technique, outcomes, and cost. Curr Urol Rep 2006;7:193-199.
16. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg 2006;243:486-491.
17. Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X. Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2006; 24:171-179.
18. Alehan D, Dogan OF. Pediatric surgical image. A rare case: celiac artery compression syndrome in an asymptomatic child. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:645-647.
19. Allen RC, Martin GH, Rees CR, et al. Mesenteric angioplasty in the treatment of chronic intestinal ischemia. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:415-421.
20. Spies JB, Bakal CW, Burke DR, et al. Standards of practice committee, Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology: Guidelines for percutaneous angioplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1990;1:1-15.